What are the diagnostic criteria for Behçet's disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 8, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Behçet Disease Diagnostic Criteria

The International Criteria for Behçet's Disease (ICBD) from 2014 is the recommended diagnostic tool, demonstrating superior sensitivity (94.8%) compared to the older International Study Group (ISG) criteria while maintaining acceptable specificity (90.5%). 1

ICBD Scoring System (≥4 points = Behçet's Disease)

The ICBD uses a point-based system where patients scoring ≥4 points are classified as having Behçet's disease: 1

2 Points Each:

  • Oral aphthosis (recurrent oral ulcers) 1
  • Genital aphthosis (recurrent genital ulcers) 1
  • Ocular lesions (anterior uveitis, posterior uveitis, or retinal vasculitis) 1

1 Point Each:

  • Skin lesions (erythema nodosum, pseudofolliculitis, papulopustular lesions, or acneiform nodules) 1
  • Vascular manifestations (arterial thrombosis, large vein thrombosis, phlebitis, or aneurysms) 1
  • Central nervous system involvement (parenchymal disease or dural sinus thrombosis) 1
  • Positive pathergy test (when performed—exaggerated skin response to needle prick) 1

Clinical Context and Key Features

Oral ulcers are present in virtually all patients and typically represent the first manifestation of disease. 2 These recurrent aphthous ulcers are a near-universal finding and serve as the cornerstone of diagnosis. 2

Genital ulcers occur in the majority of patients and carry significant morbidity, potentially causing obliterative scarring if inadequately treated. 2

The pathergy test, while included in the criteria, is geographically variable—it is more commonly positive in Middle Eastern and Asian populations along the ancient Silk Road. 1 In countries where ≥90% of patients undergo pathergy testing, adding this 1-point criterion increases sensitivity from 95.5% to 98.5% while maintaining specificity at 91.6%. 1

Performance Comparison: ICBD vs. ISG Criteria

The ICBD criteria substantially outperform the older ISG criteria: 1

  • ICBD sensitivity: 94.8% vs. ISG sensitivity: 85.0% 1
  • ICBD specificity: 90.5% vs. ISG specificity: 96.0% 1

The ICBD was developed from multinational data involving 2,556 clinically diagnosed Behçet's patients and 1,163 controls across 27 countries, making it the most extensively validated diagnostic tool. 1

Common Diagnostic Pitfalls

No pathognomonic laboratory test exists for Behçet's disease—diagnosis relies entirely on clinical manifestations using these criteria. 3, 4 This absence of a definitive biomarker makes adherence to validated criteria essential.

The ISG criteria, while highly specific (96%), miss approximately 15% of true Behçet's cases due to poor sensitivity, which can delay diagnosis and treatment of sight-threatening or life-threatening manifestations. 1

Differential diagnosis must exclude Sweet's disease, pemphigus, erythema nodosum, and Crohn's disease, as these conditions can mimic Behçet's clinical features. 4

Special Populations

For pediatric Behçet's disease, the Pediatric Behçet's Disease (PEDBD) criteria published in 2015 should be used, as disease characteristics differ substantially between children and adults. 5 However, when PEDBD criteria are unavailable, the revised ICBD demonstrates the highest sensitivity in pediatric populations, while ISG criteria remain the most specific. 5

References

Guideline

Behçet Disease: Clinical Manifestations, Prognosis, and Management Recommendations

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

A Contemporary Review of Behcet's Syndrome.

Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2021

Research

Behcet's disease.

Clinical and experimental medicine, 2004

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.