Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Head Cancer
For resectable pancreatic head cancer, perform pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure) with the goal of achieving R0 resection (negative margins), followed by 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine or 5-FU. 1
Preoperative Assessment and Resectability Determination
Before proceeding to surgery, establish resectability through multidisciplinary consultation with high-quality cross-sectional imaging 1:
Resectable criteria: No arterial tumor contact with celiac axis (CA) or superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and venous involvement of superior mesenteric vein (SMV)/portal vein (PV) allowing safe resection and reconstruction 1
Borderline resectable criteria: Solid tumor contact with SMA ≤180°, solid tumor contact with CA ≤180°, or solid tumor contact with the first jejunal SMA branch 1
Unresectable criteria: Solid tumor contact with SMA >180°, solid tumor contact with CA >180°, or unreconstructible SMV/PV due to tumor involvement 1
Surgical Technique for Pancreaticoduodenectomy
The operation must be performed by surgeons experienced in managing tumor-vessel involvement, with mortality rates <5% in experienced centers 1:
Key Technical Elements
Meticulous perivascular dissection: Complete mobilization of PV and SMV from the uncinate process, with skeletonization of the lateral, posterior, and anterior borders of the SMA down to the level of adventitia to maximize uncinate yield and radial margin 1
Vascular resection when necessary: Perform lateral venorrhaphy or complete portal/SMV resection and reconstruction if tumor infiltration is suspected, as data support aggressive approach to partial or complete vein excision 1
Standard lymphadenectomy only: Dissect lymph nodes of the hepatoduodenal ligament, common hepatic artery, portal vein, right-sided celiac artery lymph node, and lymph nodes at the right half of the superior mesenteric artery—extended lymphadenectomy provides no benefit 1
Margin Status and Pathologic Evaluation
R0 resection is the primary goal: Complete tumor resection with all margins negative is the strongest prognostic indicator for long-term survival, though microscopic margin involvement occurs in >75% of cases even with meticulous surgery 1
Document lymph node ratio (LNR): An LNR ≥0.2 (number of involved lymph nodes/number of examined lymph nodes) is a negative prognostic factor 1
R1 resection still warrants adjuvant therapy: Patients benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy even after R1 resection (microscopic positive margins) 1
Adjuvant Therapy
All patients who undergo resection must receive 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy with either gemcitabine or 5-FU 1:
This improves 5-year survival from approximately 9% to 20% 1
Adjuvant chemoradiation should only be performed within randomized controlled clinical trials 1
Special Considerations for Elderly Patients
Elderly patients do benefit from radical surgery, but comorbidity becomes the critical limiting factor, especially in patients older than 75-80 years 1
Age alone should not preclude surgery if performance status and comorbidities are acceptable 1
Borderline Resectable Disease
For borderline resectable tumors with vessel encasement 1:
Consider neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy to achieve tumor downsizing and conversion to resectable status 1
The development of effective multiagent chemotherapy regimens has enabled resection in approximately 24% of patients with borderline resectable disease following neoadjuvant therapy 1
Patients who develop metastases during neoadjuvant chemotherapy or who progress locally are not candidates for surgery 1
Expected Outcomes
Median survival of resected patients ranges from 15 to 19 months 1
5-year survival rate is approximately 20% 1
Negative margin status (R0 resection), tumor size, and absence of lymph node metastases are the strongest prognostic indicators 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not perform extended lymphadenectomy: There is no evidence of benefit, and it increases morbidity 1
Do not proceed with surgery if progression occurs during neoadjuvant therapy: This indicates aggressive tumor biology and futility of resection 1
Ensure appropriate surgical margins are inked and documented: Wide variation exists in reported R1 rates due to inconsistent pathologic examination protocols 1