2D Border Definition for Rectal Cancer Radiotherapy
For rectal cancer radiotherapy using 2D planning with anatomic (bony) landmarks, the radiation field should include the tumor with a 2-5 cm safety margin, with the lower border positioned at least 3-5 cm distal to the tumor or at the inferior border of the obturator foramen (IBOF), whichever is more inferior. 1, 2
Superior Border
- The upper border should extend to the S1-2 level to encompass presacral nodes along the superior rectal vessels 1
- If presacral nodes are radiologically involved, the upper border should be positioned even higher than S1-2 1
- For high rectal tumors (above peritoneal reflection), it is sufficient to include 4-5 cm distal to the tumor, allowing the lower border to be 5-6 cm distal to the tumor 1
Inferior Border
- The lower border must be at least 3-5 cm distal to the gross tumor 1, 2, 3
- Alternatively, position the inferior border at the IBOF, whichever is more inferior 3
- This approach is critical because in 82.8% of cases, the external anal sphincter lies completely inferior to the IBOF, and meticulous planning avoids unnecessary sphincter irradiation 3
Lateral Borders
For Tumors Below Peritoneal Reflection (≤9-12 cm from anal verge):
- Include lateral nodes along the inferior rectal and obturator arteries 1
- Include internal iliac nodes up to the bifurcation from the common iliac arteries 1
For High Rectal Tumors (>9-12 cm from anal verge):
- Lateral pelvic nodes are seldom involved in high tumors regardless of T-stage, so routine inclusion is not necessary 1
Special Circumstances Requiring Field Expansion
External Iliac Nodes:
- Only include if anterior organs (bladder, prostate, female sexual organs) are involved to the extent that these nodal stations are at risk 1
Ischiorectal Fossae:
- Only include when levator muscles and internal/external sphincters are involved 1
Inguinal Nodes:
- Only include prophylactically when tumor grows at or below the dentate line 1
Aberrant Nodal Spread:
- When lymph nodes show metastatic disease on imaging, there is risk of aberrant spread, and the clinical target volume can be enlarged to include additional nodal stations 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Avoid using classic bony landmarks alone without considering tumor location, as this may result in geographic miss or excessive normal tissue irradiation 3, 4
- The external anal sphincter position varies significantly relative to bony landmarks, with only 82.8% completely inferior to the IBOF 3
- In 2D planning based on anatomic landmarks, treatment volumes are typically smaller than modern 3D-based consensus volumes, potentially leading to marginal misses 4
- Modern guidelines strongly favor 3D-CRT, VMAT, or IMRT over 2D techniques to improve target coverage and reduce toxicity 1, 2
Transition to Modern Techniques
While 2D planning using bony landmarks was used in early randomized trials, current standards recommend three-dimensional precision radiotherapy (3D-CRT/VMAT or IMRT) to improve accuracy and reduce dose to organs at risk 1, 2. The 2D approach described above should only be used when modern planning is unavailable, as it carries higher risk of geographic miss and increased toxicity 1, 4.