Management of Failed Ulnar Nerve Release
After an unsuccessful ulnar nerve release, the patient requires revision surgery with comprehensive exploration and decompression of all potential compression sites, ideally via submuscular transposition, combined with multimodal pain management and realistic counseling about outcomes.
Initial Assessment and Diagnostic Workup
Clinical Evaluation
- Identify all potential compression sites through systematic examination, as failed decompressions typically involve multiple unaddressed compression levels (average 2.2 sites) 1
- Perform electrodiagnostic studies (EMG/nerve conduction) to assess severity of denervation and localize persistent compression sites 2, 3
- Obtain MRI with T2-weighted neurography as the reference standard, which shows high signal intensity and nerve enlargement at compression sites 2
- Consider ultrasound as an effective alternative with high accuracy (sensitivity 77-79%, specificity 94-98%) for assessing nerve cross-sectional area and thickness 2
Prognostic Factors
Critical warning: Age >50 years, electromyographic evidence of denervation, and previous submuscular transposition are associated with poor outcomes in revision surgery 1
Revision Surgical Strategy
Operative Approach
- Perform submuscular transposition as the preferred revision technique for most failed decompressions, as this provides a healthy vascular bed and soft tissue protection 1, 4
- Systematically explore and release ALL potential compression sites including:
- Retrocondylar groove
- Cubital tunnel retinaculum (Osborne ligament)
- Humeroulnar arcade
- Deep flexor/pronator aponeurosis
- Extend decompression at least 5-6 cm distal to the medial epicondyle 4
Technical Considerations
- Ensure adequate proximal and distal mobilization to prevent nerve kinking 4
- Preserve blood flow to the nerve during transposition 4
- In cases of severe scarring, submuscular transposition is preferred over subcutaneous approaches 4
Alternative Techniques for Specific Scenarios
- For proximal ulnar nerve injuries with poor prognosis: Consider distal median-to-ulnar nerve transfer, which reduces denervation time and directs motor fibers into critical distributions 5
- This includes anterior interosseous nerve to deep motor branch transfer and sensory transfers for comprehensive restoration 5
Multimodal Pain Management
Pharmacological Approach
- Initiate paracetamol (up to 4g/day) as first-line oral analgesic 2
- Apply topical NSAIDs for localized pain with fewer systemic side effects 2
- Consider peri-ulnar nerve methylprednisolone and lidocaine injections for persistent symptoms, as local steroid injections may facilitate nerve recovery by reducing secondary inflammatory injury 6
Non-Pharmacological Measures
- Implement range of motion and strengthening exercises to maintain function 2
- Apply specific padding (foam or gel pads) at the elbow to prevent further compression, ensuring padding is not too tight to avoid tourniquet effect 2
- Maintain neutral forearm position when arm is at side, use supinated or neutral position when abducted 2
- Limit arm abduction to 90° and avoid prolonged pressure on the postcondylar groove 2
Monitoring and Follow-up
- Schedule regular follow-up to monitor for progression or improvement of symptoms 2
- Perform periodic assessment of upper extremity position and function 2
- Avoid excessive elbow flexion beyond 90° as this increases risk of recurrent neuropathy 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Incomplete exploration: Failing to identify and release all compression sites is the primary cause of revision failure 1
- Inadequate mobilization: Insufficient proximal or distal nerve mobilization leads to kinking and compromised blood flow 4
- Inappropriate patient selection: Patients with advanced denervation, age >50, or previous submuscular transposition have significantly worse outcomes and require counseling about realistic expectations 1
- Delayed intervention: Conservative management after failed surgery is rarely successful when motor weakness, muscle atrophy, or fixed sensory changes are present 3, 4
Expected Outcomes
- Satisfactory results can be achieved in approximately 73% of revision cases (22 of 30 patients in the highest quality study) 1
- Most patients report symptomatic relief following appropriate revision surgery 3
- Recovery is significantly better when all compression sites are addressed during a single revision procedure 1