In a cohort study comparing a bad diet to a good diet, what does the relative risk measure?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 10, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Understanding Relative Risk in Cohort Studies

In a cohort study comparing bad diet to good diet, relative risk measures the ratio of the probability (risk) of developing heart disease in the exposed group (bad diet) compared to the probability of developing heart disease in the unexposed group (good diet).

What Relative Risk Actually Measures

Relative risk (RR) is fundamentally a comparative measure that quantifies the probability of an outcome occurring in an exposed group relative to an unexposed group 1. In the context of your cohort study:

  • RR compares the risk of heart disease between the two diet groups 2
  • It is calculated as: RR = (Risk in exposed group) / (Risk in unexposed group) 1
  • The "exposed" group would be those with the bad diet, and the "unexposed" reference group would be those with the good diet

Why the Answer is Option B (with clarification)

The most accurate answer is Option B: "Risk of heart disease in exposed group" - though this requires important clarification. The relative risk doesn't measure the absolute risk in the exposed group alone, but rather the ratio of risk in the exposed group compared to the unexposed group 1.

Breaking Down Each Option:

  • Option A (Odds): This confuses relative risk with odds ratio. While odds ratios are used in case-control studies, relative risk directly measures probability ratios in cohort studies 3, 1

  • Option B (Risk in exposed group): This is the closest answer, as RR fundamentally relates to the risk in the exposed group, though technically it's a comparison of that risk to the unexposed group 1

  • Option C (Probability based on diet): This is too vague and doesn't capture the comparative nature of relative risk 1

Key Distinctions in Cohort Studies

In cohort studies specifically, relative risk can be directly calculated because you follow both exposed and unexposed groups forward in time 3, 1. This differs from case-control studies where:

  • You cannot directly calculate relative risk 3
  • Odds ratios are used instead 3
  • The odds ratio approximates the risk ratio only when the outcome is rare (<10% incidence) 3, 4

Clinical Context

When interpreting relative risk from dietary cohort studies examining cardiovascular outcomes:

  • RR > 1 indicates increased risk in the exposed (bad diet) group 1
  • RR < 1 indicates decreased risk (protective effect) in the exposed group 1
  • RR = 1 indicates no difference in risk between groups 1

The relative risk provides a measure of association strength between dietary exposure and cardiac disease outcomes in population-based research 2.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.