Is radiofrequency (RF) cautery a suitable treatment option for a patient with seborrhic keratosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 3, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Radiofrequency Cautery for Seborrheic Keratosis

Yes, radiofrequency (RF) cautery is a well-established and effective treatment option for seborrheic keratosis, commonly used alongside other destructive modalities like electrodesiccation and curettage.

Treatment Rationale

Seborrheic keratosis (SK) is a benign epidermal tumor that does not require removal for medical reasons unless histologic confirmation is needed or lesions become traumatized and symptomatic 1. However, these lesions frequently prompt cosmetic concerns and are commonly treated by dermatologists 1.

Standard Treatment Approaches

Primary Treatment Modalities

  • Cryosurgery remains the most commonly employed removal method for SK among dermatologists 1.

  • Electrodesiccation, curettage, and shave excision are other frequently used techniques, often in combination 1.

  • RF cautery (electrocautery) is explicitly recognized as a traditional and effective treatment option for SK, with comparable efficacy to cryosurgery 2, 3.

  • Dermatologists treat approximately 43% of SK patients presenting for evaluation, indicating selective treatment based on patient preference and lesion characteristics 1.

Treatment Selection Considerations

  • Careful patient selection is required to optimize cosmetic results, particularly in patients with skin of color, thick lesions, or numerous lesions 1.

  • All destructive methods (including RF cautery, cryosurgery, and electrodesiccation) can occasionally cause post-procedure depigmentation, scarring, and recurrence 3.

  • Treatment should be selected based on lesion location, thickness, number of lesions, patient skin type, and cosmetic expectations 1, 4.

Alternative and Emerging Options

Laser Therapy

  • Ablative CO2 and Er:YAG lasers achieve single-session clearance in up to 90% of lesions, with recurrence rates of 0-6% at 12-month follow-up 5.

  • Laser therapy is particularly advantageous when cosmesis is paramount, serving as a safe alternative to cryotherapy, curettage, and electrosurgery 5.

  • Patient satisfaction with laser treatment ranges from 64-95%, with generally mild and transient adverse events 5.

Topical Treatments

  • No effective topical therapeutic agent has been developed for SK, representing an area of unmet need despite significant interest from patients and providers 1.

  • One case report describes successful treatment with Siddha medicine (Pachaieruvai), but this lacks robust evidence and is not standard practice 2.

Common Pitfalls

  • Avoid using destructive techniques in patients with darker skin types without careful consideration, as post-inflammatory dyschromia is more likely 1, 5.

  • Do not assume all pigmented lesions are SK—if diagnostic uncertainty exists, biopsy should be performed before destructive treatment 1.

  • Multiple thick lesions may be better suited to laser therapy or shave excision rather than RF cautery to minimize scarring 1, 5.

References

Research

Seborrheic keratosis.

Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG, 2023

Research

Advances in Laser Treatments for Seborrheic Keratosis: A Scoping Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Patient Outcomes.

Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.], 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.