What is the significance of the Guy stone score in predicting the complexity and success of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 3, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Guy Stone Score in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Overview and Clinical Utility

The Guy Stone Score (GSS) is a validated, reproducible grading system that accurately predicts stone-free rates, operative complexity, and complication risk in PCNL, and should be routinely used for preoperative risk stratification and patient counseling. 1

The GSS comprises four grades based on stone location, burden, and collecting system anatomy 1:

  • Grade I: Solitary stone in mid/lower pole OR solitary stone in pelvis with simple anatomy 1
  • Grade II: Solitary stone in upper pole OR multiple stones with simple anatomy OR solitary stone with abnormal anatomy 1
  • Grade III: Multiple stones with abnormal anatomy OR stones in caliceal diverticulum OR partial staghorn calculus 1
  • Grade IV: Complete staghorn calculus OR any stone in patients with spina bifida or spinal injury 1

Predictive Value for Stone-Free Rates

The GSS demonstrates strong inverse correlation between stone complexity and success rates 2, 1:

  • GSS Grade I: 87.9-96.4% stone-free rate 2, 3
  • GSS Grade II: 62.1-84.8% stone-free rate 2, 3
  • GSS Grade III: 44.0-76.6% stone-free rate 2, 3
  • GSS Grade IV: 20-50% stone-free rate 2, 3

The GSS was the only independent predictor of stone-free rates in multivariate analysis, outperforming stone burden, patient weight, age, and comorbidity 1. In a high-volume center with over 1,000 procedures, GSS maintained its predictive accuracy with statistical significance (P < 0.001) 2.

Prediction of Operative Complexity and Resource Utilization

Higher GSS grades correlate significantly with increased procedural demands 2:

  • Number of puncture tracts: GSS Grade III-IV patients require multiple access sites in 10-50% of cases (P < 0.001) 2, 4
  • Operating time: Mean increases progressively from Grade I to IV (P < 0.001) 2
  • Fluoroscopy time: Significantly longer with higher grades (P < 0.001) 2
  • Hospital length of stay: Directly proportional to GSS grade (P < 0.001) 2

Complication Risk Stratification

The GSS predicts complication rates with statistical significance (P < 0.001) 2:

  • Blood transfusion requirement: Increases with higher GSS grades, with hemorrhage requiring transfusion occurring in 4-15% of PCNL cases overall 2, 5, 6
  • Overall complications: 14.9% across all grades, but significantly higher in Grade III-IV 2
  • Septic shock: 4% overall, 10% in pyonephrosis cases 5

The Society of Interventional Radiology establishes minimum technical success thresholds of 85% for complex stone disease including staghorn calculi 5, which aligns with GSS Grade III-IV outcomes.

Clinical Application Algorithm

For preoperative planning:

  1. Calculate GSS from preoperative CT imaging to classify stone complexity 2, 1
  2. GSS Grade I-II: Proceed with standard single-access PCNL; expect >70% stone-free rate with single procedure 2, 3
  3. GSS Grade III: Plan for potential multiple access sites or staged procedures; counsel patients on 44-77% stone-free rate and possible need for auxiliary procedures 2, 3
  4. GSS Grade IV: Consider combination therapy (PCNL + flexible nephroscopy); counsel patients on 20-50% stone-free rate and high likelihood of staged procedures 2, 3, 5

For patient counseling on auxiliary procedure risk:

  • GSS Grade II: 4.85-fold increased odds of requiring additional treatment versus Grade I (P = 0.05) 3
  • GSS Grade III: 8.25-fold increased odds (P = 0.008) 3
  • GSS Grade IV: 27-fold increased odds (P < 0.0001) 3

Reproducibility and Validation

The GSS demonstrates excellent inter-rater reliability with kappa coefficient of 0.81, indicating good reproducibility across different operators 1. Multiple validation studies across different centers confirm its predictive accuracy 2, 3, 7.

Critical Technical Considerations Based on GSS

Regardless of GSS grade, flexible nephroscopy must be routinely performed to access stone fragments that migrate to areas inaccessible with rigid nephroscopy, particularly critical in Grade III-IV cases with complex anatomy 5, 6. Normal saline irrigation is mandatory to prevent hemolysis and electrolyte abnormalities 5, 6.

For GSS Grade III-IV cases, upper pole access typically provides optimal visualization of the complete collecting system, though multiple tracts may be necessary 4. The supine position offers advantages for simultaneous retrograde access in complex anatomy 4, 6.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Underestimating complexity: Failing to calculate GSS preoperatively leads to inadequate patient counseling and unrealistic expectations 8, 1
  • Single-procedure expectation for Grade III-IV: These patients average 1.3 PCNL procedures for complete clearance 5
  • Omitting flexible nephroscopy: This is critical for achieving stone-free status, especially in higher GSS grades 5, 4
  • Proceeding with active infection: Always establish drainage and control infection before stone fragmentation in any GSS grade 4, 9

References

Guideline

Management of Lower Calyceal Stones with Double Collector System via Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

PCNL Access Approaches and Calyceal Selection

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Lower Pole Kidney Stone Causing Pain

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.