How should I interpret a transthoracic echocardiogram in a 65‑year‑old male that shows a normal left‑ventricular ejection fraction of 66 % but hypokinesis of the basal inferior and basal inferolateral walls, with normal right‑ventricular function, normal inferior vena cava collapse, no pericardial effusion, and no hemodynamically significant valvular abnormalities, and what are the recommended next steps?

Interpretation of Echocardiogram Findings

This echocardiogram reveals regional wall motion abnormalities (hypokinesis of the basal inferior and basal inferolateral walls) in the setting of preserved global left ventricular systolic function, which strongly suggests prior myocardial infarction in the distribution of the right coronary artery or left circumflex artery territory, and mandates urgent evaluation for coronary artery disease. 1

Key Findings Analysis

Left Ventricular Function

• The ejection fraction of 66% is normal (normal range 53-73% by biplane method of discs), indicating preserved global systolic function 1, 2
• However, normal EF does not exclude significant coronary disease when regional wall motion abnormalities are present 3
• The specific pattern of hypokinesis in the basal inferior and basal inferolateral segments indicates regional myocardial dysfunction despite preserved overall pump function 4

Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities - Critical Finding

• Hypokinesis of the basal inferior and basal inferolateral walls represents a significant abnormality that typically corresponds to the vascular territory of either the right coronary artery (RCA) or left circumflex artery (LCX) 5, 4
• This pattern is highly suggestive of prior myocardial infarction or ongoing ischemia in these territories 6, 4
• Research demonstrates that inferior wall motion abnormalities, even when mild, correlate with significant coronary stenosis in 52.7% of cases on angiography 5
• The basal inferolateral involvement specifically suggests LCX territory disease, which is frequently underdiagnosed 5

Right Ventricular Assessment

• TAPSE of 2.0 cm is normal (normal ≥1.7 cm), indicating preserved right ventricular systolic function 6
• Normal IVC collapse >50% confirms normal right atrial pressure of 3 mmHg, effectively ruling out significant pulmonary hypertension or right heart failure 6
• This excludes pulmonary embolism as a cause of the wall motion abnormalities, as PE typically causes RV dysfunction with dilated, non-collapsing IVC 6

Recommended Next Steps - Algorithmic Approach

Immediate Actions (Within 24-48 Hours)

1. Obtain 12-lead ECG immediately to assess for:

   • Inferior Q waves (suggesting prior inferior MI) 6
   • ST-segment or T-wave changes in inferior leads (II, III, aVF) and lateral leads (I, aVL, V5-V6) 5
   • Any acute ischemic changes 6

2. Check cardiac biomarkers (high-sensitivity troponin):

   • If elevated: Treat as acute coronary syndrome with antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation, and urgent cardiology consultation 6
   • If normal: Proceed with stress testing 5

3. Review cardiovascular risk factors and symptoms:

   • Presence of chest pain, dyspnea, or anginal equivalents 5
   • Risk factors: diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, family history 5

Definitive Diagnostic Evaluation

If troponin is negative and patient is stable:

• Perform stress myocardial perfusion imaging (nuclear SPECT or stress echocardiography) to assess for inducible ischemia in the inferior and inferolateral territories 5
• Even mild perfusion defects in the inferolateral wall should be carefully managed, especially in high-risk patients, as they correlate with significant LCX stenosis 5

If stress test is positive or patient has high-risk features:

• Proceed directly to coronary angiography to define coronary anatomy and determine need for revascularization 6, 5
• High-risk features include: diabetes, multiple risk factors, extensive wall motion abnormalities, or symptoms 5

Medical Management Pending Further Evaluation

• Initiate or optimize antiplatelet therapy (aspirin) 6
• Start high-intensity statin therapy regardless of lipid levels (secondary prevention if CAD confirmed) 6
• Consider ACE inhibitor or ARB, particularly if hypertension or diabetes present 6
• Beta-blocker therapy if prior MI is confirmed 6

Critical Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do Not Be Falsely Reassured by Normal EF

• A normal or preserved EF does not exclude significant coronary disease when regional wall motion abnormalities are present 3, 4
• Regional dysfunction can exist with preserved global function because unaffected myocardial segments compensate for hypokinetic areas 4
• Studies show that regional LV dysfunction associated with critical illness or ischemia carries increased mortality risk even when EF appears normal 3

Recognize the Specific Pattern

• Inferior and inferolateral hypokinesis has a distinct vascular distribution (RCA or LCX) and different prognostic implications than anterior wall abnormalities 4
• Inferior wall infarctions may show less severe global dysfunction than anterior infarctions despite similar ischemic burden, because wall motion abnormalities are often most severe in basal segments with relative preservation toward the apex 4
• This is the reverse pattern seen in anterior MI, where dysfunction worsens from base to apex 4

Do Not Delay Evaluation

• Even mild ischemia in the inferolateral wall warrants aggressive investigation, as 21.9% of patients with mild perfusion defects required revascularization within one year 5
• Regional wall motion abnormalities may represent acute, subacute, or chronic ischemia - timing affects management urgency 6

Consider Alternative Diagnoses Only After Excluding CAD

• While other conditions can cause regional wall motion abnormalities (prior myocarditis, infiltrative disease, stress cardiomyopathy), coronary disease must be excluded first in a 65-year-old male 3
• Takotsubo cardiomyopathy typically affects the apex, not the basal inferior segments, making it unlikely here 3

Prognosis and Follow-up

• If coronary disease is confirmed and revascularized, repeat echocardiography in 3-6 months to assess for improvement in regional function 6
• Regional wall motion abnormalities may be reversible if due to hibernating myocardium rather than scar 6
• Long-term medical therapy and risk factor modification are essential regardless of revascularization strategy 6, 5