In traumatic external bleeding, is hemostatic powder such as Celox (chitosan), HemCon (chitosan) or QuikClot (kaolin) superior to standard gauze for rapid hemostasis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 7, 2026 • View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Hemostatic Powder vs. Standard Gauze for Traumatic External Bleeding

Standard gauze with direct pressure should be the first-line approach for external bleeding control, with hemostatic dressings (including chitosan-based products like Celox and HemCon, or kaolin-based QuikClot) reserved as adjuncts when standard hemorrhage control fails or cannot be applied. 1

Primary Recommendation

Hemostatic dressings may be considered by first aid providers when standard bleeding control (direct pressure with or without gauze or cloth dressing) is not effective for severe or life-threatening bleeding. 1

The 2015 American Heart Association/American Red Cross guidelines specifically state this as a Class IIb recommendation with very-low-quality evidence, meaning it is a conditional recommendation based on limited data. 1

When to Use Hemostatic Dressings

Hemostatic dressings are likely of greatest use in the following specific scenarios: 1

  • Junctional areas where tourniquets cannot be applied (trunk, abdomen, axilla, groin) 1
  • When a tourniquet is not available or not effective to stop bleeding 1
  • After standard hemorrhage control has failed - in combat settings, hemostatic dressings were 100% successful in 66% of cases where gauze had already failed 2
  • Severe external bleeding in locations where standard hemorrhage control is not effective 1

Evidence for Effectiveness

Hemostasis Rates

  • Hemostatic dressings achieved hemostasis in 90.8% of participants (118/130) in human case series 1
  • In combat use, HemCon dressings resulted in cessation of bleeding or improvement in hemostasis in 97% of cases (62/64) 2
  • Animal studies showed hemostasis occurred in 74.2% with hemostatic dressings versus 50% without them 1

Mortality Benefit

  • Animal studies demonstrated mortality reduction with hemostatic dressings: 29.1% mortality with treatment versus 65.8% without (RR 0.44,95% CI 0.31-0.64) 1
  • A 2021 systematic review found hemostatic dressings resulted in shorter time to hemostasis compared to direct manual pressure using standard dressings 3

Time to Hemostasis

  • 73% of participants achieved hemostasis in under 3 minutes after hemostatic dressing application 1

Safety Profile

Complications

  • Complications from newer-generation hemostatic dressings occurred in only 3% of participants (3/96) in human case series 1
  • Both complications and adverse effects are now uncommon but may include wound infection and exothermic burns 1
  • No complications or adverse events were reported in 64 combat uses of HemCon dressings 2

Evolution of Safety

Early-generation powder or granular hemostatic agents were associated with exothermic reactions that could worsen tissue injury, which is why routine use was not previously advised. 1 Newer-generation hemostatic agent-impregnated dressings are safer and have largely eliminated these concerns. 1

Critical Training Requirement

Proper application of hemostatic dressings requires training (Class I recommendation). 1 This is a strong recommendation because improper application can lead to treatment failure, as demonstrated by two reported failures in combat settings that occurred with blind application into large cavitational injuries. 2

Practical Application Challenges

Combat medics reported that hemostatic dressings were: 2

  • Most useful on areas where tourniquets could not be applied to control bleeding
  • Most difficult to use in extremity injuries where they could not be placed easily onto or into wounds

Algorithmic Approach

  1. First-line: Apply direct pressure with standard gauze or cloth dressing 1

  2. If bleeding continues and is severe/life-threatening: 1

    • For extremity bleeding: Apply tourniquet if available and trained 1
    • For junctional/trunk bleeding OR tourniquet unavailable/ineffective: Apply hemostatic dressing 1

  3. Maintain pressure and activate emergency medical services 1

Important Caveats

  • The evidence quality is very low (downgraded for risk of bias, indirectness, and imprecision), making it difficult to draw robust conclusions 1, 3
  • Most human data comes from case series without comparison groups rather than randomized controlled trials 1
  • The 2021 systematic review of 107 studies with 22,798 patients found overall certainty of evidence was very low and often relied on indirect evidence and poorly controlled studies 3
  • Hemostatic dressings should complement, not replace, proper hemorrhage control technique 1

Cost-Benefit Consideration

The task force placed increased value on the benefits of hemostasis, which outweigh the risks (including infection and/or burns), though the cost of the intervention is moderate. 1 Standard gauze remains the most cost-effective first-line approach. 1

References

1
Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Related Questions

How should a patient with chest pain and hematemesis be managed?
How do I manage a bleeding, swollen elbow abrasion?
What are the best tools and methods to control facial wound bleeding in an adult patient with no significant medical history, such as bleeding disorders or anticoagulant use?
What is the treatment for a 2-year-old with bleeding from the ear?
What is the best course of action for a 77-year-old female with a superficial avulsion laceration and persistent bleeding on her left ring finger?
What is the appropriate evaluation and management for a previously healthy adult with new hypocalcemia, hypophosphatemia, weight loss, and chronic diarrhea?
What is the approved minimum age for benzonatate use and the recommended dosing regimen for patients aged 10 years and older?
What is the minimum age at which a 200 mg dose of benzonatate can be safely administered?
What is the first‑line imaging study for a suspected ectopic pregnancy in a reproductive‑age woman and what sonographic criteria indicate an ectopic pregnancy?
What is the appropriate cefdinir dose for an 8‑year‑old female weighing 98 lb (≈44.5 kg) with normal renal function?
Can pregnant women receive the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine between February and August?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Ask Question