Shockable Rhythms in Adult Cardiac Arrest
Shockable rhythms are ventricular fibrillation (VF) and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT), which are the only two cardiac arrest rhythms that require immediate defibrillation. 1, 2
Definition and Core Characteristics
Shockable rhythms consist exclusively of:
- Ventricular fibrillation (VF): Chaotic, disorganized electrical activity with no coordinated ventricular contraction 3, 1
- Pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT): Rapid ventricular rhythm without a detectable pulse 3, 1
These rhythms are distinguished from non-shockable rhythms (asystole and pulseless electrical activity), which do not respond to defibrillation and require a different treatment pathway. 1, 2
Clinical Significance and Prognosis
Patients with shockable rhythms have dramatically better survival outcomes compared to non-shockable rhythms. 1 VF is the most common primary rhythm in adult sudden cardiac arrest, particularly in patients with underlying ischemic heart disease. 3, 2
Critical timing factors:
- Over 80% of successful defibrillations occur within the first three shocks 3, 1
- Survival probability decreases progressively with each minute of delay between arrest onset and defibrillation 2
- At least 20% of patients with VF/pVT will remain in a shockable rhythm after 3 shocks, with survival decreasing as the number of required defibrillation attempts increases 3
Recognition and Diagnosis
On cardiac monitoring, you must identify:
- VF: Irregular, chaotic waveform with no discernible QRS complexes, varying amplitude and frequency 3
- Pulseless VT: Wide-complex tachycardia (typically >150-180 beats/min) without a palpable pulse 3, 4
Important caveat: Not all ventricular tachycardias are shockable—the critical distinction is whether the patient has a pulse. VT with a pulse requires synchronized cardioversion, while pulseless VT is treated identically to VF with immediate unsynchronized defibrillation. 1, 5
Automated External Defibrillator (AED) Performance
AEDs demonstrate excellent accuracy in rhythm recognition:
- Specificity for non-shockable rhythms: 99-100% (rarely misidentifies non-shockable rhythms as shockable) 1
- Sensitivity for VF: 94-96% 1
- Sensitivity for rapid VT: 60-71% (lower detection rate, particularly for slower VT) 1, 4
This means AEDs may occasionally miss rapid VT but virtually never inappropriately shock a non-shockable rhythm. 4
Treatment Algorithm
Immediate management priorities:
Confirm cardiac arrest: Unresponsiveness, no pulse, no normal breathing 2
Attach monitor/defibrillator immediately to assess rhythm 2
If VF or pulseless VT is identified:
Immediately after shock:
After 2 minutes of CPR:
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Critical errors that worsen outcomes:
- Delaying defibrillation to establish airway or IV access when VF/pVT is present—the first shock must be given without delay 2
- Checking pulse after every shock—only check if the waveform changes to one compatible with cardiac output 3, 2
- Misinterpreting post-shock asystole—the monitor often shows a flat line for several seconds after shock due to electrical/myocardial "stunning," which does not mean the rhythm has converted to asystole 3
- Confusing VT with pulse for pulseless VT—always confirm pulse status, as treatment differs dramatically 1, 5
Why These Rhythms Are Shockable
VF and pulseless VT are amenable to defibrillation because the electrical shock can depolarize a critical mass of myocardium simultaneously, allowing the heart's intrinsic pacemaker to potentially re-establish organized electrical activity. 3 In contrast, asystole (no electrical activity) and PEA (organized electrical activity without mechanical contraction) cannot be "reset" by electrical shock and have much worse prognosis. 2