You Need to Return to the GI Specialist and Undergo Colonoscopy
Given your history of Hodgkin's lymphoma with radiation therapy, family history of colon cancer, recurrent rectal bleeding, and current abdominal symptoms, you should immediately return to your GI specialist for colonoscopy—this is not optional.
Why Colonoscopy is Mandatory in Your Case
Multiple High-Risk Factors Converge
Your clinical picture contains several "red flags" that mandate endoscopic evaluation, not reassurance:
- Rectal bleeding is an alarm symptom that requires complete colonic evaluation regardless of hemorrhoid findings 1
- History of Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with chemotherapy and radiation places you at significantly increased risk for secondary gastrointestinal malignancies 1
- Family history of colon cancer in a first-degree relative further elevates your baseline risk 1
- Age 22 with recurrent bleeding episodes over 7 months represents persistent symptoms requiring investigation 1
The Hemorrhoid Explanation is Insufficient
A rectal examination finding of "irritated sphincter" and hemorrhoid cream prescription does not exclude serious pathology and should never prevent colonoscopy when bleeding persists. 1, 2 The British Society of Gastroenterology explicitly states that when positive fecal blood is found in a patient with hemorrhoids, complete colonic evaluation by colonoscopy is mandatory to rule out colorectal cancer 2. Your visible blood in the toilet bowl on multiple occasions over 7 months constitutes recurrent bleeding that demands full investigation 1.
Hodgkin's Lymphoma Survivors Have Elevated Colon Cancer Risk
Research demonstrates that patients with a history of Hodgkin's lymphoma have significantly elevated adenoma detection rates at younger ages than the general population:
- The adenoma detection rate (ADR) in Hodgkin's lymphoma patients aged 40-50 years is equivalent to non-cancer patients aged 50-70 years 3
- In one study, 5% of HL patients younger than 35 years had adenomas, 23% of those aged 35-40 had adenomas, and 39% of those aged 40-50 had adenomas 3
- Early screening colonoscopy significantly improved overall survival in lymphoma patients 4
- Patients are at risk for secondary malignancies throughout the GI tract after cancer treatment, not just at radiation sites 1
Radiation Therapy Creates Long-Term Cancer Risk
Your neck radiation at age 12 does not eliminate concern—cancer treatments have systemic effects and survivors require screening for second malignancies starting 5+ years after treatment: 1
- Guidelines specifically recommend endoscopic assessment for patients ≥5 years after radiotherapy for screening of second malignancy 1
- You are now 10 years post-treatment, placing you squarely in the high-risk surveillance window 1
- One-third of symptoms in cancer survivors are unrelated to the original cancer treatment, meaning new pathology must be excluded 1
Why Your Current Symptoms Demand Action
Recurrent Bleeding Pattern is Concerning
You've had three distinct bleeding episodes:
- Significant blood 7 months ago
- Lighter bleeding 4 months ago
- Lighter bleeding 2 months ago
- Now abdominal discomfort
This recurrent pattern over 7 months with new abdominal symptoms represents evolving pathology that requires investigation, not observation. 1 The American Gastroenterological Association guidelines state that blood in stools is an alarm sign requiring assessment to exclude structural disease 1.
The Giardia Finding Doesn't Explain Everything
While giardia was treated with metronidazole, this does not account for:
- The initial significant rectal bleeding (giardia typically causes diarrhea, not frank rectal bleeding) 1
- The recurrent bleeding episodes after giardia treatment 1
- Your current abdominal discomfort 1
What Investigations You Need Now
Colonoscopy is the Gold Standard
Complete colonoscopy with visualization of the entire colon and terminal ileum is required—not flexible sigmoidoscopy alone: 1
- Colonoscopy allows biopsy of lesions, treatment of adenomas, and identification of superficial pathology like angiodysplasia 1
- In patients with alarm symptoms (blood in stools), colonoscopy is recommended regardless of age 1
- The diagnostic yield is highest with full colonoscopy rather than limited sigmoidoscopy 1
Upper Endoscopy Should Also Be Considered
Given your history of cancer treatment and the systemic nature of chemotherapy effects, bidirectional endoscopy (both upper endoscopy and colonoscopy) may be warranted: 1
- Many cancer treatments have systemic effects throughout the GI tract, not limited by anatomical boundaries 1
- Upper GI endoscopy with duodenal biopsies can identify celiac disease, which has a ~5% prevalence in patients with unexplained GI symptoms 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Don't Be Falsely Reassured by Normal Blood Tests
Your normal blood tests do not exclude significant pathology:
- Normal hemoglobin does not rule out intermittent bleeding or early malignancy 1
- Liver enzyme normalization after stopping metronidazole is expected and unrelated to your bleeding 1
- Symptoms are unreliable at identifying underlying causes in cancer survivors 1
Don't Delay Because Symptoms Are Improving
The fact that your abdominal discomfort is "slowly going away" is irrelevant—you still need colonoscopy based on your recurrent bleeding and risk factors. 1 Many patients with significant pathology have waxing and waning symptoms 1.
Don't Accept "Watchful Waiting" from Your GI Specialist
Your GI specialist's initial assessment of being "mostly unconcerned" was made before knowing your complete clinical picture over time. The recurrent nature of your bleeding and your high-risk status mandate investigation, not observation 1.
Specific Action Plan
Contact your GI specialist immediately and report:
- Three episodes of rectal bleeding over 7 months
- New abdominal discomfort
- Your history of Hodgkin's lymphoma with chemotherapy and radiation
- Family history of colon cancer
- Request colonoscopy explicitly 1
If your GI specialist remains reluctant, seek a second opinion from another gastroenterologist who specializes in cancer survivors 1
Ensure the endoscopist is aware of your cancer history before the procedure, as this may affect biopsy decisions and surveillance intervals 1
Bottom Line
Your combination of Hodgkin's lymphoma history, family history of colon cancer, recurrent rectal bleeding, and current symptoms creates a clinical scenario where colonoscopy is mandatory, not optional. 1, 3 The hemorrhoid explanation is insufficient without excluding more serious pathology through complete colonic evaluation 1, 2. Research shows that lymphoma survivors have elevated colon cancer risk at younger ages and benefit from early screening 4, 3. Return to your GI specialist now and insist on colonoscopy—your life may depend on it.