What are the clinical manifestations, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment options for Charcot-Marie Tooth (CMT) disease in children?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 1, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease in Children

Overview

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease is the most common inherited peripheral neuropathy in children, characterized by progressive distal muscle weakness creating a "stork leg" appearance, sensory loss in a glove-and-stocking distribution, and bilateral pes cavovarus foot deformities, with diagnosis requiring electrodiagnostic studies followed by targeted genetic testing. 1

Clinical Manifestations

Motor Symptoms

  • Distal muscle weakness and atrophy beginning in the lower limbs, particularly affecting peroneal muscles, creating the characteristic "stork leg" appearance 1, 2
  • Progressive foot drop with steppage gait abnormalities 1
  • Weakness typically starts distally and progresses proximally over time 3
  • Symptoms usually begin in childhood or adolescence, though onset can occur at any age 1

Sensory Deficits

  • Sensory loss in "glove and stocking" distribution reflecting length-dependent axonal involvement 1, 2, 4
  • Decreased or absent deep tendon reflexes 1

Skeletal Deformities

  • Bilateral pes cavovarus (high arch with inverted heel) is the most common foot deformity 1
  • Foot deformities arise from chronic imbalance between intrinsic and extrinsic foot muscles 2
  • Clumsiness of gait and foot drop are early manifestations 5

Preserved Function

  • Cognitive function and development remain relatively normal, distinguishing CMT from other neurodevelopmental disorders 1

Diagnostic Evaluation

Step 1: Electrodiagnostic Studies (Essential First Step)

Electrodiagnostic studies are mandatory for proper classification and must be performed before genetic testing. 1, 4

  • Demyelinating forms (CMT1): Slowed nerve conduction velocities 1
  • Axonal forms (CMT2): Normal or slightly reduced conduction velocities with reduced amplitude 1
  • CMTX (X-linked): Asymmetric and nonhomogeneous conduction slowing that can mimic acquired inflammatory neuropathies 1

Step 2: Targeted Genetic Testing

Follow a stepwise approach based on electrophysiological findings rather than broad panel testing initially. 1, 4

First-Tier Testing Based on Electrophysiology:

For Demyelinating Forms:

  • Test for PMP22 gene duplication (CMT1A) first, as it accounts for approximately 70% of CMT1 cases 1, 2
  • Point mutations in PMP22 can also cause CMT1A with similar phenotypes 2

For Axonal Forms:

  • Test for MFN2 mutations first, accounting for approximately 33% of CMT2 cases 1, 2
  • MFN2 mutations disrupt mitochondrial fusion and axonal transport mechanisms 2

For Possible X-Linked Inheritance:

  • Test for Cx32(GJB1) mutations, accounting for approximately 12% of all CMT cases 1, 2

Genetic testing provides 100% specificity for established pathogenic mutations. 1, 4

Differential Diagnosis Considerations

CMT must be differentiated from acquired neuropathies including diabetic, toxic, or inflammatory neuropathies 1, 4

Common Diagnostic Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Failure to perform electrodiagnostic studies before genetic testing - this is the most critical error as it prevents proper classification 1
  • Overlooking hereditary causes in sporadic cases - 30% of mutations are de novo, so absence of family history does not exclude CMT 1
  • Incomplete genetic testing by not following the tiered approach based on electrophysiology 1
  • Misdiagnosing CMTX as acquired inflammatory neuropathy due to its asymmetric conduction slowing pattern 1
  • Assuming all cases have family history when many represent new mutations 1

Treatment Approach

Rehabilitation (Mainstay of Treatment)

Since no curative medical treatments exist and surgical outcomes are problematic, rehabilitation is the primary treatment modality. 3

Exercise Programs:

  • Aerobic exercise is effective in improving strength and general fitness 3
  • Strengthening exercises improve muscle function 3, 6
  • Stretching exercises are somewhat effective in maintaining range of motion 3, 6

Orthotic Management:

Orthotic devices are the mainstay of maintaining mobility, ambulation, and upper extremity function. 3

  • Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) for foot drop and gait stabilization 3
  • Upper extremity orthotics for hand function preservation 3

Multidisciplinary Care Components

Access to multidisciplinary care should be advocated for all children with CMT. 6

The following areas require management according to consensus-based recommendations:

  • Balance and mobility impairment 6
  • Sensory symptoms 6
  • Muscle cramps 6
  • Upper limb function impairment 6
  • Respiratory impairment monitoring 6
  • Joint range of motion maintenance 6
  • Non-surgical management of joint deformity 6

Emerging Therapies (Not Yet Standard of Care)

Currently, no effective drug treatment is available for CMT, though multiple approaches are under investigation. 7

Investigational approaches include:

  • PXT3003 is in the most advanced phase for CMT1A with an ongoing phase-III trial 7
  • Gene silencing approaches (ASO, siRNA, CRISPR-Cas9) targeting PMP22 overexpression in CMT1A 7
  • Gene therapy for recessive forms with loss-of-function mutations 7
  • HDAC6 inhibitors showing promise in improving axonal transport 7

Surgical Intervention

Surgery for skeletal deformities has problematic outcomes and should be reserved for severe cases. 3, 7

Key Clinical Pearls

  • CMT prevalence is approximately 1:2,500 people, making it the most common inherited neuromuscular disorder 1, 8
  • Inheritance patterns include autosomal dominant (most common), X-linked, and autosomal recessive 1
  • Over 40 genes are implicated in CMT, with constant revision as new genes are discovered 2, 8
  • Nerve biopsy is not routinely performed but may show characteristic ultrastructural features that can guide genetic testing 8
  • Clinical trials are ongoing for disease-modifying therapies, but none are currently approved 7, 8

References

Guideline

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Clinical Features and Diagnosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Pathogenesis and Clinical Manifestations of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Rehabilitation issues in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine, 2016

Guideline

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Clinical Characteristics and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Diagnosis of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology, 2009

Research

Clinical practice guideline for the management of paediatric Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2022

Research

The various Charcot-Marie-Tooth diseases.

Current opinion in neurology, 2013

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.