What are the recommended tests for diagnosing a food allergy in a patient?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 2, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Testing for Food Allergy

The gold standard for diagnosing food allergy is the oral food challenge (double-blind, placebo-controlled), but in clinical practice, diagnosis relies on a structured approach combining detailed clinical history, skin prick testing or allergen-specific serum IgE testing to identify potential triggers, and oral food challenges when needed for confirmation. 1, 2

Initial Diagnostic Steps

Clinical History and Physical Examination

  • Obtain a detailed medical history focusing on symptoms occurring within minutes to hours after food ingestion, particularly if reactions have occurred on multiple occasions with the same food. 1, 2
  • Look specifically for anaphylaxis or combinations of symptoms including laryngeal edema, wheezing, urticaria, angioedema, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or hypotension. 1, 3
  • History and physical examination alone cannot diagnose food allergy—confirmation is mandatory because 50-90% of presumed food allergies are not true allergies. 1

Primary Laboratory Testing

Recommended Tests for IgE-Mediated Food Allergy

Skin Prick Testing (SPT)

  • Perform skin prick testing as the initial technique for detecting IgE-mediated food allergies, directed by clinical history. 1, 2
  • SPT assists in identifying foods provoking IgE-mediated reactions but alone cannot diagnose food allergy. 1

Allergen-Specific Serum IgE Testing

  • Order allergen-specific serum IgE testing as the primary laboratory test, using modern fluorescence-labeled antibody assays such as ImmunoCAP for optimal accuracy. 1, 2
  • A negative result (threshold <0.35 kUA/L) has high negative predictive value and effectively rules out IgE-mediated allergy. 2
  • Higher allergen-specific IgE levels correlate with increased probability of clinical reactivity, though predictive thresholds vary by allergen. 2
  • Positive results require clinical correlation—sensitization does not equal clinical allergy. 2, 4

Tests NOT Recommended

Avoid the following tests:

  • Do not use intradermal testing for food allergy diagnosis. 1
  • Do not measure total serum IgE routinely, as it lacks specificity for individual allergens. 1, 2, 4
  • Do not use atopy patch testing (APT) in routine evaluation of non-contact food allergies. 1, 2, 4
  • Do not use combinations of SPT, sIgE, and APT for routine diagnosis. 1

Confirmatory Testing

Oral Food Challenges

The double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge is the gold standard for definitive diagnosis. 1

When to use oral food challenges:

  • When history and laboratory tests are inconclusive or contradictory. 1, 5
  • To confirm suspected food allergy before implementing long-term dietary restrictions. 1
  • To determine if a food allergy has been outgrown. 3

Alternative challenge formats:

  • Single-blind or open-food challenges may be diagnostic under specific circumstances: negative challenges rule out food allergy; positive challenges with objective symptoms that correlate with history and laboratory tests support the diagnosis. 1

Advanced Testing for Specific Scenarios

Component-Resolved Diagnostics

  • Use component-resolved diagnostics (measuring IgE to specific allergen components) in specialized centers when standard tests are equivocal. 2
  • Examples include Ara h 2 for peanut, Ana o 3 for cashew, and Gal d 1,2,3,5 for egg. 2
  • This approach can reduce the need for oral food challenges by almost two-thirds when used in a 2-step algorithm. 2

Non-IgE-Mediated Food Allergies

Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome (FPIES)

  • Diagnose using medical history and oral food challenge. 1
  • When history indicates hypotensive episodes or multiple reactions to the same food, diagnosis may be based on history alone without challenge. 1

Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)

  • SPT, sIgE, and APT may help identify associated foods, but these tests alone are insufficient for diagnosis. 1
  • Use elimination diets targeting 1 or a few specific foods to identify responsible foods in EoE and other non-IgE-mediated disorders. 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never diagnose food allergy based on laboratory tests alone without clinical correlation. 2, 4
  • Do not use different laboratory assay systems interchangeably—predictive values from one system cannot be applied to another. 2, 4
  • Recognize that many patients have positive tests without clinical symptoms—sensitization does not equal clinical allergy. 2, 4
  • Do not accept patient or parent reports of food allergy without confirmation, as the majority are not true allergies. 1
  • Avoid presumptive diagnosis based solely on history and skin/serology tests except in cases of severe anaphylaxis after isolated ingestion of a specific food. 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Laboratory Tests for Allergy Diagnosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Food Allergy: Common Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2015

Guideline

Laboratory Testing for Indoor and Outdoor Allergies

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Diagnosis of food allergy.

Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2003

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.