Is there an increased risk of enamel decay in patients taking Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 30, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

No Increased Risk of Enamel Decay with GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

There is no evidence linking GLP-1 receptor agonist use to increased enamel decay. The available literature does not identify dental enamel deterioration as a recognized adverse effect of this medication class.

Established Gastrointestinal Effects Without Dental Implications

GLP-1 receptor agonists exert well-documented effects on the gastrointestinal system through delayed gastric emptying and reduced gastric acid secretion, but these mechanisms do not translate to enamel damage 1, 2. The medications work by:

  • Delaying gastric emptying through inhibition of gastric peristalsis and increased pyloric tone, mediated via vagal pathways 3
  • Reducing gastric acid secretion by approximately 20.7% compared to baseline 2
  • Increasing gastric pH through decreased acid production 2

Importantly, the reduction in gastric acidity would theoretically protect rather than harm dental enamel, as lower acid exposure in the oral cavity from reflux would decrease erosive potential 2.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Considerations

While shorter-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists (lixisenatide, exenatide with half-lives ≤1 day) are associated with increased erosive reflux disease compared to longer-acting agents, this does not establish a causal pathway to enamel decay 4. The study demonstrating this association showed:

  • Short-acting agents increased erosive reflux disease risk (HR 1.215,95% CI 1.111-1.328) 4
  • Long-acting agents (semaglutide, dulaglutide, liraglutide with half-lives ≥5 days) showed no increased reflux risk (HR 0.994,95% CI 0.924-1.069) 4

However, even with increased reflux episodes, direct measurement of esophageal acid exposure showed no significant difference in reflux frequency between lixisenatide and liraglutide users (33.7 vs. 40.1 episodes, P=0.17), and gastric acidity was actually reduced by 20.7% with GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy 2.

Common Gastrointestinal Adverse Effects

The documented adverse effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists are predominantly gastrointestinal but do not include dental complications 3, 5:

  • Nausea (17-44% of patients) 3
  • Abdominal pain (57.6% in real-world cohorts) 5
  • Diarrhea (12-32%) 3
  • Constipation (10-30.4%) 3, 5
  • Vomiting (6-25%) 3

None of these effects have established mechanisms for causing enamel erosion or decay 3, 5.

Clinical Implications

Patients on GLP-1 receptor agonists do not require additional dental monitoring beyond standard preventive care recommendations. The medication class does not appear on any list of drugs associated with xerostomia (dry mouth), enamel hypoplasia, or increased caries risk 1, 3.

If dental concerns arise in patients taking these medications, investigate standard risk factors for enamel decay including:

  • Dietary sugar intake and frequency
  • Oral hygiene practices
  • Salivary flow and composition
  • Concurrent medications that cause xerostomia (anticholinergics, antihistamines, antidepressants)
  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease from other causes

The anti-inflammatory properties of GLP-1 receptor agonists, including suppression of inflammatory cytokines and reduction of systemic inflammation, may theoretically provide modest periodontal benefits rather than harm 6.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.