Shockable Heart Rhythms
The shockable heart rhythms are ventricular fibrillation (VF) and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT). 1, 2
Definition and Classification
Shockable rhythms consist exclusively of ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia, which are the only cardiac arrest rhythms amenable to defibrillation therapy. 3, 2
These rhythms are distinguished from non-shockable rhythms, which include asystole and pulseless electrical activity (PEA), and require fundamentally different management approaches. 1, 2
Clinical Significance and Outcomes
Patients presenting with shockable rhythms have dramatically better survival outcomes, with 4-9 times higher survival rates compared to non-shockable rhythms. 1, 2
Cardiac arrest due to an initial rhythm of VF/pVT has better rates of survival to hospital discharge with favorable neurological function than arrests due to non-shockable rhythms. 3
In epidemiologic studies, survival statistics are consistently better when rhythms recorded by first responders are shockable (VF, pulseless VT) compared with pulseless electrical activity or asystole. 3
Over 80% of successful defibrillations occur within the first three shocks, with survival decreasing as the number of defibrillation attempts required increases. 2
Important Clinical Distinctions
Not all ventricular tachycardias are shockable—the critical distinction depends on whether the patient has a pulse. 2
Symptomatic VT with a palpable pulse is treated with synchronized cardioversion (not defibrillation), while pulseless VT is treated as VF with immediate unsynchronized defibrillation shocks. 4
The risk of VF/pVT steadily increases throughout childhood and adolescence but remains less frequent than in adults. 3
Automated Detection Considerations
AEDs demonstrate high specificity (99-100%) for correctly identifying non-shockable rhythms and excellent sensitivity for VF (94-96%). 2, 5
However, AEDs show lower sensitivity for rapid VT (60-71%), and some devices may not consistently advise shocks for monomorphic VT or Torsades de Pointes at certain rates. 2, 6
This variability in automated detection underscores the importance of manual rhythm interpretation by trained providers when possible. 6