Is PDL1 (Programmed Death-Ligand 1) testing needed for a patient with oropharyngeal cancer who has progressed on gemcitabine/cisplatin and paclitaxel/cisplatin before starting immunotherapy with nivolumab (Opdivo) or pembrolizumab (Keytruda)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 2, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

PD-L1 Testing for Oropharyngeal Cancer Before Immunotherapy

PD-L1 testing is NOT required before starting nivolumab or pembrolizumab in patients with platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic oropharyngeal cancer, though it provides prognostic information that may guide treatment selection between these agents.

Regulatory Approval and Treatment Access

  • Nivolumab is FDA-approved without PD-L1 testing requirements for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma that has progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy 1
  • Pembrolizumab is FDA-approved without mandatory PD-L1 testing in the same setting, though PD-L1 expression data can inform treatment decisions 1
  • Both agents can be initiated immediately without waiting for PD-L1 test results, as they work independently of PD-L1 expression 2

Evidence-Based Treatment Recommendations

Nivolumab (Category 1 Recommendation)

  • NCCN recommends nivolumab as a Category 1 option based on high-quality randomized trial evidence showing survival benefit over standard single-agent chemotherapy 1
  • Nivolumab prolongs overall survival regardless of PD-L1 status, though patients with PD-L1-positive tumors derive greater survival benefit 1
  • Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in only 13.1% of nivolumab-treated patients 1

Pembrolizumab (Category 2A Recommendation)

  • NCCN recommends pembrolizumab as a Category 2A option based on non-randomized trial data 1
  • In patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (≥1% expression), pembrolizumab achieved a 22% response rate versus only 4% in PD-L1-negative patients (P=0.021) 1
  • Overall response rate was 18% with 6-month OS of 59% in the expansion cohort 1

Clinical Decision Algorithm

When PD-L1 testing is available:

  • If PD-L1 CPS ≥1: Consider pembrolizumab for higher likelihood of response (22% vs 4%) 1, or nivolumab for Category 1 evidence and favorable toxicity profile 1
  • If PD-L1 negative: Prefer nivolumab given its Category 1 recommendation and proven survival benefit independent of PD-L1 status 1

When PD-L1 testing is unavailable or delayed:

  • Proceed immediately with nivolumab (preferred due to Category 1 evidence) 1
  • Do not delay treatment waiting for PD-L1 results 2

Important Caveats

  • PD-L1 testing definitions and scoring methods vary between trials, creating ambiguities in interpretation 1
  • PD-L1 expression is prognostic but not absolutely predictive—responses occur in PD-L1-negative patients with both agents 1
  • For first-line recurrent/metastatic disease with PD-L1 CPS ≥1, pembrolizumab combined with platinum/5-FU is a distinct treatment option with different approval criteria 1
  • The most recent ESMO guidelines (2020) validate PD-L1 IHC testing using FDA-approved assays specifically for identifying patients who may benefit from first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in recurrent/metastatic disease 1

Practical Implementation

  • Nivolumab dosing: 240 mg IV every 2 weeks 2
  • Pembrolizumab dosing: 200 mg IV every 3 weeks 1, 2
  • Both agents demonstrated durable responses in HPV-associated and non-HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers 1
  • Treatment should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting 1, 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Primary Treatment for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.