What are the recommended infection‑control measures, screening protocols, and treatment options for poultry workers at risk for livestock‑associated methicillin‑resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (ST398)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 7, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Poultry Workers and Livestock-Associated MRSA (ST398): Infection Control, Screening, and Treatment

Occupational Risk Assessment

Poultry workers face substantial occupational exposure to livestock-associated MRSA ST398, with colonization rates of 77-86% documented among workers with direct animal contact, though the actual infection risk remains lower than colonization rates. 1, 2

The transmission pattern is predominantly unidirectional from animals to humans, with colonization typically lost when occupational exposure ceases. 3 Family members living on the same farms show much lower colonization rates (4-5%), and community spread beyond this group is infrequent. 2

Screening Protocols for Poultry Workers

Pre-Hospital Admission Screening

  • Screen all poultry workers with nasal swabs for MRSA colonization prior to elective medical interventions and hospital admissions to prevent nosocomial infections. 1, 2

  • Hospitals should implement automated flagging systems to identify livestock workers upon admission as high-risk patients for MRSA carriage. 4, 5

  • Active MRSA surveillance cultures should be performed rapidly using validated microbiological methods, particularly before high-risk surgeries such as cardiothoracic and orthopedic procedures. 4, 5

Routine Occupational Screening

  • No specific guidance currently exists for routine screening of asymptomatic poultry workers outside the healthcare setting. 1

  • Screening is most justified when workers require hospitalization or surgical procedures, rather than as routine occupational health surveillance. 1, 2

Infection Control Measures

Standard Precautions for All Poultry Workers

  • Implement rigorous hand hygiene using alcohol-based solutions after animal contact and before eating or touching the face. 4, 6

  • Avoid sharing personal items (razors, towels, clothing) that contact skin between work and home environments. 6

  • Keep any draining wounds covered with clean, dry bandages at all times. 7, 6

  • Clean high-touch surfaces regularly, focusing on doorknobs, counters, and bathroom fixtures using standard commercial cleaners. 6

Hospital-Based Infection Control

  • Place colonized poultry workers requiring hospitalization in single rooms or cohort with other MRSA-positive patients, with healthcare workers wearing gowns and gloves for all patient contact. 4, 7

  • Contact precautions should be maintained throughout hospitalization unless three consecutive negative cultures from multiple body sites (taken at least one week apart) are documented. 7

  • Enhanced environmental cleaning with performance monitoring is essential in hospital settings. 7

Decolonization Strategies

Pre-Surgical Decolonization (Strongest Evidence)

  • For poultry workers undergoing elective surgery (especially cardiothoracic or orthopedic), implement decolonization starting at least 48 hours before surgery: 5, 6
    • Intranasal mupirocin 2% ointment to both anterior nares twice daily for 5-10 days 5, 6
    • Chlorhexidine gluconate 4% body wash daily for 5-14 days 5, 6
    • This protocol reduces postoperative S. aureus infections by 45% (RR 0.55) 6

Decolonization for Recurrent Infections

  • Consider decolonization only for poultry workers with recurrent MRSA skin and soft tissue infections despite optimized wound care and hygiene measures. 6, 1

  • Use the same mupirocin/chlorhexidine protocol as pre-surgical decolonization. 6

Critical Limitation for Active Workers

  • Long-term decolonization success rates are low (40-60% recolonization within 3 months) in workers with continuous livestock contact. 6, 1

  • Decolonization provides only temporary clearance while occupational exposure continues. 1

  • Do not perform routine decolonization for asymptomatic colonization in active poultry workers, as recolonization is inevitable with ongoing exposure. 1

Treatment of Active Infections

Outpatient Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

  • For purulent skin infections, perform incision and drainage plus oral antibiotics: 5

    • First-line options: clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, or doxycycline 5
    • Alternative: linezolid for more severe cases 5
  • LA-MRSA ST398 strains are typically susceptible (>95%) to mupirocin and retain susceptibility to multiple antibiotic classes despite multi-drug resistance patterns. 1, 2

Hospitalized Patients with Complicated Infections

  • For complicated skin and soft tissue infections requiring hospitalization, use intravenous therapy: 5

    • Vancomycin (first-line) 5
    • Alternatives: linezolid, daptomycin, or telavancin 5
  • For uncomplicated MRSA bacteremia, treat with vancomycin or daptomycin for at least 2 weeks with follow-up cultures to document clearance. 5

Clinical Characteristics of LA-MRSA Infections

  • LA-MRSA CC398 causes the same spectrum of infections as other S. aureus strains, including bacteremia, pneumonia, osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and surgical site infections. 2, 8

  • Patients infected with LA-MRSA CC398 generally show less severe complications, younger age, and shorter hospital stays compared to other MRSA lineages. 8

  • LA-MRSA CC398 typically lacks Panton-Valentine leukocidin and enterotoxin genes, potentially contributing to lower virulence. 3

Household Contact Management

  • Symptomatic household contacts should be evaluated and treated for possible MRSA infection. 6

  • Asymptomatic household contacts may be considered for decolonization only if ongoing transmission within the household is documented despite hygiene interventions. 6

  • Educate all household members on hand hygiene, avoiding shared personal items, and environmental cleaning of high-touch surfaces. 5, 6

Critical Pitfalls and Caveats

  • The occupational health risk from LA-MRSA ST398 is not well understood, with insufficient data on the true incidence of occupation-related infections. 1

  • While colonization rates are extremely high (77-86%), the proportion of colonized workers who develop clinical infections remains unclear. 1, 2

  • LA-MRSA accounts for approximately 10% of sporadic MRSA infections in Germany, with higher proportions (up to 15%) in geographic areas with high livestock density. 2

  • Intrahospital dissemination of LA-MRSA is rare compared to traditional hospital-associated MRSA, but nosocomial transmission can occur. 2

  • Monitor local mupirocin resistance patterns, as high-level resistance can develop with repeated decolonization attempts. 6

  • Do not use hexachlorophane in children under 2 months due to neurological complications risk. 6

  • Currently, no specific evidence supports measures to prevent community-acquired LA-MRSA infections in active poultry workers beyond standard hygiene practices. 1

References

Research

Livestock-Associated MRSA: The Impact on Humans.

Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2015

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of High-Risk MRSA Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Asymptomatic MRSA Nasal Colonization

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

MRSA Isolation Requirements

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.