Diagnosing Dyslexia
Dyslexia diagnosis requires standardized reading and spelling tests combined with psychological evaluation, excluding IQ-achievement discrepancy models in favor of direct assessment of phonological processing, word decoding accuracy and speed, and reading comprehension. 1, 2, 3
Core Diagnostic Components
Essential Testing Battery
Administer norm-referenced standardized tests that specifically measure word decoding accuracy, reading fluency (speed), spelling ability, and phonological processing skills—these are the hallmark deficits in dyslexia 1, 3
Use validated instruments such as the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP-2) to assess phonological awareness, phonological memory, and rapid naming abilities 1
Measure reading achievement with tools like the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Achievement to quantify deficits in word reading, pseudoword decoding, and reading comprehension 1
Include criterion-referenced assessments such as the Gallistel-Ellis Test of Coding Skills or Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) to identify specific skill gaps 1
Critical Cognitive Domains to Evaluate
Assess phonological processing specifically, including the ability to recognize and manipulate basic speech sounds, as this represents the core cognitive deficit in dyslexia 3, 4
Evaluate language memory and letter-sound learning, as these cognitive difficulties distinguish dyslexia from other learning problems 3
Do not use IQ-achievement discrepancy models—the IQ score does not play a role in diagnosing dyslexia, as the condition exists across the intelligence spectrum 3, 4
Comprehensive Evaluation Framework
Psychological and Behavioral Assessment
Screen for comorbid psychological conditions in all cases, as 40-60% of dyslexic children have anxiety, depression, or attention deficit disorders that require separate intervention 2
Obtain detailed developmental and educational history from parents and teachers, documenting when reading difficulties first emerged and their impact on academic performance 2, 4
Assess the child's psychological state using standardized measures to identify secondary emotional consequences of reading failure 2
Functional Impact Documentation
Document specific academic difficulties including missed assignments, inability to complete grade-level reading tasks, avoidance of reading activities, and declining school performance 2, 4
Evaluate the severity and persistence of reading problems across multiple contexts (classroom, homework, standardized testing) to establish that difficulties are not situational 4
Diagnostic Approach Algorithm
Step 1: Universal Screening and Referral
- Implement universal screening in early elementary grades to identify at-risk students before they experience academic failure 1, 2
Step 2: Comprehensive Diagnostic Testing
- Conduct the full battery of standardized reading, spelling, and phonological processing tests when screening indicates significant difficulty 1, 2
Step 3: Differential Diagnosis
- Rule out other causes including inadequate instruction, sensory impairments (vision/hearing), intellectual disability, neurological conditions, or primary language differences 2, 3
Step 4: Multiaxial Classification
- Establish diagnosis using a multiaxial classification system that documents the reading disorder, any comorbid psychological conditions, relevant medical factors, psychosocial stressors, and overall functional impairment 2
Common Diagnostic Pitfalls
Avoid waiting for "response to intervention" failure before conducting comprehensive evaluation—early diagnosis enables earlier intervention, which is more effective 2, 4
Do not dismiss reading difficulties as "developmental lag" or assume children will "grow out of it"—dyslexia is a persistent neurological condition requiring specific intervention 2, 3
Recognize that dyslexia exists on a continuum—any cutoff point for diagnosis is somewhat arbitrary, so clinical judgment about functional impairment is essential 3
Consider genetic and neurological basis—dyslexia has documented brain differences and strong heritability, making family history relevant to assessment 3