What is the approach to using beta (beta blockers) in patients with sepsis, particularly those with underlying cardiovascular disease who are already on chronic beta blocker therapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 2, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Beta-Blocker Management in Sepsis

Continue beta-blockers in patients with sepsis who are already on chronic therapy for cardiovascular disease, but hold or reduce the dose if heart rate drops below 45-50 bpm or systolic blood pressure falls below 100 mmHg. 1

Approach to Chronic Beta-Blocker Therapy During Sepsis

For Patients Already Taking Beta-Blockers

The most critical principle is continuation rather than abrupt discontinuation. 1 Patients with underlying cardiovascular disease who are chronically on beta-blockers should have their therapy continued during sepsis, as abrupt discontinuation can precipitate rebound effects including severe exacerbations of angina, myocardial infarction, and ventricular arrhythmias. 2

Key hemodynamic thresholds for dose adjustment:

  • Hold or reduce dose if heart rate <45-50 bpm 1, 3
  • Hold or reduce dose if systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg 4, 1, 3
  • Consider dose reduction rather than complete discontinuation for mild hemodynamic instability 1

Critical Monitoring Parameters

Before each dose administration, assess:

  • Heart rate (target 50-60 bpm for optimal benefit) 1
  • Systolic blood pressure 3
  • Signs of tissue hypoperfusion or organ dysfunction 3
  • Alternative causes of tachycardia (infection progression, hypovolemia, pulmonary embolism, anemia) 4

A crucial caveat: The association between death due to sepsis and beta-blocker use in the POISE trial suggests that persistent tachycardia may indicate worsening sepsis or other complications rather than inadequate beta-blockade. 4 A thorough search for alternative causes of tachycardia is essential before attributing it solely to inadequate beta-blocker dosing.

Evidence for Mortality Benefit in Specific Populations

Patients with absolute tachycardia (HR ≥100 bpm) during sepsis may derive particular benefit from continued beta-blocker therapy. 5 An observational cohort study demonstrated that long-term beta-blocker therapy was associated with decreased 30-day mortality in septic patients exhibiting tachycardia (odds ratio 0.406,95% CI 0.177-0.932). 5

Selective beta-1 blockers appear superior to non-selective agents in this setting. 5 This finding aligns with the need to avoid excessive hemodynamic depression while still providing heart rate control and potential metabolic/immunomodulatory benefits.

Mechanism of Potential Benefit

Beta-blockers may provide benefit through multiple pathways beyond heart rate control:

  • Modulation of excessive catecholaminergic hyperactivity characteristic of sepsis 6
  • Anti-inflammatory effects 6, 7
  • Improved myocardial oxygen supply/demand balance 6
  • Metabolic and immunomodulatory properties 7

When to Avoid or Discontinue

Absolute contraindications during sepsis include: 1

  • Cardiogenic shock or high risk for shock
  • Active bronchospasm
  • Symptomatic bradycardia
  • Heart rate consistently <45 bpm
  • Decompensated heart failure
  • Advanced heart block

Relative contraindications requiring careful assessment:

  • Hypotension with systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg (may require temporary dose reduction or holding) 4, 3
  • Signs of tissue hypoperfusion despite adequate fluid resuscitation 3

Practical Algorithm

  1. Assess baseline status: Confirm patient is hemodynamically stable (not requiring IV inotropes, not in cardiogenic shock) 1

  2. Check vital signs before each dose:

    • If HR <45 bpm → Hold dose 1, 3
    • If HR 45-50 bpm → Consider holding or reducing dose 1
    • If SBP <90 mmHg → Hold dose 3
    • If SBP 90-100 mmHg → Use caution, consider dose reduction 3
  3. Investigate alternative causes if tachycardia persists:

    • Worsening sepsis/infection
    • Hypovolemia
    • Pulmonary embolism
    • Anemia
    • Pain or agitation 4
  4. Reassess after 2-4 hours if dose held for hypotension 3

  5. If hemodynamic instability persists, consider dose reduction rather than complete discontinuation 1

Important Caveats

The risk-benefit calculation differs from initiating beta-blockers in sepsis. While the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines do not specifically recommend initiating beta-blockers for sepsis treatment 4, the evidence supports continuation of chronic therapy in patients with cardiovascular indications. 1

Clinically significant hypotension from beta-blockers carries substantial risk. In the perioperative setting, hypotension was associated with an adjusted odds ratio for death and stroke of 4.97 (95% CI 3.62-6.81). 4, 3 This underscores the importance of vigilant hemodynamic monitoring.

Beta-blockers reduce mortality by 23% in post-MI patients, with greatest benefit in those with heart failure, systolic dysfunction, or ventricular arrhythmias. 1 This cardiovascular protection must be weighed against potential hemodynamic compromise during acute sepsis.

References

Guideline

Essential Knowledge for Beta-Blocker Prescribing

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Management of Metoprolol in Patients with Low Systolic Blood Pressure

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

β-Blockers, Tachycardia, and Survival Following Sepsis: An Observational Cohort Study.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021

Research

The role of beta-blockers in septic patients.

Minerva anestesiologica, 2015

Research

beta-Blockers in sepsis: reexamining the evidence.

Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2009

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.