Determining Autism Spectrum Disorder Type and Etiology
Modern diagnostic frameworks no longer classify autism into distinct "types"—DSM-5 consolidated all previous subtypes (Asperger's, PDD-NOS, autistic disorder) into a single diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder, so the focus is now on identifying the underlying etiology and characterizing severity across two core domains: social communication deficits and restricted/repetitive behaviors. 1, 2
Initial Diagnostic Confirmation
Before pursuing any etiologic workup, confirm the ASD diagnosis itself through:
- Evaluation by a trained professional using standardized diagnostic tools—specifically the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Second Edition (ADOS-2, sensitivity 91%, specificity 76%) and Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R, sensitivity 80%, specificity 72%) 3, 2
- Formal audiogram to rule out hearing loss that could mimic ASD symptoms—this is mandatory before proceeding, as hearing impairment can present with similar social-communication difficulties 1, 3, 2
- Cognitive and adaptive skills testing to establish baseline developmental level and frame social difficulties relative to overall functioning 1, 2
Identifying the Underlying Etiology: Tiered Genetic Evaluation
A clinical genetics evaluation identifies an underlying cause in 30-40% of individuals with ASD, which directly impacts medical management, family counseling, and recurrence risk estimation. 3, 2
Pre-Evaluation Requirements
- Verify newborn screening results 1
- Obtain EEG only if clinical suspicion of seizures exists 1
- Consider Landau-Kleffner syndrome evaluation (EEG) when marked aphasia develops 2
First-Tier Testing (Order Initially for All)
- Physical examination by clinical geneticist/dysmorphologist focusing on dysmorphic features—this remains high-yield and low-cost for distinguishing syndromic from isolated ASD 1, 2
- Woods lamp examination for tuberous sclerosis signs 1, 2
- Chromosomal microarray (CMA): 10% diagnostic yield—now standard of care as first-line genetic test 1, 3, 2
- Fragile X DNA testing: 1-5% yield 3, 2
- High-resolution karyotype: 3% yield (if not already performed) 1, 3
Metabolic Screening (Only If Clinical Indicators Present)
Order these only when specific clinical features warrant:
- Urine mucopolysaccharides and organic acids 1
- Serum lactate, amino acids, ammonia, and acyl-carnitine profile 1
- Rubella titers if clinical indicators present 1
Second-Tier Testing (Based on Specific Clinical Features)
- MECP2 gene testing in females only: 4% yield 1, 3, 2
- PTEN gene testing if head circumference >2.5 standard deviations above mean: 5% yield 1, 3, 2
- Fibroblast karyotype if leukocyte karyotype normal but clonal pigmentary abnormalities noted 1
Third-Tier Testing (For Specific Clinical Scenarios)
- Brain MRI (not routine—only when neurologic features warrant) 1, 2
- Serum and urine uric acid with follow-up enzyme testing if abnormal 1
Characterizing ASD Severity and Co-occurring Conditions
Beyond identifying etiology, characterize the individual's presentation across these dimensions:
Intellectual Disability Assessment
- 39.6% of children with ASD have co-occurring intellectual disability, with higher rates among Black (52.8%), AI/AN (50.0%), and A/PI (43.9%) children compared to White (32.7%) and multiracial (31.2%) children 4
- Cognitive testing reveals considerable scatter with possible splinter skills or savant abilities in specific domains 2
Psychiatric Comorbidity Screening
- Approximately 75% of children with ASD have comorbid psychiatric conditions including ADHD, anxiety disorders, mood disorders, and Tourette syndrome 3, 5
- Screen systematically for these conditions as they require separate management 1, 5
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not order extensive genetic testing without clinical geneticist evaluation first—the stepwise approach is more cost-effective and better tolerated by families than shotgun testing 3, 2
- Do not delay diagnosis waiting for genetic results—the ASD diagnosis itself is clinical and should not be held up by etiologic workup 1
- Do not fail to provide recurrence risk counseling even when no etiology is identified: full sibling recurrence risk is 3-10% (7% if affected child is female, 4% if male), rising to at least 30% with two or more affected children 3, 2
- Do not assume lower IQ predicts positive genetic findings—recent data shows IQ is not a strong predictor of chromosomal abnormalities 1
Ongoing Management
- Schedule periodic reevaluations for patients without definitive etiology, as diagnostic technology continues to evolve 3, 2
- Establish a primary care medical home to coordinate ongoing care 1, 2
- Refer for intensive behavioral interventions (first-line therapy, particularly for children ≤5 years) focusing on language, play, and social communication 3, 2
- Reserve pharmacotherapy for co-occurring conditions and specific symptoms, not core ASD features 3, 2