Hill Grading of the Gastroesophageal Valve in GERD Management
Hill grading of the gastroesophageal flap valve must be documented during every endoscopy performed for GERD evaluation, as it is a mandatory component of complete endoscopic assessment and provides critical information about anti-reflux barrier integrity that guides treatment decisions. 1, 2
What Hill Grading Assesses
Hill grading evaluates the integrity of the gastroesophageal flap valve at the diaphragmatic hiatus during endoscopy, measuring the competence of the anti-reflux barrier mechanism. 2 This assessment helps predict disease severity and treatment response, with abnormal flap valve (Hill grades III/IV) strongly associated with both symptomatic GERD and erosive esophagitis. 3
The grading system classifies the valve from Grade I (normal, tight approximation) to Grade IV (completely incompetent), with Grades I-II considered normal and Grades III-IV abnormal. 2, 3
When to Perform Hill Grading
Hill grading should be performed in the following clinical scenarios:
PPI non-responders: Patients with heartburn, regurgitation, or non-cardiac chest pain failing 4-8 weeks of PPI therapy require endoscopy with Hill grading assessment. 1, 2
Alarm symptoms: Patients presenting with dysphagia, odynophagia, weight loss, or gastrointestinal bleeding need immediate endoscopy with Hill grading. 2
Chronic PPI users with unproven GERD: Patients on long-term PPI therapy without objective GERD diagnosis should undergo endoscopy within 12 months of PPI initiation to establish appropriateness of continued therapy. 1, 2
Surgical candidates: All patients being evaluated for anti-reflux procedures (laparoscopic fundoplication, magnetic sphincter augmentation, transoral incisionless fundoplication) require Hill grading as part of comprehensive preoperative assessment. 2, 4
Complete Endoscopic Evaluation Requirements
Every GERD endoscopy report must document four mandatory components: 1, 2, 4
- Erosive esophagitis severity using Los Angeles classification (Grade A through D when present)
- Hill grade of the gastroesophageal flap valve (Grades I through IV)
- Axial hiatus hernia length measured in centimeters
- Barrett's esophagus graded by Prague classification with biopsies when present
Treatment Algorithm Based on Hill Grading and Endoscopic Findings
Patients with Conclusive GERD Evidence (No Further pH Monitoring Needed)
If Los Angeles Grade B or higher esophagitis is found, this constitutes definitive GERD evidence. 2 These patients require:
- Long-term PPI therapy at the lowest effective dose 1
- Cannot wean off PPIs due to confirmed erosive disease 1
- Consider surgical intervention if severe erosive esophagitis (Los Angeles C or D) with medically refractory symptoms 2, 4
If long-segment Barrett's esophagus (≥3 cm) is found, this also constitutes conclusive GERD evidence. 1, 2 These patients require:
Patients Requiring Further Evaluation
If no erosive disease is found or only Los Angeles Grade A esophagitis (which can occur in healthy volunteers), perform prolonged wireless pH monitoring off PPI. 1, 2 The protocol is:
- Stop PPI for 2-4 weeks before testing 1
- Perform 96-hour wireless pH monitoring (preferred over 24-hour catheter-based) 1, 2
- If normal acid exposure (<4.0%) on all 4 days, consider PPI withdrawal and alternative diagnoses 1
- If abnormal acid exposure on ≥2 days, continue long-term PPI therapy 1
Impact of Hill Grading on Treatment Response
Abnormal gastroesophageal flap valve (Hill grades III/IV) predicts poor response to PPI therapy. 5 Specifically:
- Patients with abnormal GEFV have 83% lower odds of responding to 4-week PPI treatment (OR 0.17) 5
- Abnormal GEFV also predicts 83% lower odds of responding to 8-week PPI treatment (OR 0.17) 5
- Abnormal GEFV increases risk of symptomatic GERD by 88% (RR 1.88) compared to normal GEFV 3
- In symptomatic GERD patients, abnormal GEFV increases risk of erosive esophagitis by 117% (RR 2.17) 3
Clinical Implications for PPI Management
For patients with normal GEFV (Hill grades I-II):
- Start with single-dose PPI (omeprazole 20 mg or equivalent) taken 30-60 minutes before a meal for 4-8 weeks 1, 6
- If inadequate response, escalate to twice-daily dosing or switch to more potent PPI 1, 6
- After adequate response, taper to lowest effective dose 1
- Consider PPI withdrawal if no erosive disease or Barrett's esophagus 1
For patients with abnormal GEFV (Hill grades III-IV):
- Anticipate need for higher PPI doses and longer treatment duration 5
- More likely to require long-term maintenance therapy 1
- Consider earlier referral for surgical evaluation if symptoms persist despite optimized medical therapy 2, 4
- Adjunctive therapies may be needed: alginate antacids for breakthrough symptoms, H2 receptor antagonists for nocturnal symptoms, baclofen for regurgitation-predominant symptoms 1
Surgical Planning Considerations
Hill grading is critical when evaluating candidacy for anti-reflux surgery. 2, 4 All surgical candidates require:
- Confirmatory evidence of pathologic GERD (erosive esophagitis ≥LA Grade B, long-segment Barrett's, or abnormal pH monitoring) 2, 4
- High-resolution manometry to assess esophageal peristaltic function and exclude achalasia 2, 4
- Complete endoscopic evaluation including Hill grading and hiatus hernia measurement 2, 4
- Barium esophagram to assess hernia size, esophageal length, and differentiate sliding from paraesophageal hernias 4
Patients with abnormal GEFV and large hiatus hernias are more likely to benefit from surgical intervention, particularly if they have severe erosive esophagitis or PPI-refractory symptoms. 2, 4
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not assume Los Angeles Grade A esophagitis confirms GERD—this finding occurs in healthy volunteers and requires pH monitoring for confirmation. 1, 2
Do not perform pH monitoring while patient is on PPI for initial GERD diagnosis—this must be done off medication after 2-4 week washout. 1, 2
Do not continue long-term PPI without objective GERD evidence—endoscopy with Hill grading should be performed within 12 months of PPI initiation for unproven GERD. 1, 2
Do not refer for surgery without complete preoperative evaluation—this must include Hill grading, manometry, pH monitoring, and often barium studies. 2, 4
Do not overlook the specificity of abnormal GEFV—it has 73.3% specificity for symptomatic GERD and 75.7% specificity for erosive esophagitis, making it a reliable marker. 3