What is the best salvage therapy for a 45-year-old patient with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) who had a partial response to R-CHP (Rituximab (rituximab)-Cyclophosphamide (cyclophosphamide)-Doxorubicin (doxorubicin)-Prednisone (prednisone)) chemotherapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 29, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Best Salvage Therapy for Relapsed DLBCL After R-CHP

For this 45-year-old patient with partial response to R-CHP, the best salvage therapy is a rituximab-based platinum regimen (either R-DHAP or R-ICE) followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) if chemosensitive response is achieved. 1

Critical Initial Assessment

Before initiating salvage therapy, this patient requires:

  • Histological confirmation is mandatory since the initial response was only partial (not complete remission), to verify CD20 positivity and confirm DLBCL histology rather than transformation 1
  • Complete restaging identical to initial diagnosis: CT chest/abdomen, bone marrow biopsy, CBC, LDH, cardiac function assessment 1
  • International Prognostic Index (IPI) recalculation 1
  • Geriatric assessment is not needed at age 45, but performance status and organ function must be adequate (no major organ dysfunction) 2

Recommended Salvage Regimen

Either R-DHAP or R-ICE should be selected, as they demonstrate equivalent efficacy with no survival difference between the two regimens 2, 1, 3:

  • R-DHAP: Rituximab + dexamethasone + high-dose cytarabine + cisplatin
  • R-ICE: Rituximab + ifosfamide + carboplatin + etoposide

The CORAL study definitively established equivalence between these regimens, showing similar response rates (R-ICE 63.5% vs R-DHAP 62.8%) and identical 3-year event-free survival 3. Choose R-DHAP if concerned about neurotoxicity from ifosfamide, or R-ICE if renal function is compromised (cisplatin in R-DHAP is nephrotoxic) 2.

Treatment Algorithm

Step 1: Administer 3 cycles of chosen salvage regimen

  • Rituximab is included despite prior R-CHP exposure 2
  • Response assessment after 2-3 cycles 2

Step 2: Proceed to ASCT if chemosensitive

  • Only patients achieving complete or partial response to salvage therapy should proceed to high-dose therapy with ASCT 2, 1
  • BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) is the most commonly used conditioning regimen 2
  • Consider involved-field radiotherapy for limited-stage disease, though this lacks controlled trial evidence 2, 1

Step 3: If no response to salvage therapy

  • Consider allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with refractory disease to salvage therapy 2, 1
  • Clinical trial enrollment is strongly recommended 2

Critical Prognostic Factors

This patient's outcome depends heavily on three factors 3:

  1. Time to relapse/progression: Partial response (not CR) to first-line therapy predicts poor outcome—only 45% achieve long-term remission with salvage therapy 4
  2. Prior rituximab exposure: Reduces 3-year event-free survival from 47% (rituximab-naive) to 21% (prior rituximab) 3
  3. IPI score at relapse: IPI 2-3 yields 18% 3-year EFS vs 40% for IPI 0-1 3

The combination of partial response to R-CHP and prior rituximab exposure places this patient in a high-risk category, with expected 3-year event-free survival of approximately 20-30% even with optimal salvage therapy and ASCT 3, 4.

Essential Supportive Measures

  • Administer prednisone 100 mg orally for several days as "prephase" treatment if high tumor burden exists, to prevent tumor lysis syndrome 1
  • Ensure adequate hydration and consider allopurinol prophylaxis 1
  • Prophylactic G-CSF is indicated to maintain dose intensity 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not delay histological confirmation—transformation or alternative diagnoses occur in late relapses 1
  • Do not proceed to ASCT without documented chemosensitive response to salvage therapy—outcomes are dismal without response 4
  • Do not use non-platinum salvage regimens (R-GEMOX, bendamustine) in transplant-eligible patients, as these are reserved for transplant-ineligible patients 2, 1
  • Do not omit rituximab from salvage therapy despite prior exposure—phase II data suggest benefit even after rituximab-containing first-line therapy 2

Alternative if Transplant-Ineligible

If this patient develops contraindications to ASCT (organ dysfunction, poor performance status), alternative salvage regimens include R-GEMOX (rituximab, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin) combined with involved-field radiotherapy 2, 1.

References

Guideline

Treatment of Recurrent Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Salvage regimens with autologous transplantation for relapsed large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.