Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia
For adults with functional dyspepsia without alarm features, initiate a test-and-treat strategy for H. pylori followed by a 4-8 week trial of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy if symptoms persist. 1
Initial Management Algorithm
Step 1: H. pylori Testing and Eradication
- Test all patients under age 55 without alarm features using either 13C-urea breath test or stool antigen test (these are the optimal non-invasive methods). 1
- If H. pylori positive, provide eradication therapy first—this helps 1 in 15 patients with functional dyspepsia and may prevent future gastric adenocarcinoma. 1, 2
- After successful eradication, reassess symptoms before proceeding to acid suppression. 1
Step 2: Acid Suppression Therapy
- PPIs are the drug class of choice for functional dyspepsia, superior to H2-receptor antagonists, antacids, and placebo. 1
- Prescribe a standard-dose PPI once daily for 4-8 weeks initially. 1
- PPIs work for both epigastric pain syndrome (ulcer-like dyspepsia) and can benefit postprandial distress syndrome. 3
- If H. pylori is negative from the start, proceed directly to empirical PPI trial. 1
Second-Line Options for PPI Non-Responders
For Dysmotility-Predominant Symptoms
If patients have persistent postprandial fullness, early satiety, bloating, or upper abdominal discomfort after PPI trial, add prokinetic therapy. 4, 3
- Itopride is recommended as first-line prokinetic with excellent safety profile (adverse events only 1.5-3.1%), no cardiac toxicity or QT prolongation reported. 4
- The American College of Gastroenterology rates itopride's safety evidence as high quality. 4
- Itopride can be used as add-on therapy to PPIs when acid suppression alone is insufficient. 4
- Alternative prokinetics include cinitapride (favorable safety profile, minimal QT effects) and mosapride, though overall prokinetic effects are modest. 4, 3
For Pain-Predominant or Refractory Symptoms
Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are the most evidence-based second-line therapy for functional dyspepsia. 5, 6
- Start amitriptyline 10 mg once daily at bedtime, titrate slowly to 30-50 mg once daily as tolerated. 5
- TCAs target visceral hypersensitivity and pain pathways—they have strong recommendation with moderate quality evidence from the British Society of Gastroenterology. 5, 6
- Imipramine is an alternative TCA with demonstrated efficacy. 6
- Levosulpiride (25 mg three times daily) can be combined with amitriptyline for patients with mixed pain and dysmotility symptoms, as it acts as a D2 antagonist with prokinetic activity. 5
- The combination has no significant drug-drug interactions but counsel patients about additive drowsiness and potential hyperprolactinemia. 5
When to Perform Endoscopy
Age-Based Thresholds
- Patients over age 55 with new-onset dyspepsia require endoscopy before empirical therapy due to increased gastric malignancy risk. 1
- Patients under 55 without alarm features can be managed with test-and-treat strategy without endoscopy. 1
Alarm Features Requiring Immediate Endoscopy (Any Age)
- Unintended weight loss 1, 2
- Progressive dysphagia 1, 2
- Recurrent vomiting 1
- Evidence of gastrointestinal bleeding 1, 2
- Family history of gastric cancer 1, 2
Failed Empirical Therapy
- Consider endoscopy in young patients who fail both H. pylori eradication (if positive) and PPI trial, though yield is very low and may not be cost-effective. 1
- Endoscopy may provide reassurance to some patients but evidence suggests this doesn't help those who are most anxious. 1
Important Clinical Caveats
Stop PPIs before the initial diagnostic endoscopy—PPIs can mask malignant ulcers or alter their endoscopic appearance, potentially causing misdiagnosis. 1
The quality of evidence for prokinetics is rated as low overall by major gastroenterology societies, with only modest effects demonstrated. 4 However, itopride specifically has moderate-quality evidence for dysmotility symptoms. 4
SSRIs and SNRIs have not shown benefit in functional dyspepsia and should not be used as neuromodulators for this indication. 6
Avoid repetitive or extensive testing in the absence of alarm features—this has low diagnostic yield and is not cost-effective compared to empirical management. 1, 7