Mechanical Embolectomy is the Most Appropriate Management
In this patient presenting 12 hours after symptom onset with resolved weakness but persistent proximal anterior circulation occlusion and small-to-moderate ischemic core, mechanical thrombectomy (embolectomy) is the definitive treatment—option B is correct.
Why Mechanical Thrombectomy Alone
Time Window Excludes IV tPA Monotherapy
- The patient is 12 hours from symptom onset, which exceeds the 4.5-hour FDA-approved window for intravenous tPA, making tPA alone (option A) inappropriate 1, 2.
- At 12 hours, mechanical thrombectomy remains the primary reperfusion strategy regardless of symptom resolution when favorable imaging criteria are met 1.
Persistent Large-Vessel Occlusion Despite Clinical Improvement
- A proximal anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion with a small-to-moderate ischemic core signifies substantial at-risk brain tissue even when clinical symptoms have transiently improved, supporting thrombectomy in this setting 1.
- The natural history of untreated proximal occlusions is associated with high morbidity and mortality; observation (option D) would expose the patient to unacceptable risk 1.
- Transient symptom resolution does not eliminate the need for revascularization when imaging demonstrates persistent occlusion with salvageable tissue 1.
Extended Time Window Eligibility
- Mechanical thrombectomy can be performed up to 24 hours after symptom onset in patients with proximal anterior circulation occlusions and favorable perfusion imaging 3, 2, 4.
- The patient meets criteria for extended-window thrombectomy: proximal anterior circulation occlusion, small-to-moderate core (implying ASPECTS ≥6 or core <70 mL), and presentation within 12 hours 3, 1, 4.
- Both DAWN and DEFUSE-3 trials demonstrated that patients treated up to 24 hours achieved significantly higher rates of functional independence (49% vs. 13% and 44.6% vs. 16.7%) compared to medical management alone 3.
Why Not Combined tPA + Thrombectomy (Option C)
- Beyond the 4.5-hour window, IV tPA is contraindicated, making the combination approach (option C) inappropriate 1, 2.
- For patients presenting beyond the standard tPA window with favorable imaging, mechanical thrombectomy alone is the recommended strategy 1, 2.
- Guidelines recommend not delaying catheter angiography to await the effect of intravenous thrombolysis, as this worsens clinical outcomes 4.
Urgency of Treatment
- Each 30-minute delay in achieving recanalization reduces the probability of good functional outcome by approximately 8-14%, underscoring the urgency of immediate endovascular treatment 1, 2.
- Door-to-groin puncture should occur within 60 minutes of imaging completion, and unnecessary delays worsen outcomes 1, 2.
Technical Execution
- The angiographic goal should be TICI 2b/3 reperfusion to maximize functional outcomes 3, 4.
- Use stent-retrievers in combination with aspiration techniques for optimal first-pass reperfusion 3, 1, 2.
Critical Pitfall to Avoid
- "Patient overselection" is a major error: unnecessarily restrictive criteria or delays based on symptom resolution worsen outcomes when imaging demonstrates persistent occlusion with salvageable tissue 1.
- Do not withhold thrombectomy based solely on clinical improvement; the imaging findings (persistent occlusion + small core) dictate treatment 1, 2.
Post-Procedure Management
- Maintain blood pressure ≤180/105 mmHg for 24 hours after thrombectomy to reduce hemorrhagic complications 1.