Diagnostic Criteria for Tumor Lysis Syndrome
Tumor lysis syndrome is diagnosed when two or more metabolic abnormalities (hyperuricemia, hyperkalemia, hyperphosphatemia, or hypocalcemia) occur within 3 days before or 7 days after starting anticancer therapy, with clinical TLS requiring these laboratory findings plus at least one clinical complication such as renal insufficiency, cardiac arrhythmia, or seizures. 1, 2
Laboratory TLS (LTLS) Criteria
Laboratory TLS requires at least 2 of the following 4 metabolic derangements: 1, 2, 3
- Hyperuricemia: Uric acid >8 mg/dL in adults (>8 mg/dL in children) 2, 3
- Hyperkalemia: Potassium ≥6 mmol/L 2, 3
- Hyperphosphatemia: Phosphate >1.62 mmol/L (>4.5 mg/dL) 2, 3
- Hypocalcemia: Corrected calcium <7 mg/dL or ionized calcium <1.12 mmol/L 3
These abnormalities must occur within the critical time window of 3 days before or 7 days after initiation of cytotoxic therapy. 1, 2
Clinical TLS (CTLS) Criteria
Clinical TLS is diagnosed when laboratory TLS is present PLUS one or more of the following clinical complications: 1, 2
Renal Insufficiency
- Serum creatinine ≥1.5 times upper normal limit OR creatinine clearance <60 mL/min 2
- The panel recommends estimating glomerular filtration rate rather than relying solely on serum creatinine, as creatinine is a poor biomarker for acute kidney damage and depends on age, hydration status, and muscle mass 4
Cardiac Arrhythmias
- Ranges from intervention not indicated (Grade I) to life-threatening arrhythmias associated with congestive heart failure, hypotension, syncope, or shock (Grade IV) 4, 2
- Continuous ECG monitoring is mandatory for all patients with hyperkalemia 3
Seizures
- Ranges from brief generalized seizures well-controlled by anticonvulsants (Grade II) to status epilepticus or intractable epilepsy (Grade IV) 4, 2
Clinical Grading System
Clinical TLS is graded from I to IV based on the highest grade of observed clinical complications: 4
- Grade I: Serum creatinine 1.5× UNL or creatinine clearance 30-45 mL/min; arrhythmia not requiring intervention; no seizures
- Grade II: Serum creatinine 1.5-3× UNL or creatinine clearance 10-30 mL/min; non-urgent arrhythmia intervention; brief controlled seizures
- Grade III: Serum creatinine 3-6× UNL or creatinine clearance 10-20 mL/min; symptomatic arrhythmia incompletely controlled; poorly controlled seizures
- Grade IV: Serum creatinine >6× UNL or creatinine clearance <10 mL/min; life-threatening arrhythmias; status epilepticus
Essential Diagnostic Workup
Before and during treatment, obtain the following laboratory parameters: 2, 3
- Baseline assessment: Uric acid, potassium, phosphate, calcium, creatinine, BUN, LDH 2
- Renal function: Creatinine clearance or estimated GFR using MDRD formula or Cockroft-Gault equation 4
- Monitoring frequency for high-risk patients: Every 12 hours for first 3 days, then every 24 hours 2
- Monitoring frequency for established TLS: Every 6 hours for first 24 hours 2
Clinical Manifestations to Recognize
Symptoms typically appear within 12-72 hours after cytoreductive therapy initiation: 3
- Gastrointestinal: Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia 1, 3
- Cardiovascular: Edema, fluid overload, congestive heart failure, cardiac dysrhythmias, syncope 1, 3
- Neurological: Lethargy, muscle cramps, tetany, seizures 1, 3
- Renal: Hematuria, oliguria, acute renal failure 3
- Life-threatening: Sudden death from hyperkalemia-induced arrhythmias 3
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely on serum creatinine alone for diagnosing renal dysfunction in TLS, as it lags behind actual kidney injury and is influenced by multiple factors. Always calculate estimated GFR. 4
- Do not miss spontaneous TLS that can occur before chemotherapy initiation, particularly in highly proliferative malignancies like Burkitt's lymphoma. 3, 5
- Recognize that mortality reaches 83% in patients who develop clinical TLS versus 24% in those without clinical complications, emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis. 2
- In solid tumors, TLS mortality approaches 35% due to delayed recognition and less aggressive prophylactic measures compared to hematologic malignancies. 4, 3