Is spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) part of standard state newborn screening panels?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 27, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Spinal Muscular Atrophy Newborn Screening Status

Yes, spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is now part of standard state newborn screening panels in the United States, having been added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel in July 2018. As of June 2021,34 states had fully implemented SMA screening, with at least 8 additional states pursuing implementation 1. By February 2024, all 50 U.S. states have achieved full implementation 2.

Historical Context and Rationale for Addition

  • SMA was added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel by the HHS Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (ACHDNC) in July 2018, primarily based on the availability and efficacy of newly approved disease-modifying therapies 3, 4.

  • The original 2006 ACMG uniform screening panel identified 29 core conditions for mandatory screening, but SMA was not included at that time 5.

  • The approval of nusinersen by the FDA in December 2016 fundamentally changed the treatment landscape, making early identification through newborn screening clinically actionable and beneficial for patient outcomes 4.

Current Implementation and Screening Methodology

  • State programs utilize real-time quantitative PCR assays on dried blood spots to detect deletions of exon 7 in the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene 3, 6.

  • The CDC developed a locked nucleic acid probe-based real-time PCR assay to achieve the necessary specificity for detecting SMN1 exon 7 deletions 2.

  • The CDC has established comprehensive laboratory support infrastructure, including quality assurance materials, proficiency testing programs supporting 115 newborn screening laboratories worldwide, and external quality control material programs 2.

Clinical Outcomes from Early Implementation

New York State Experience (2018-2021)

  • Nearly 650,000 infants were screened in the first 3 years, with 34 screening positive 3.

  • 94% of identified infants received treatment, with the overwhelming majority (94%; 30/32) receiving gene replacement therapy 3.

  • Most infants were treated before 6 weeks of age (median = 34.5 days of life; range 11-180 days) 3.

  • All infants with 3 copies of SMN2 remained clinically asymptomatic post-treatment, while those with 2 copies showed more variable outcomes 3.

California Experience (2020-2021)

  • 628,791 newborns were tested in the first 18 months, with 34 screening positive 6.

  • Infants were referred, diagnosed, and treated at a median of 8,12, and 33 days of life, respectively 6.

  • 62% received treatment while still asymptomatic, demonstrating the screening program's effectiveness in enabling early intervention 6.

Common Barriers to Timely Treatment

Medical Delays

  • Presence of AAV9 antibodies (relevant for gene replacement therapy) 3.

  • Elevated troponin I levels requiring medical clearance 3.

Non-Medical Barriers

  • Delays in obtaining insurance authorization 3.

  • Insurance policies restricting coverage for specific treatment modalities 3.

Important Caveats

  • The variability in age at symptom onset means some asymptomatic patients identified through screening may not require therapy for years or decades, raising ethical considerations about early identification 4.

  • A long-term follow-up registry is ethically essential to ensure benefits outweigh harms for all screened infants, including those with milder and/or later-onset forms of SMA 4.

  • The incidence observed in screened populations remains lower than previously predicted, affecting resource allocation and counseling approaches 3.

Related Questions

What's the next step when parents of a child with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) refuse intubation due to a previous child's fatal outcome from the same illness?
What is the prognosis and treatment for a newborn with poor feeding, tongue fasciculations, and decreased deep tendon reflexes, potentially indicating a severe neuromuscular disorder such as spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)?
What is Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)?
Are motor neuron disease (MND), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), poliomyelitis, and Kennedy's disease (spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy) correct causes of anterior horn cell disorders?
What is the general diagnostic approach to spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)?
What is the best course of action for a patient with nephrotic syndrome and an expanded vein, who is showing improved renal function on terlipressin (vasopressin analogue) 2mg every 6 hours?
What is the best course of treatment for a female patient with a history of kidney stones, presenting with severe low back and side pain, fever, tachycardia, and urinalysis results indicating a urinary tract infection, including leukocytes, nitrites, and bacteria, after initial discharge with a diagnosis of muscle strain?
What are the expected autopsy findings in a patient with a history of small bowel obstruction who suffered a massive aspiration of particulate and feculent bowel contents?
What medication can be used to prevent withdrawal symptoms in a patient tapering off MS Contin (morphine sulfate)?
How can you differentiate between scaphocephaly and normal elongation of the head in infants and young children?
Can a repeat X-ray (x-radiation) be done within 1 month in an adult patient with no underlying medical conditions, such as pregnancy or history of radiation therapy, with minimal immediate risk?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.