What makes a coronary artery a suitable target for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 29, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

What Makes a Coronary Artery a Suitable Target for CABG

A coronary artery is suitable for CABG when it has ≥70% diameter stenosis (or ≥50% for left main disease), supplies viable myocardium, and is technically amenable to grafting with adequate vessel size and distal runoff. 1

Anatomic Criteria for Target Vessel Suitability

Stenosis Severity Requirements

  • The target vessel must have ≥70% diameter stenosis in non-left main coronary arteries to justify revascularization. 1
  • Left main coronary artery disease requires only ≥50% diameter stenosis to be considered significant. 1
  • Stenoses <70% diameter (non-left main) should not be bypassed unless fractional flow reserve is ≤0.80 or there is demonstrable ischemia on noninvasive testing. 1
  • Borderline stenoses (50-60% diameter) without demonstrable ischemia are not suitable targets. 1

Vessel Characteristics That Favor CABG Suitability

  • Larger reference vessel diameter increases suitability, as this predicts better graft patency and clinical importance. 2
  • More proximal vessel location enhances suitability for bypass grafting. 2
  • The amount of myocardium supplied (jeopardized myocardium) is a critical determinant—vessels supplying larger territories of viable myocardium are more suitable targets. 1, 2

Technical Considerations

  • Total occlusions (99-100% stenosis) are suitable for CABG when there is viable myocardium in the subtended zone and shorter duration of occlusion. 2, 3
  • Unlike PCI, CABG suitability is less affected by lesion morphology such as length, calcification, or tortuosity—making CABG favorable for complex lesions. 2
  • The vessel must be technically graftable with adequate distal vessel quality for anastomosis. 2

Functional and Physiological Criteria

Viability Assessment

  • The target vessel must supply viable myocardium in the region of intended revascularization, particularly in patients with reduced ejection fraction (35-50%). 1, 4
  • In patients with severe LV dysfunction (EF <35%), CABG may be considered even without proven viability, though this is a weaker recommendation. 1, 4

Ischemia Documentation

  • Target vessels should supply territory with demonstrable ischemia, particularly when considering 2-vessel disease without proximal LAD involvement. 1
  • High-risk criteria on stress testing (>20% perfusion defect) or extensive ischemia strengthen the indication for bypass. 1
  • Vessels supplying only small areas of viable myocardium should not be bypassed. 1

Clinical Context That Defines Suitable Targets

Multivessel Disease Patterns

  • Three-vessel disease with ≥70% stenosis makes all three major vessels suitable targets, with or without proximal LAD involvement. 1
  • Proximal LAD stenosis ≥70% plus one other major vessel with ≥70% stenosis defines suitable targets for survival benefit. 1
  • Two-vessel disease becomes suitable when there is severe/extensive ischemia or the vessels supply large areas of viable myocardium. 1

Special Populations

  • In diabetic patients with multivessel disease, vessels amenable to LIMA-to-LAD grafting are particularly suitable targets, as CABG provides superior survival compared to PCI. 1
  • Complex 3-vessel disease (SYNTAX score >22) makes vessels more suitable for CABG than PCI. 1

Vessels That Are NOT Suitable Targets

Critical Exclusions

  • Vessels with <70% stenosis (or <50% for left main) without abnormal FFR (>0.80) or demonstrable ischemia should not be bypassed. 1
  • Isolated left circumflex or right coronary artery stenosis subtending only small areas of viable myocardium is not a suitable target. 1
  • Vessels in patients with insignificant stenosis (<50% diameter) are never suitable targets. 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not bypass vessels based solely on angiographic appearance without considering functional significance—13.6% of lesions ≥50% are deemed clinically nonsignificant by experienced angiographers. 2

Avoid grafting vessels that supply non-viable myocardium in patients with prior infarction—viability assessment is essential, particularly when EF is 35-50%. 1, 4

Do not assume all vessels in multivessel disease require grafting—complete revascularization should target only vessels meeting anatomic and functional criteria. 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.