Can a patient with a history of pulmonary embolism (PE) who had transiently elevated Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) and High Sensitivity Troponin I (hs-TnI) levels, which later normalized, have had acute right ventricular strain or failure that resolved, and is it possible for them to have incurred permanent damage to the heart and lung?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 1, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Acute Right Ventricular Strain with Subsequent Complete Resolution

The elevated BNP (356 pg/ml) and high-sensitivity troponin I (0.12 ng/ml) at the time of pulmonary embolism represented acute right ventricular strain and myocardial injury from sudden pressure overload, which resolved completely as evidenced by normalization of biomarkers and imaging within 6 months—this indicates the patient had reversible right-sided heart dysfunction without permanent cardiac or pulmonary damage. 1, 2

What Happened During the Acute Event

Right Ventricular Dysfunction Mechanism

  • The pulmonary embolism caused sudden increased right ventricular afterload, leading to acute RV dilatation, increased myocardial oxygen consumption, and potential RV ischemia despite patent coronary arteries 1
  • This acute pressure overload triggered release of BNP from myocardial stretch and troponin from RV myocardial injury, both serving as markers of RV dysfunction severity 1, 2
  • The non-hypertrophied right ventricle in acute PE is particularly vulnerable to sudden afterload increases, making it less able to compensate compared to chronic pulmonary hypertension 1

Biomarker Interpretation

  • The troponin I level of 0.12 ng/ml was significantly elevated and associated with 5-17 fold increased mortality risk depending on the cutoff used 1, 2
  • The BNP of 356 pg/ml exceeded typical risk thresholds (usually 100-200 pg/ml cutoffs) and indicated substantial RV dysfunction 1
  • These elevations represented transmural RV injury from the acute pressure overload, not coronary artery disease 1, 3

Evidence for Complete Resolution

Reversibility of RV Dysfunction

  • Right ventricular dysfunction from acute PE is typically reversible when the embolic burden is treated, as the RV can recover once afterload normalizes 4, 3
  • The rapid normalization of biomarkers and resolution of pulmonary hypertension/RV dilatation within 6 months strongly indicates complete recovery without permanent damage 4
  • Studies demonstrate that RV dysfunction detected by echocardiography and elevated biomarkers in acute PE reflect acute hemodynamic stress rather than irreversible structural damage 1, 5

No Permanent Damage Indicators

  • The fact that both biomarkers returned to normal ranges and imaging showed resolution of RV changes indicates no permanent cardiac injury 4, 5
  • If permanent damage had occurred, you would expect persistent elevation of natriuretic peptides, ongoing RV dysfunction on imaging, or development of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension 1
  • The timeline of resolution (<6 months) is consistent with complete recovery patterns seen in acute PE without residual cardiopulmonary impairment 4

Clinical Significance at the Time

Risk Stratification

  • This patient had "submassive PE" (now termed intermediate-risk PE): acute PE without systemic hypotension but with evidence of RV dysfunction and myocardial necrosis 1
  • The combination of elevated troponin I and RV enlargement conferred approximately 10% in-hospital mortality risk 5
  • Both markers independently predicted adverse outcomes, with odds ratios of 5.90 for troponin elevation and 2.53 for RV dysfunction 1

Acute Right Heart Failure

  • Yes, the patient likely had acute right-sided heart failure at that time, defined by RV dilatation, elevated filling pressures, and compromised cardiac output 1, 4
  • This manifested as the acute RV strain pattern with biomarker elevation, representing the downward cycle of RV failure and ischemia described in acute massive PE 4
  • The RV dysfunction was severe enough to cause myocardial injury (troponin release) but not severe enough to cause hemodynamic collapse 1, 3

Key Clinical Pitfalls

Common Misinterpretations

  • Do not assume troponin elevation in PE indicates coronary artery disease—it reflects RV myocardial injury from acute pressure overload, not left ventricular ischemia 1, 6, 3
  • Elevated biomarkers in acute PE do not predict chronic complications when they normalize after treatment; they indicate acute severity only 2, 4
  • The absence of persistent biomarker elevation or imaging abnormalities essentially rules out permanent damage 4, 5

Prognostic Implications

  • NT-proBNP has higher sensitivity for RV dysfunction than troponin T in acute PE, though both are valuable 7
  • The negative predictive value of normal biomarkers is excellent (approaching 99% for ruling out adverse outcomes), but the positive predictive value is more modest (10-15% mortality risk) 1, 2
  • Serial measurements showing declining values (as occurred in this patient) confirm resolution rather than ongoing injury 2

Long-Term Outlook

This patient has no residual cardiac or pulmonary damage from the PE event, as evidenced by:

  • Complete normalization of biomarkers 2, 4
  • Resolution of pulmonary hypertension and RV dilatation 4
  • Timeline consistent with complete recovery (<6 months) 4

The acute elevation of BNP and troponin I represented a reversible stress response to the embolic event, not permanent structural damage 4, 3, 5

Related Questions

Can a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) cause elevated troponin levels?
Would aspirin and clopidogrel (antiplatelet agents) lower troponin levels in a patient with a pulmonary embolus?
Does a decrease in troponin levels indicate spontaneous resolution of pulmonary embolism (PE) or suggest septic cardiomyopathy in a septic patient?
Can troponin levels rise in a patient with extensive pulmonary embolism (PE)?
What does not constitute a marker of poor evolution of Pulmonary Thromboembolism (PE) and therefore does not justify the use of thrombolytics, such as Alteplase (tissue plasminogen activator): elevated troponins, sectoral hypokinesia of the right ventricle (RV) on echocardiogram, hemodynamic decompensation, or marked dilation of the right ventricle (RV) on chest Computed Tomography (CT)?
What is the recommended treatment approach for a patient with subacute or chronic fractures of the proximal diaphyseal of the third and fourth metatarsal bones, presenting with residual edema, and potentially having a history of osteoporosis or other bone health conditions?
What medication is recommended for an adult with a urinary tract infection (UTI) and a sinus infection?
What are the basics of electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation?
How is the dose of Synthroid (levothyroxine) adjusted when converting from oral to intravenous (IV) administration?
What is the best course of treatment for a patient with sinus bradycardia, supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), and rare ventricular ectopic beats (VE), with a maximum heart rate of tachycardia and a minimum heart rate of bradycardia, who is asymptomatic and possibly taking medications such as beta blockers?
What is a LIMA (Left Internal Mammary Artery) in the context of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.