Skull X-Ray for Falls in Children: Not Recommended
Skull radiographs should NOT be routinely used for children who have experienced a fall, as they are insufficient to evaluate for intracranial injury and do not reliably predict clinically important traumatic brain injury. 1
Primary Imaging Approach Based on Clinical Risk
The decision to image depends on clinical assessment, not routine skull X-rays:
High-Risk Children (Require Immediate CT Head)
- Glasgow Coma Scale ≤13 (moderate to severe head trauma) 1
- Altered mental status or decreased level of consciousness 2, 3
- Focal neurological deficits 4, 2
- Signs of basilar skull fracture (hemotympanum, Battle's sign, raccoon eyes) 4
- Suspected depressed or penetrating skull fracture on clinical examination 2
Intermediate-Risk Children (Clinical Observation ± CT)
- Loss of consciousness at time of injury 4
- Persistent vomiting 5
- Severe mechanism of injury 5
- Palpable skull abnormality 5
These children should be hospitalized for 48-hour clinical observation without routine skull X-rays 4
Low-Risk Children (Discharge with Head Injury Instructions)
- Asymptomatic with normal neurological examination 4, 5
- No loss of consciousness 4
- Normal behavior and activity 5
Why Skull X-Rays Are Not Indicated
The evidence against routine skull radiography is compelling:
- Poor sensitivity for intracranial injury: 60% of children with epidural hematoma, 85% with subdural hematoma, and 35% with brain damage have NO skull fracture 4
- Low predictive value: Skull fracture on X-ray has only 65% sensitivity for intracranial injury with 83% negative predictive value, compared to 91% sensitivity and 97% negative predictive value for clinical neurological abnormalities 2
- Cannot detect intracranial pathology: Skull X-rays show only bone and cannot visualize hemorrhage, edema, or brain injury 1, 4
- Up to 50% of intracranial injuries occur without skull fracture 1
Special Circumstances Where Skull X-Ray May Be Considered
Suspected Non-Accidental Trauma (Child Abuse)
This is the primary indication for skull X-rays in modern pediatric practice:
- All infants 0-11 months with skull fractures should have skeletal survey (which includes skull films) to evaluate for abuse 1
- Exception: Infants 7-11 months with linear, unilateral skull fracture from witnessed high-height fall may not require full skeletal survey 1
- Complex or "ping-pong" skull fractures always warrant skeletal survey regardless of age 1
- Skull X-rays are part of the skeletal survey protocol when evaluating for multiple fractures and abuse patterns 1
Infants Under 2 Years
- The CDC guideline states skull radiographs should not be used for screening intracranial injury even in this age group 1
- However, if skull fracture is clinically suspected and CT is not immediately indicated, skull X-ray may help determine need for CT and neurosurgical consultation 5
- Clinical suspicion for skull fracture is itself a risk factor for intracranial injury in young children 1
The Correct Imaging Algorithm
When imaging IS clinically indicated:
CT head without contrast is the appropriate initial study for acute evaluation 1, 3
- Rapid acquisition
- Excellent sensitivity for hemorrhage, herniation, and fractures requiring intervention
- Can detect both intracranial injury AND skull fractures simultaneously
MRI head is reserved for:
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not be falsely reassured by normal skull X-rays - severe intracranial injury frequently occurs without fracture 4, 2
- Do not use skull X-rays to "rule out" significant injury - clinical examination is more predictive than skull films 2, 3
- Do not delay CT when clinically indicated by obtaining skull X-rays first 3
- Emergency department staff miss 23% of skull fractures on X-ray, further limiting utility 2
Cost and Radiation Considerations
Eliminating routine skull X-rays can reduce approximately 2,000 unnecessary radiographs per year in a typical pediatric emergency department without increasing missed injuries or hospital admissions 4. Children under 5 years are at higher risk from radiation exposure, making the avoidance of unnecessary imaging particularly important 4.