What is the optimal wording to chart a normal pelvic examination?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 7, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Optimal Charting Language for a Normal Pelvic Examination

For a normal pelvic examination, document: "External genitalia: normal female anatomy without lesions. Speculum exam: cervix pink, smooth, nulliparous/parous os, no discharge or lesions. Bimanual exam: uterus anteverted/retroverted, normal size, mobile, nontender. Adnexa nontender, no masses palpated. No cervical motion tenderness." 1

Essential Components to Document

External Genitalia

  • Document the vulva, perineum, and anus as "normal female anatomy without lesions, masses, or abnormalities" 1, 2
  • This inspection is non-invasive and should be included in all pelvic examinations 3

Cervical Findings

  • Position: Document as anterior, mid-position, or posterior 1
  • Appearance: Normal cervix should be described as "pink, smooth, and uniform in color and texture" 1
  • Consistency: Document as "firm" in nonpregnant women 3
  • Os: Specify "nulliparous os" (small, circular) or "parous os" (slit-like) based on obstetric history 1
  • Discharge/lesions: State "no abnormal discharge, no lesions, no friability" 1

Uterine Assessment

  • Size: Document as "normal size" (approximately 7-8 cm length in nonpregnant state) or compare to gestational weeks if pregnant 4, 1
  • Position: Specify "anteverted," "retroverted," or "midposition" 4, 1
  • Contour: State "regular contour" 4
  • Consistency: Document as "firm" for nonpregnant uterus 3
  • Mobility: Note "mobile" and "nontender" 3

Adnexal Examination

  • Document as "adnexa nontender bilaterally, no masses palpated" 1, 3
  • Critical caveat: Normal ovaries are usually barely palpable or not palpable at all in most women—this is normal 3
  • Avoid stating "normal ovaries palpated" unless you genuinely felt distinct ovarian tissue, as this creates false documentation 3

Cervical Motion Tenderness

  • Explicitly document "no cervical motion tenderness" to rule out pelvic inflammatory disease 3, 2

Cul-de-sac Assessment

  • If performing transvaginal ultrasound concurrently, document "cul-de-sac: no free fluid" 4, 1

Common Documentation Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never document "normal ovaries palpated" unless you genuinely palpated distinct ovarian structures—normal ovaries are typically not palpable, and claiming to feel them when you didn't creates medicolegal risk 3
  • Avoid vague terms like "unremarkable" or "within normal limits" without specifying what structures were examined 1
  • Don't omit cervical motion tenderness assessment in symptomatic patients, as this is critical for diagnosing pelvic inflammatory disease 3, 2
  • Avoid misinterpreting cervical ectropion (visible squamocolumnar junction) as pathology—this is a normal developmental finding, especially in adolescents and young women 1

Context-Specific Considerations

When Examination is Indicated

  • Document pelvic examination findings only when clinically indicated by symptoms (vaginal discharge, abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain, dyspareunia) 4, 2
  • Routine screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic women are not recommended and should not be performed 4, 5

Patient Comfort Documentation

  • Consider documenting patient tolerance: "Patient tolerated examination well without significant discomfort" 1
  • This is particularly important given that 30-35% of women experience anxiety, pain, or discomfort during pelvic examinations 4, 5

References

Guideline

Approach to Pelvic Assessment in Women with Gynecologic Complaints

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

No. 385-Indications for Pelvic Examination.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC, 2019

Guideline

Palpability of Ovaries on Bimanual Examination

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Pelvic Examination Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.