What is a normal Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR) measurement?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 27, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Normal Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR) Measurement

An IMR value less than 25 units is considered normal, with values of 25 units or greater indicating microvascular dysfunction. 1

Diagnostic Threshold

  • IMR <25 units = Normal microcirculatory function 1, 2
  • IMR ≥25 units = Abnormal, indicating structural microvascular disease 1, 2, 3

The 2019 ESC Guidelines for Chronic Coronary Syndromes explicitly state that IMR ≥25 units is the threshold for diagnosing microvascular dysfunction and guiding treatment decisions. 1

Measurement Technique

IMR is calculated during maximal hyperemia (induced by intravenous adenosine) using the formula: IMR = Pd × Tmn, where:

  • Pd = distal coronary pressure measured by pressure wire 1
  • Tmn = mean transit time of a 3 mL bolus of room temperature saline measured by thermodilution 1

Clinical Context and Nuances

IMR is independent of hemodynamic variations because it is measured during hyperemia, making it more reproducible than coronary flow reserve (CFR). 1 This is a critical advantage over CFR, which varies with blood pressure, heart rate, and other hemodynamic factors.

Alternative Cut-off Values in Research

While the guideline-endorsed threshold is 25 units, some research studies have used slightly different cut-offs:

  • One study in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy used IMR ≤22.0 as normal 4
  • An angiography-derived IMR study found 25.1 as the optimal cut-off for predicting adverse outcomes 5

However, for clinical practice, use IMR <25 units as the normal threshold as recommended by the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. 1, 2

Comparison with Coronary Flow Reserve

Unlike CFR (which has a normal value ≥2.0-2.5), IMR specifically measures structural microvascular resistance rather than functional reserve capacity. 1, 2 A patient can have:

  • Normal IMR (<25) but abnormal CFR (<2.0): suggests functional microvascular dysfunction or diffuse epicardial disease 1
  • Abnormal IMR (≥25) with abnormal CFR (<2.0): indicates structural microvascular disease 1

Clinical Application

When IMR ≥25 units is documented with abnormal CFR <2.0 and negative acetylcholine provocation testing, initiate treatment with beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, statins, and lifestyle modifications. 1 This represents guideline-directed therapy for structural microvascular disease.

Target IMR reduction to <25 units as an objective treatment endpoint when optimizing medical therapy for microvascular dysfunction. 3

Important Caveats

  • IMR requires a pressure-temperature sensor guidewire and hyperemic agents, which limits routine use 6, 7
  • IMR is measured in specific coronary territories, so values may differ between vessels in the same patient 7
  • Angiography-derived IMR (wire-free methods) show 83% accuracy compared to invasive IMR, with a similar threshold of approximately 25 units 5, 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Testing for Microvascular Dysfunction

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Management of Structural Coronary Microvascular Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Index of microcirculatory resistance in the assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology, 2022

Research

Angiography-derived versus invasively-determined index of microcirculatory resistance in the assessment of coronary microcirculation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.