What laboratory test should be ordered for a male patient with high-risk sexual behavior, including multiple male partners, and no symptoms of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 30, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

HSV-2 Serologic Screening for Asymptomatic MSM with High-Risk Sexual Behavior

For an asymptomatic male patient with multiple male partners and high-risk sexual behavior, order type-specific HSV-2 serology (glycoprotein G-based assay) as part of comprehensive STI screening, recognizing this represents a selective screening approach rather than universal screening. 1

Rationale for Selective HSV-2 Screening in This Population

The 2014 International Antiviral Society-USA guidelines explicitly recommend considering routine screening for HSV-2 infection in high-risk populations, including men who have sex with men (MSM) with multiple partners. 1 This recommendation acknowledges that:

  • Multiple sexual partners represent a well-established risk factor for HSV-2 acquisition, with seroepidemiologic studies consistently demonstrating higher HSV-2 prevalence among individuals with increased partner numbers. 2, 3

  • MSM attending STD clinics have substantially higher rates of HSV-2 infection compared to general populations, making targeted screening more cost-effective in this demographic. 2

  • Approximately 20% of HSV-2 seropositive persons remain asymptomatic, meaning they are unaware of their infection status and cannot take measures to prevent transmission. 1

Specific Test to Order

Order: Type-specific HSV-2 antibody test (glycoprotein G-based serology) 1, 4

The test must be:

  • Glycoprotein G-based (gG-2 specific), as conventional serologic techniques cannot discriminate between HSV-1 and HSV-2 antibodies. 2, 5
  • Type-specific for HSV-2, since HSV-1 antibodies are highly prevalent in the general population and do not indicate genital herpes risk. 4, 6

Important Caveats About HSV-2 Serologic Testing

Test Performance Limitations

Be aware that commercially available HSV-2 serologic assays have significant false-positive rates, particularly in low-prevalence populations. 1 The 2021 CDC guidelines note:

  • Index values ≥3.0 may be sufficient for diagnosis without confirmatory testing, though false positives have been documented even at index values >3.5. 1
  • Consider confirmatory testing with Biokit HSV-2 Rapid Test or Western blot if the initial result is positive with an index value <3.0, though access to these tests may be limited. 1

Contrast with USPSTF Recommendations

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends AGAINST screening for HSV-2 in asymptomatic adolescents and adults (Grade D recommendation). 1, 7 However, this recommendation applies to the general population with low pretest probability of infection. 1

The key distinction is that your patient has high pretest probability based on:

  • Multiple sexual partners 1
  • MSM status in the context of high-risk sexual behavior 1
  • Potential exposure to partners with unknown HSV-2 status 1

Clinical Management Based on Results

If HSV-2 Serology is Positive

Offer suppressive antiviral therapy (valacyclovir, acyclovir, or famciclovir) to:

  • Reduce asymptomatic viral shedding and transmission risk to partners 1
  • Prevent future symptomatic outbreaks 1

Counsel the patient that:

  • Suppressive therapy reduces but does not eliminate transmission risk 8
  • Condom use should be encouraged during all sexual exposures 7
  • Partners should be informed of HSV-2 status 8
  • Type-specific serologic testing of partners can determine their infection status 8

If HSV-2 Serology is Negative

Provide risk-reduction counseling including:

  • Condom use to reduce HSV-2 acquisition risk 1
  • Recognition of genital symptoms that warrant immediate evaluation 1
  • Consider repeat screening at 3-6 month intervals given ongoing high-risk behavior 1

Comprehensive STI Screening Panel for This Patient

Do not screen for HSV-2 in isolation. The 2014 IAS-USA guidelines recommend routine periodic screening for common STIs in MSM at 3-6 month intervals based on risk factors. 1 Your complete screening panel should include:

  • Syphilis: RPR or VDRL plus treponemal-specific test (EIA or CIA) 1
  • HIV: Fourth-generation antigen/antibody test 1
  • Gonorrhea and Chlamydia NAAT from:
    • Urine 1
    • Rectal swab (if receptive anal sex) 1
    • Pharyngeal swab (if receptive oral sex) 1
  • Hepatitis B and C screening (if not previously vaccinated/infected) 1
  • HSV-2 type-specific serology 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not order HSV-1 serology or non-type-specific HSV antibody tests, as these do not provide clinically useful information for genital herpes risk assessment. 4, 6

  • Do not use HSV PCR or viral culture in the absence of active lesions, as these tests require active mucocutaneous lesions for diagnosis. 9, 7

  • Do not order IgM antibody testing, as IgM responses occur in approximately one-third of recurrent HSV-2 cases and cannot distinguish acute from recurrent infection. 9

  • Do not assume a negative HSV-2 serology definitively excludes recent infection, as seroconversion typically takes 2-12 weeks after exposure. 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Recommendations for the selective use of herpes simplex virus type 2 serological tests.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2005

Research

Type-specific testing for herpes simplex virus.

Expert review of molecular diagnostics, 2004

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Genital Herpes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Herpes in Females

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.