Calcium Hypochlorite Ingestion: Diagnosis and Management
Diagnosis
This patient has acute corrosive gastritis from calcium hypochlorite ingestion, manifesting as chemical injury to the gastrointestinal mucosa. 1
The diagnosis is established by:
- History of ingesting 5-10 mL of calcium hypochlorite solution (approximately 2% concentration based on 5 grams in 250 mL water) 1
- Clinical presentation of abdominal pain and multiple episodes of vomiting (>5 episodes), which are hallmark features of corrosive gastrointestinal injury 1
- Stable vital signs currently, though this does NOT exclude significant mucosal injury or evolving complications 2, 3
Key Diagnostic Considerations
The concentration ingested (approximately 2%) places this in the moderate-to-high concentration range where corrosive injury is likely, though household bleach typically contains 3-6% sodium hypochlorite. 1 Calcium hypochlorite behaves similarly to sodium hypochlorite, causing toxicity through oxidizing capacity and alkaline pH-related corrosive activity upon contact with mucous membranes. 1
Critical caveat: Stable vital signs do NOT exclude severe corrosive injury—patients can have extensive mucosal damage without immediate hemodynamic compromise. 3, 1
Immediate Management Algorithm
Step 1: Initial Stabilization and Assessment (First 30 Minutes)
- Establish large-bore IV access immediately and begin isotonic crystalloid resuscitation at 1000-2000 mL bolus, then maintain at 125-250 mL/hour 2
- Check vital signs every 5-10 minutes initially, monitoring specifically for tachycardia, fever, hypotension, and tachypnea as these predict serious complications 2, 3
- Make patient NPO (nothing by mouth) immediately—no oral intake, no activated charcoal, no attempts at dilution or neutralization 4, 1
- Do NOT induce vomiting or perform gastric lavage, as this increases risk of re-exposure and aspiration 1
Step 2: Laboratory Evaluation (Within First Hour)
Draw blood immediately for:
- Complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel (including calcium, sodium, chloride), and arterial or venous blood gas with lactate 2, 3, 1
- Elevated lactate >2 mmol/L would indicate tissue injury and potential ischemia 5
- Monitor for metabolic acidosis, hypernatremia, and hyperchloremia, which can occur with large ingestions 1
- Hypercalcemia may develop from calcium hypochlorite specifically (unlike sodium hypochlorite), requiring monitoring 6
Step 3: Endoscopic Evaluation (Within 12-24 Hours)
Fiberoptic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) should be performed within 12-24 hours to assess severity of corrosive injury, as this determines prognosis and guides further management. 4, 1
- EGD is indicated because the patient has significant symptoms (multiple episodes of vomiting, abdominal pain) after ingesting a moderate concentration solution 1
- Endoscopy assesses risk of mortality, risk of stricture formation, and extent of mucosal injury 4, 1
- Perform EGD before 24 hours but after initial stabilization—avoid the 5-15 day window when perforation risk is highest due to tissue necrosis 4
Step 4: Imaging Evaluation
Obtain CT chest/abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast if any of the following develop: 4, 1
- Development of peritoneal signs (rebound tenderness, guarding, rigidity) 3
- Hematemesis or signs of gastrointestinal bleeding 1
- Fever, tachycardia, or hemodynamic instability 2, 3
- Severe retrosternal or epigastric pain suggesting transmural injury 1
CT is complementary to endoscopy for assessing transmural injury, perforation, and mediastinal involvement. 4, 1
Step 5: Supportive Care
- Administer IV proton pump inhibitor (e.g., pantoprazole 40 mg IV twice daily) to reduce acid-related secondary injury 1
- Provide antiemetic therapy with ondansetron 4-8 mg IV every 8 hours for persistent vomiting 3
- Maintain adequate hydration with isotonic crystalloids, as vomiting causes significant fluid losses 3
- Monitor urine output targeting >0.5 mL/kg/hour 2
Step 6: Serial Clinical Monitoring
Perform serial abdominal examinations every 4-6 hours to detect development of peritonitis, which would indicate perforation requiring emergency surgery. 2, 3
Monitor continuously for:
- Development of peritoneal signs (rebound, guarding, rigidity) 3
- Worsening abdominal pain or new-onset severe pain 3
- Hemodynamic deterioration (tachycardia, hypotension) 2, 3
- Fever or signs of sepsis 2
Management Based on Endoscopic Findings
Grade 0-I Injury (No injury or superficial mucosal injury)
- Continue NPO for 24-48 hours, then advance diet as tolerated 1
- Discharge with PPI therapy and close outpatient follow-up 1
Grade II Injury (Deep mucosal/submucosal injury without perforation)
- Maintain NPO status for 48-72 hours minimum 1
- Continue IV PPI therapy 1
- Consider total parenteral nutrition if prolonged NPO anticipated 4
- Monitor for stricture development over subsequent weeks to months 1
Grade III Injury (Transmural injury, necrosis, or perforation)
- Immediate surgical consultation for potential emergency laparotomy 4
- Broad-spectrum antibiotics (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375 g IV every 6 hours) 4
- Aggressive fluid resuscitation with norepinephrine 0.05-3.3 mcg/kg/min if septic shock develops 2
- Surgical options include primary repair with drainage, esophageal/gastric resection, or damage control surgery depending on extent of injury 4
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do NOT give activated charcoal—hypochlorite is not bound by charcoal, and administration risks aspiration and worsens injury 4, 1
- Do NOT attempt neutralization with acids or dilution with water/milk—this generates heat and worsens injury 1
- Do NOT delay endoscopy beyond 24 hours in symptomatic patients—early assessment is crucial for prognosis 4, 1
- Do NOT assume stable vital signs mean absence of serious injury—corrosive damage can be extensive despite initial stability 3, 1
- Do NOT place nasogastric tube blindly—this risks perforation if severe esophageal injury present; only place under endoscopic guidance if needed 4
Prognosis
Most patients with small-to-moderate household bleach ingestions recover without long-term sequelae, but this patient's significant symptom burden (>5 episodes vomiting, abdominal pain) warrants aggressive evaluation and monitoring. 1 The concentration ingested (approximately 2%) and volume (5-10 mL) place this patient at moderate risk for significant corrosive injury requiring endoscopic assessment. 1
Long-term complications include esophageal or gastric stricture formation, which may require endoscopic dilation or surgical intervention in severe cases. 1, 6