Differentiating and Managing Sinus Bradycardia vs Mobitz Type 1
The key distinction is that sinus bradycardia shows a sinus rate <50 bpm with every P wave conducting to the ventricles (1:1 conduction), while Mobitz Type 1 shows progressive PR interval prolongation before a single nonconducted P wave with inconstant PR intervals. 1
ECG Differentiation Algorithm
Sinus Bradycardia Characteristics
- Sinus rate <50 bpm with normal P-wave axis and PR interval 1
- 1:1 atrioventricular conduction - every P wave conducts to the ventricles 1
- Constant PR intervals throughout the rhythm strip 1
- QRS complexes follow each P wave predictably 1
Mobitz Type 1 (Wenckebach) Characteristics
- P waves with constant rate (<100 bpm) where AV conduction is present but not 1:1 1
- Progressive PR interval prolongation before the blocked beat - this is the hallmark finding 1
- Periodic single nonconducted P wave with inconstant PR intervals before and after 1
- "Group beating" pattern on ECG due to the cyclical nature of conduction 1
- Block typically occurs at the AV node level (not infranodal) 1, 2
Clinical Context Assessment
Determine Symptom Attribution
Symptomatic bradycardia requires documented bradyarrhythmia directly responsible for syncope, presyncope, dizziness, lightheadedness, heart failure symptoms, or confusional states from cerebral hypoperfusion 1
Critical Timing Considerations
- Vagally mediated AV block can occur during sleep when parasympathetic tone increases, often asymptomatic 1
- Look for concomitant sinus node slowing (P-P prolongation) during episodes of vagal AV block 1
- Vasovagal syncope can cause bradycardia through sudden parasympathetic surge 1
Management Algorithm
For Sinus Bradycardia
Asymptomatic patients:
- No treatment required if physiologic (athletes, sleep) 3, 4
- Monitor for symptoms and reversible causes 4, 5
Symptomatic patients:
- Atropine 0.5 mg IV bolus every 3-5 minutes up to maximum 3 mg total dose for acute management 6, 3
- Caution: Doses <0.5 mg may paradoxically slow heart rate due to parasympathomimetic effects 2
- Identify and treat reversible causes (medications, electrolytes, hypothyroidism) 4, 5
- Permanent pacemaker indicated only if symptomatic sinus node dysfunction persists after reversible causes excluded 1, 3
For Mobitz Type 1
Asymptomatic patients with typical (AV nodal) Mobitz Type 1:
- Generally benign and does not require pacemaker 2
- Avoid AV nodal blocking agents (beta-blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, digoxin, adenosine) as they worsen AV nodal conduction 2
- Continuous cardiac monitoring if hospitalized 2
Symptomatic patients:
- Atropine 0.5 mg IV bolus may be therapeutic for AV nodal-level Mobitz Type 1 2, 6
- Assess hemodynamic status before any IV bolus administration 2
- Consider temporary pacing if atropine ineffective and symptoms persist 3, 5
Critical Pitfall: Infranodal Mobitz Type 1
Do not assume all Mobitz Type 1 is benign - rare infranodal cases exist with worse prognosis similar to Mobitz Type 2 2, 7
Red flags suggesting infranodal disease:
- Wide QRS complex (≥120 ms) suggests His-Purkinje disease 2
- Higher risk of progression to complete heart block 2, 7
- May require permanent pacemaker like Mobitz Type 2 7
Medication Safety Considerations
Contraindicated in Both Conditions
- Beta-blockers (esmolol, metoprolol, propranolol) contraindicated in AV block >first degree or SA node dysfunction unless pacemaker present 2
- Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (diltiazem, verapamil) carry same contraindication 2
- Digoxin slows AV nodal conduction and should be avoided 2
- Adenosine contraindicated in AV block >first degree without pacemaker 2
Safe Medications
Most IV medications without AV nodal blocking properties can be administered safely to Mobitz Type 1 patients 2
When to Escalate Care
Immediate Cardiology/EP Referral Needed
- Any symptomatic bradycardia unresponsive to atropine 3, 5
- Mobitz Type 1 with wide QRS (concern for infranodal disease) 2
- Progression to higher-grade AV block on monitoring 2, 5
- Hemodynamic instability requiring transcutaneous pacing 3, 5
Monitoring Requirements
Continuous cardiac monitoring essential when administering any IV bolus to patients with Mobitz Type 1 to detect progression to higher-grade block and assess hemodynamic compromise 2