Early Intervention for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Yes, both ESDM (Early Start Denver Model) and EIBI (Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention) are strongly recommended evidence-based interventions for young children with autism spectrum disorder, and treatment should begin immediately upon suspicion or diagnosis of ASD with 20-30 hours per week of intensive intervention. 1
Core Recommendation: Start Immediately with High Intensity
Begin intensive intervention as soon as ASD is suspected or diagnosed—do not wait for formal diagnostic completion. 1 The American Academy of Pediatrics emphasizes that interventions initiated before age 3 years have significantly greater impact than those begun after age 5. 1
Treatment Intensity Requirements
- Deliver 20-30 hours per week of child-directed intervention for comprehensive programs like ESDM or EIBI. 1, 2
- Include 5 hours per week of parent education and training as an essential component, enabling parents to function as co-therapists and promote skill generalization across home and community settings. 1, 3
- Treatment intensity significantly contributes to changes across all outcome measures—higher intensity correlates with better outcomes. 2
Evidence Supporting Both ESDM and EIBI
ESDM (Early Start Denver Model)
- ESDM is a comprehensive naturalistic developmental behavioral intervention that integrates Applied Behavior Analysis with developmental science, considered best practice for young autistic children. 1, 4
- ESDM demonstrated significantly improved outcomes in randomized controlled trials, with large effect sizes after 6-8 weeks for joint attention skills and moderate effect sizes after 12 months for expressive language growth. 1
- Recent 2023 research shows ESDM significantly outperformed discrete trial teaching in enhancing gross motor, personal-social skills, and language abilities in toddlers and preschoolers. 5
- ESDM dramatically reduced severity of autistic symptoms in toddlers with severe ASD. 5
EIBI (Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention)
- EIBI (including the UCLA/Lovaas model) showed significantly improved outcomes in randomized controlled trials with therapeutic durations of 2-3 years. 1
- A 2026 meta-analysis of 341 children receiving EIBI demonstrated effect sizes of 0.66 for adaptive behavior, 0.87 for intellectual functioning, and 1.36 for reductions in ASD severity. 2
- Number Needed to Treat ranges from 4.1 to 6.9, meaning for every 4-7 children treated with EIBI, one additional child achieves clinically significant improvement compared to comparison groups. 2
- EIBI should currently be considered the preferred treatment for children with ASD based on broad, substantial effects. 2
Choosing Between ESDM and EIBI: Predictors of Response
Children Who Respond Better to EIBI:
- Higher baseline IQ represents the strongest predictor of positive response to EIBI. 6
- EIBI is more structured and therapist-driven, utilizing discrete trial training approaches. 6
Children Who Respond Better to ESDM:
- Social cognitive skills including intention to communicate, receptive and expressive language, and attention to faces most consistently predict response to ESDM. 6
- ESDM is more naturalistic and child-driven, making it particularly appropriate for very young children. 6, 4
Implementation Framework
Delivery Format Options
- Home-based (parent-managed), center-based (clinic or school), or combination approaches are all acceptable depending on resources and child needs. 1
- Programs for children under 3 years are more likely to use developmental approaches, more intensively involve parents, and target social communication compared to preschool-aged programs. 1
Target Areas for Intervention
Focus on core ASD deficits: 1, 3
- Joint attention skills (large effect sizes achievable after 6-8 weeks) 1
- Social communication and emotional reciprocity 1
- Language skills (receptive and expressive) 1
- Imitation skills 1
Integration of Approaches
Combine developmental and behavioral strategies—the distinction between them is not very helpful as most effective programs blend features of both approaches. 1 Behavioral intervention curricula should be developmentally informed and based on developmental sequences, while developmental programs can use behavioral techniques to teach curriculum. 1
Monitoring and Adjustment
- Reassess within 4-8 weeks of initiating intervention to determine response and adjust intensity and focus based on which specific deficits show improvement. 3
- Individual responses vary—participants who demonstrate gains in some endpoints may continue to show impairment in others. 1
- Continue intensive intervention for at least 12 months, though optimal duration is typically 2-3 years. 1, 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not delay intervention waiting for formal diagnosis completion—begin as soon as ASD is seriously considered. 1
- Do not provide low-intensity intervention—evidence supports 20-30 hours per week, and treatment intensity significantly contributes to outcomes. 1, 2
- Do not exclude parent training—5 hours per week of parent education is essential for skill generalization. 1, 3
- Do not assume one intervention addresses all deficits—comprehensive programs must target multiple core ASD deficits simultaneously. 3
- Do not overlook that reported group differences may not reflect the range of individual responses—some children show gains in certain endpoints while continuing impairment in others. 1
Recent Evidence (2023-2026)
Both 2023 research demonstrating ESDM superiority over discrete trial teaching 5 and the 2026 meta-analysis showing EIBI's substantial effects 2 support that both models are highly effective when delivered with appropriate intensity (20-30 hours per week). The choice between them should be guided by child characteristics: higher baseline IQ favors EIBI, while stronger social cognitive skills favor ESDM. 6