What heart sound is most characteristic of grade II (pseudonormal) left‑ventricular diastolic dysfunction?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 9, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Heart Sounds in Grade 2 Diastolic Dysfunction

Grade 2 (pseudonormal) diastolic dysfunction is not reliably associated with any specific heart sound on auscultation, and the fourth heart sound (S4) is neither sensitive nor specific for identifying this condition. 1

Key Auscultatory Findings

S4 (Fourth Heart Sound)

  • S4 may be present but is unreliable: The fourth heart sound can occur in 35% of patients with normal diastolic function, 42% with mild (grade 1) dysfunction, and 70% with moderate dysfunction, but is paradoxically absent in severe dysfunction 1
  • The S4 has only 43% sensitivity and 65% specificity for detecting any diastolic dysfunction, making it an inaccurate clinical indicator 1
  • S4 is eliminated with firm pressure on the stethoscope, distinguishing it from split S1 or ejection sounds which persist with pressure 2
  • S4 is most frequently found in coronary heart disease and hypertension, but does not denote heart failure 2

S3 (Third Heart Sound)

  • S3 indicates more advanced dysfunction: When present, S3 suggests elevated left atrial pressures and is more characteristic of grade 3 (restrictive) diastolic dysfunction rather than grade 2 3
  • S3 occurs during rapid early diastolic filling deceleration and is associated with ventricular dysfunction 4
  • S3 denotes cardiac decompensation, unlike S4 2

Grade 2 Diastolic Dysfunction Characteristics

Hemodynamic Profile

  • Pseudonormalization pattern: Grade 2 dysfunction shows a normal-appearing Doppler transmitral flow pattern due to elevated left atrial pressures that oppose impaired relaxation 3
  • This creates a diagnostic challenge because marked diastolic dysfunction can be easily missed on routine examination 3
  • Elevated LAP is confirmed when more than half of the following parameters meet cutoff values: average E/e′ >14, LA volume index >34 mL/m², TR jet velocity >2.8 m/sec 5

Clinical Pitfalls

  • Auscultation is inadequate for diagnosis: Physical examination cannot reliably differentiate grade 2 from normal diastolic function or distinguish it from other grades 3, 1
  • Both S3 and S4 may occur together in patients with cardiac decompensation from coronary disease, hypertensive heart disease, or dilated cardiomyopathy, creating a summation gallop that can be misinterpreted 2
  • Objective testing is required: Doppler echocardiography is essential for accurate diagnosis of grade 2 diastolic dysfunction 3

Diagnostic Approach

  • Listen at the xiphoid or epigastric area if gallops are not detected over the usual precordial areas, particularly in patients with emphysematous chests 2
  • Use the "inching" technique, moving the stethoscope from aortic area to apex while keeping S2 as a reference point to accurately time any extra sounds 2
  • Do not rely on heart sounds alone: Proceed directly to echocardiography with Doppler interrogation of mitral inflow, tissue Doppler, and pulmonary vein flow for definitive diagnosis 3, 1

References

Research

Correlation of an audible fourth heart sound with level of diastolic dysfunction.

The American journal of the medical sciences, 2009

Research

Cardiac pearls.

Disease-a-month : DM, 1994

Research

Role of diastole in left ventricular function, II: diagnosis and treatment.

American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, 2004

Research

Mechanism of physiologic and pathologic S3 gallop sounds.

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography, 1992

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.