What are the emerging treatments for patients with episodic or chronic migraine?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 31, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Emerging Treatments for Episodic and Chronic Migraine

CGRP-targeted therapies—including monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, eptinezumab) and oral gepants (atogepant, rimegepant)—represent the most significant emerging treatments for migraine prevention, with strong evidence supporting their use as second- or third-line options after traditional preventives fail. 1

CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs)

Strong Evidence for Prevention

  • Fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and erenumab receive "strong for" recommendations from both the American College of Physicians and VA/DoD for prevention of episodic or chronic migraine, demonstrating reductions in mean monthly migraine days by approximately 3.4-4.7 days compared to baseline. 1, 2, 3

  • Eptinezumab (intravenous) receives a "weak for" recommendation from VA/DoD for episodic or chronic migraine prevention, offering an alternative route of administration for patients who prefer quarterly infusions over self-injection. 1

  • These agents reduce migraine frequency by approximately 0.8-2.3 days per month compared to placebo, with favorable safety and tolerability profiles. 4, 5, 6

Mechanism Distinctions Matter

  • Fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab are humanized monoclonal antibodies that directly bind to the CGRP peptide itself, neutralizing free bioavailable CGRP. 4

  • Erenumab differs by binding to the CGRP receptor rather than the peptide, which may increase risk for development or worsening of hypertension—an important safety consideration when selecting among agents. 4

Clinical Trial Data

  • In episodic migraine trials, galcanezumab 120 mg monthly (with 240 mg loading dose) reduced migraine days by 4.3-4.7 days from a baseline of approximately 9 days per month, with 59-62% of patients achieving ≥50% reduction in migraine frequency. 2

  • Fremanezumab demonstrated similar efficacy with both monthly (225 mg) and quarterly (675 mg) dosing regimens, reducing migraine days by 3.4-3.7 days compared to 2.2 days with placebo. 3

Oral CGRP Receptor Antagonists (Gepants)

For Prevention

  • Atogepant receives a "weak for" recommendation from VA/DoD for episodic migraine prevention, with the 60 mg daily dose showing the greatest reduction in monthly migraine days (mean difference -1.48 days). 1, 4, 7

  • Rimegepant has "insufficient evidence" for prevention according to VA/DoD guidelines, though it is FDA-approved for this indication. 1

  • These oral agents competitively block the CGRP receptor without affecting CGRP peptide levels, offering daily oral dosing as an alternative to injectable therapies. 4, 6

For Acute Treatment

  • Rimegepant and ubrogepant receive "weak for" recommendations from VA/DoD for acute episodic migraine treatment, providing an alternative to triptans. 1, 4

  • These agents are particularly valuable for patients who cannot tolerate or have contraindications to triptans. 5

OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox)

  • OnabotulinumtoxinA receives a "weak for" recommendation specifically for chronic migraine prevention (≥15 headache days per month), but is recommended against for episodic migraine. 1, 8

  • FDA-approved for prophylaxis of headache in adults with chronic migraine, requiring specialist administration with specific injection protocols. 8

  • Patients should receive at least 2-3 treatment cycles before being classified as non-responders. 8

Treatment Algorithm for Emerging Therapies

First-Line Traditional Preventives Remain Standard

  • For episodic migraine: Consider beta-blockers (propranolol), antiseizure medications (topiramate, valproate), or ARBs (candesartan, telmisartan) as first-line options due to lower cost and established efficacy. 1

  • For chronic migraine: Topiramate is preferred first-line due to proven efficacy and lower cost ($100-300 annually vs. $7,071-22,790 for CGRP therapies). 4, 8

Second/Third-Line: CGRP-Targeted Therapies

  • Initiate CGRP mAbs when 2-3 traditional preventives have failed or are contraindicated, as most insurance requires documented failure of traditional agents before approval. 4, 8

  • Choose among CGRP mAbs based on:

    • Route preference: subcutaneous monthly/quarterly (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab) vs. intravenous quarterly (eptinezumab) 1, 3
    • Hypertension risk: avoid erenumab in patients with uncontrolled hypertension 4
    • Cost considerations: annual costs range $7,071-22,790 4
  • Consider oral gepants (atogepant) for patients preferring oral daily therapy over injections, though efficacy may be slightly lower than mAbs. 4, 7

Special Populations

  • For chronic migraine with obesity: Topiramate is particularly beneficial due to weight loss effects. 4, 8

  • For patients with medication overuse headache (MOH): Rule out and manage MOH first through medication withdrawal before initiating preventive therapy. 4, 8

  • For women of childbearing potential: Discuss adverse effects during pregnancy and lactation, as safety data for CGRP therapies in pregnancy remain limited. 4

Switching Among CGRP Therapies

  • If one CGRP mAb fails, switching to another may be viable due to pharmacological differences in target (peptide vs. receptor), structure, and pharmacokinetics. 9

  • Evaluate response after 3-6 months of treatment before declaring failure. 7

  • Consider pausing preventive treatment after 6-12 months of success to assess continued need. 7

Critical Cost Considerations

  • CGRP mAbs cost $7,071-22,790 annually compared to $100-300 for traditional preventives, making cost-effectiveness a major consideration. 4

  • Oral gepants cost $4,959-5,994 annually, positioning them between traditional preventives and mAbs. 4, 7

  • The American College of Physicians recommends prescribing less costly medications when appropriate, reserving CGRP therapies for third-line use. 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use CGRP therapies as first-line agents unless traditional preventives are contraindicated—insurance will deny coverage and cost-effectiveness is poor. 4, 8

  • Monitor for medication overuse headache with acute CGRP antagonists (threshold ≥10 days per month). 7

  • Do not declare treatment failure prematurely—allow 3-6 months for full therapeutic effect before switching agents. 7

  • Screen for hypertension before and during erenumab therapy due to increased risk compared to other CGRP mAbs. 4

  • Ensure adequate trial of traditional preventives (2-3 agents at therapeutic doses for sufficient duration) before advancing to CGRP therapies to satisfy insurance requirements and optimize cost-effectiveness. 4, 8

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

CGRP Inhibitors and Their Mechanisms

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Preventive Treatment of Migraine.

Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.), 2024

Guideline

Migraine Management with Qulipta and Ubrelvy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Chronic Migraine Treatment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.