What are the blood testing biomarkers and optimal ranges for a general adult population?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 5, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Blood Testing Biomarkers and Optimal Ranges for General Adult Population

For general adult health screening, the most essential blood biomarkers include metabolic markers (glucose/HbA1c, lipid panel), liver function tests (ALT, AST, ALP, GGT, bilirubin, albumin), kidney function (creatinine/eGFR), complete blood count, and inflammatory markers (CRP), with specific optimal ranges varying by age, sex, and individual risk factors. 1

Core Metabolic Screening

Diabetes and Prediabetes Markers

  • Fasting plasma glucose should be measured as the preferred initial test, with normal values <100 mg/dL, prediabetes 100-125 mg/dL (IFG), and diabetes ≥126 mg/dL 1
  • Hemoglobin A1C serves as an equally appropriate alternative, with normal <5.7%, prediabetes 5.7-6.4%, and diabetes ≥6.5% 1, 2
  • Testing should begin at age 35 years for all adults, or earlier (any age) in those with BMI ≥25 kg/m² (≥23 kg/m² in Asian Americans) plus any additional risk factor 1
  • Repeat testing intervals: every 3 years minimum if normal; annually if prediabetes is identified 1, 2

Lipid Panel Components

  • Total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides should be measured together as a comprehensive lipid profile 2
  • HDL cholesterol <35 mg/dL (0.90 mmol/L) and/or triglycerides >250 mg/dL (2.82 mmol/L) indicate increased cardiovascular risk requiring intervention 1
  • Lipid stability over 4-12 years ranges from 0.65 to 0.37, similar to blood pressure stability, supporting repeat measurement every 4-6 years in healthy adults starting at age 20 1

Liver Function Assessment

Standard Liver Panel

  • Initial liver investigation must include bilirubin, albumin, ALT, ALP, and GGT, together with full blood count 1
  • Abnormal results (outside laboratory reference range) warrant investigation regardless of the degree of elevation 1
  • The pattern of elevation (hepatocellular vs. cholestatic) guides subsequent diagnostic workup 1

Liver Aetiology Screen Components

  • Standard adult screen should include: abdominal ultrasound, hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody with reflex PCR, anti-mitochondrial antibody, anti-smooth muscle antibody, antinuclear antibody, serum immunoglobulins, simultaneous ferritin and transferrin saturation 1
  • For suspected NAFLD with metabolic syndrome, risk stratification using FIB-4 or NAFLD Fibrosis Score should be incorporated into primary care systems 1

Kidney Function and Anemia Markers

Renal Function Assessment

  • eGFR provides the most accurate assessment of kidney function, with stages defined as: Stage 1 (≥90 mL/min/1.73 m²), Stage 2 (60-89), Stage 3 (30-59), Stage 4 (15-29), Stage 5 (<15) 1
  • Anemia prevalence increases significantly when eGFR falls below 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (Stage 3 CKD) 1

Hemoglobin Optimal Ranges

  • Males: Hemoglobin <13.0 g/dL defines anemia 1
  • Females: Hemoglobin <12.0 g/dL defines anemia 1, 3
  • Mean hemoglobin levels decrease consistently only when GFR drops below 60 mL/min/1.73 m² 1
  • Patients with diabetes develop anemia 2-3 times more frequently at all GFR levels compared to non-diabetics 1

Iron Studies for Anemia Evaluation

  • Complete iron panel should include ferritin, transferrin saturation, serum iron, and total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) 3
  • Low ferritin, low transferrin saturation, low iron, raised TIBC, and increased serum transferrin receptor indicate iron deficiency 3
  • Iron deficiency without anemia is a recognized clinical entity requiring investigation and treatment 3

Cardiovascular and Inflammatory Biomarkers

High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

  • CRP demonstrates strong stability over intervals <6 months (correlation ~0.79), modest to moderate stability over 6 months to 3 years, and lower stability over periods >3 years 1
  • Two measurements taken 2 weeks apart are recommended to determine 10-year CHD risk, though repeat assessment every 1-3 years may be necessary for accurate risk prediction 1
  • CRP stability estimates (0.65-0.88 over 6 months to 1 year) approximate those of blood pressure and lipid levels over similar periods 1

Cardiac Biomarkers for Risk Stratification

  • High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and NT-proBNP identify individuals with elevated blood pressure or hypertension at highest risk for cardiovascular events and heart failure 1
  • These biomarkers detect chronic myocardial injury and stress, identifying intermediate phenotypes along the progression from hypertension to clinical heart failure 1
  • Elevated biomarker levels can identify individuals with stage 1 hypertension (BP 130-139/80-89 mmHg) who may benefit from antihypertensive medication beyond traditional risk assessment 1

Interleukin-6 (IL-6)

  • IL-6 stability mirrors CRP, with strong stability <6 months, modest stability 6 months to 3 years 1
  • IL-6 independently classifies clinical CVD and predicts all-cause mortality in high-risk populations, demonstrating robustness as a prognostic biomarker 4
  • Repeated measurement every 6 months to 3 years may be necessary to accurately characterize health risk 1

Blood Pressure Assessment

  • Hypertension threshold per 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines: ≥130/80 mmHg 1
  • Clinical guidelines recommend reassessment every 1-2 years for healthy adults 1
  • Blood pressure stability over 2-12 years ranges from 0.61 to 0.35 for systolic BP, with slightly lower estimates for diastolic BP 1

Testing Frequency and Stability Considerations

General Principles for Biomarker Monitoring

  • Single measurements of most inflammatory biomarkers provide reliable indices of stable individual differences in the short term (<6 months) 1
  • Repeated assessments are necessary over intervals >6 months to accurately estimate future health risk, with measurements repeated at minimum every 3 years 1
  • Momentary exposures (acute stress, pollution) impact circulating levels, so repeated measurement in the short term (days to weeks) may provide more accurate measures of individual differences 1

Biomarker Variability Factors

  • Most biomarkers demonstrate heterogeneity due to between-subjects factors (age, sex, fasting state) rather than analytic factors (assay differences) 1
  • Diurnal variation and inter-/intravariability in assays must be considered when interpreting results 5
  • Dynamic nature of risk in real-world settings (aging, incident risk factors) may affect biomarker interpretation over time 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not delay diabetes screening until age 35 in patients with BMI ≥25 kg/m² who have additional risk factors; severe obesity (BMI ≥40 kg/m²) qualifies as high-risk requiring immediate screening 1, 2
  • Do not use A1C in conditions with altered red blood cell turnover (hemolytic anemia, recent blood loss); use only glucose-based criteria in these situations 1, 2
  • Do not interpret liver tests in isolation; always review previous results, past medical history, and current clinical context before determining significance 1
  • Do not assume normal hemoglobin excludes iron deficiency; iron deficiency can cause symptoms even before hemoglobin drops below normal thresholds 3
  • Do not rely on single biomarker measurements for long-term risk prediction; inflammatory markers require repeat testing every 3 years minimum to maintain accuracy 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Screening for Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Severe Obesity

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Anemia in Adult Females

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality Risk in Patients with Advanced CKD.

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2016

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.