Laboratory Testing to Rule Out Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
When ANA testing is positive or clinical suspicion for SLE exists, order a comprehensive autoantibody panel including anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-Ro/SSA, anti-La/SSB, anti-RNP, antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, anti-β2-glycoprotein I), and complement levels (C3, C4) to establish or exclude the diagnosis. 1
Initial Screening Strategy
ANA Testing as First-Line
- ANA by indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells is the reference screening method, with >95% sensitivity for SLE, making it the most effective test to rule out the disease 2, 1
- Screen at a dilution of 1:80–1:160; titers ≥1:160 are clinically significant 1
- Report both the titer and immunofluorescence pattern; a homogeneous pattern associates with more severe disease activity 1
- A negative ANA by immunofluorescence makes SLE highly unlikely (negative predictive value >95%) and should prompt consideration of alternative diagnoses 1
Critical Caveat About Alternative ANA Methods
- Automated ANA platforms (ELISA, multiplex) must not be used as the sole screening test because they have lower sensitivity and may miss relevant antibodies 1
- If automated platforms are used, the specific method must be documented and should not be labeled simply as "ANA test" 2, 1
Comprehensive Autoantibody Panel (When ANA Positive)
Specific Autoantibodies
- Anti-dsDNA antibodies: Use a double-screening strategy with solid-phase assay followed by Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT) for higher specificity 2, 1
- Anti-Sm antibodies: Highly specific for SLE 3, 1
- Anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB antibodies: Important for neonatal lupus risk assessment before pregnancy 1
- Anti-RNP antibodies: Part of the comprehensive panel 1
- Antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin IgG/IgM, anti-β2-glycoprotein I IgG/IgM): Essential for thrombotic risk stratification 1
Complement Testing
- C3 and C4 levels should be assessed as part of initial diagnostic evaluation 1
- Low complement levels correlate with disease activity 3
- C1q levels are associated with SLE flare-ups 3
Essential Baseline Laboratory Tests
Hematologic Assessment
- Complete blood count with differential to screen for cytopenias; severe lymphopenia (<500 cells/mm³) or neutropenia (<500 cells/mm³) signals high infection risk 1
Renal Function Assessment
- Serum creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 1
- Urinalysis with microscopy 1
- Quantitative protein assessment (urine protein/creatinine ratio or 24-hour proteinuria) to detect renal involvement 1
Inflammatory Markers
Additional Baseline Tests
- Serum albumin to identify hypoalbuminemia related to disease activity or renal loss 1
- Liver function tests as part of the baseline metabolic panel 1
Infection Screening Before Immunosuppression
Complete these screens before initiating high-dose glucocorticoids or immunosuppressive therapy:
- HIV, hepatitis C, and hepatitis B screening based on individual risk factors 1
- Tuberculosis screening according to local guidelines (interferon-γ release assay or tuberculin skin test with chest radiography) 1
Diagnostic Algorithm Based on Test Results
If ANA Negative at 1:160 Dilution
- SLE is highly unlikely; consider alternative diagnoses 1
- If clinical suspicion remains very high with multisystem involvement, consider rare ANA-negative SLE and repeat testing in 3–6 months 2
If ANA Positive
- Proceed with comprehensive autoantibody panel (anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-Ro/SSA, anti-La/SSB, anti-RNP, antiphospholipid antibodies) 1
- Measure complement levels (C3, C4) 1
- For anti-dsDNA testing: Use solid-phase assay (SPA) followed by CLIFT confirmation 2
Interpretation Based on ANA Pattern
- Homogeneous pattern: Associated with more severe disease activity; 82% of anti-dsDNA-positive patients with this pattern have SLE 1, 4
- Speckled pattern: Also clinically significant for SLE diagnosis 4
- Combining two quantitative anti-dsDNA methods (e.g., RIA + CLIA) in patients with homogeneous or speckled ANA patterns maximizes specificity and positive predictive value 4
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely solely on ANA without further specific antibody testing, as this can lead to misdiagnosis 1
- Do not repeat ANA testing once positive; it is neither appropriate nor cost-effective for monitoring disease activity 3
- Do not order ANA in patients without unexplained involvement of two or more organ systems, as low disease prevalence in primary care yields low predictive value 5
- Be aware that RF can be positive in 30–40% of SLE patients, particularly those with antiphospholipid antibodies, and does not indicate rheumatoid arthritis in this context 3