Management of Suspected Acute Appendicitis with Alvarado Score 5-10
For patients with Alvarado scores of 5-6 (intermediate risk), obtain CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast immediately, as these patients have only 30-36% probability of appendicitis and lack diagnostic certainty; for scores 7-10 (high risk), proceed directly to surgical consultation as these patients have 78-98% probability of appendicitis, with CT reserved to assess for perforation or complications. 1, 2, 3
Risk Stratification by Score Range
Intermediate Risk (Alvarado Score 5-6)
CT imaging is strongly recommended for all patients in this range:
- These patients have only 30-36% probability of actually having appendicitis, making clinical diagnosis unreliable 1, 4
- CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast provides 90.4% sensitivity and 95% specificity in this equivocal group 1, 4
- The Alvarado score lacks sufficient specificity to confirm appendicitis and should never be used alone for surgical decision-making 5, 2
Special considerations for elderly patients (≥60 years):
- CT scan is strongly recommended for all elderly patients with scores ≥5 due to higher perforation risk and atypical presentations 5, 1
- The Alvarado score is unreliable at extremes of age and cannot differentiate complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis in elderly patients 5
- If IV contrast is contraindicated, use MRI if available, or non-contrast CT as alternative 1
If immediate CT unavailable:
- Admit for clinical observation with serial abdominal examinations 1
- Obtain CT if symptoms persist or worsen during observation 1
- Do not discharge patients with intermediate scores without adequate monitoring, especially elderly patients 1
High Risk (Alvarado Score 7-10)
Surgical consultation should be obtained before imaging:
- These patients have 77-98% probability of appendicitis 1, 3, 4
- The specificity at this threshold is 100% for appendicitis 4
- CT may still be considered to assess for perforation or complications before surgery, particularly in elderly patients where complicated appendicitis is more common 1, 3
Critical Limitations to Recognize
The Alvarado score has important performance gaps:
- It is sufficiently sensitive to exclude appendicitis (99% sensitivity at cutoff <5) but not sufficiently specific to confirm it 5, 2
- The score performs poorly in elderly patients, HIV-positive patients, and pregnant women 5, 2
- It cannot differentiate complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis 5
Alternative scoring systems outperform Alvarado:
- The AIR (Appendicitis Inflammatory Response) score and Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS) have better discriminating power and are recommended as first-line clinical predictors in adults 5, 2
- These scores include CRP values and allow for severity grading, reducing negative appendectomy rates 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never use the Alvarado score alone to confirm appendicitis or make surgical decisions 5, 2
- Do not discharge patients with scores 5-6 without imaging or adequate observation 1
- Do not rely on the score in elderly patients without confirmatory imaging, as they have higher perforation rates and atypical presentations 5, 1
- Remember that pregnant women may have falsely elevated scores due to higher WBC and frequent nausea/vomiting, especially in first trimester 5