In the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial of post‑acute coronary syndrome patients (1–12 months after event) aged ≥40 years on high‑intensity statins with LDL‑cholesterol ≥70 mg/dL, what were the concise results on LDL‑cholesterol reduction, the alirocumab (Praluent) dosing regimen (75 mg titrated to 150 mg every two weeks), and the statistical significance of the cardiovascular outcome reduction?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

ODYSSEY OUTCOMES Trial Summary: Alirocumab for LDL-Cholesterol Management After Acute Coronary Syndrome

In post-ACS patients with LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL despite high-intensity statins, alirocumab 75 mg titrated to 150 mg every two weeks reduced major cardiovascular events by 15% and all-cause mortality by 15%, with the greatest absolute benefit in patients with baseline LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL. 1

Trial Design and Patient Population

  • ODYSSEY OUTCOMES enrolled 18,924 patients aged ≥40 years who had experienced an acute coronary syndrome 1–12 months prior (median 2.6 months) and maintained elevated LDL-C despite maximally tolerated statin therapy. 2, 1

  • Baseline lipid levels: Median LDL-C was 92 mg/dL across both treatment arms, with 88.8% of patients on high-intensity statins, 8.7% on low/moderate-intensity statins, and 2.4% on no statin due to documented intolerance. 2, 3

  • Inclusion criteria required LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL, non-HDL-C ≥100 mg/dL, or apolipoprotein B ≥80 mg/dL despite intensive statin treatment (atorvastatin 40–80 mg or rosuvastatin 20–40 mg daily, or maximum tolerated dose). 2, 4

Alirocumab Dosing Regimen and Titration Strategy

  • Starting dose: Alirocumab 75 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks, with protocol-driven titration to 150 mg every 2 weeks at week 12 if LDL-C remained ≥70 mg/dL at week 8. 1

  • Target LDL-C range: The trial aimed for achieved LDL-C between 25–50 mg/dL during treatment. 2, 1

  • Dose adjustments: 27.7% of patients required up-titration to 150 mg; conversely, 7.7% had alirocumab temporarily discontinued (switched to placebo) when two consecutive LDL-C measurements fell below 15 mg/dL on the 75 mg dose. 1

LDL-Cholesterol Reduction Achieved

  • Alirocumab produced a 48% reduction in LDL-C at 12 months (median LDL-C 48 mg/dL with alirocumab versus 96 mg/dL with placebo), with persistent effects through 48 months. 2, 1

  • Absolute LDL-C reduction: Mean reduction of 52.9 mg/dL in patients on high-intensity statins, 56.7 mg/dL in those on low/moderate-intensity statins, and 86.1 mg/dL in statin-intolerant patients. 3

  • 42% of alirocumab-treated patients achieved LDL-C <25 mg/dL without safety concerns. 2, 1

Primary Cardiovascular Outcomes and Statistical Significance

  • Primary composite endpoint (coronary heart disease death, nonfatal MI, ischemic stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization) occurred in 9.5% of alirocumab patients versus 11.1% of placebo patients over median 2.8 years follow-up. 2, 1

  • Hazard ratio 0.85 (95% CI 0.78–0.93; P <0.001), representing a 15% relative risk reduction, 1.6% absolute risk reduction, and number-needed-to-treat of 63 over 2.8 years. 2, 1

  • All-cause mortality was reduced by 15%: 3.5% with alirocumab versus 4.1% with placebo (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73–0.98; P=0.03), yielding an absolute risk reduction of 0.6% and NNT of 167. 2, 1, 5

Subgroup Analyses: Populations with Greatest Benefit

  • Patients with baseline LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL experienced the largest absolute benefit: In this highest tertile, alirocumab reduced death with HR 0.71 (95% CI 0.56–0.90; P for interaction=0.007), though relative benefit remained consistent across LDL-C strata. 2, 5

  • Diabetes subgroup: Among the 28.8% of patients with diabetes, alirocumab provided an absolute risk reduction of 2.3% (95% CI 0.4–4.2) for the primary endpoint, compared to 1.2% in prediabetes and normoglycemic patients. 2, 1

  • Polyvascular disease: Patients with coronary plus peripheral artery or cerebrovascular disease had placebo event rates of 22.2% (2-bed disease) and 39.7% (3-bed disease), with absolute risk reductions of 1.9% and 13.0%, respectively, though confidence intervals were wide for the 3-bed group. 6

  • Statin-intolerant patients (2.4% of cohort): Placebo MACE rate was 26.0% versus 10.8% in high-intensity statin users; alirocumab reduced events with HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.44–0.97), yielding an absolute risk reduction of 7.97%. 3

  • Patients eligible for ≥3 years follow-up: In a prespecified analysis of 8,242 patients, alirocumab reduced death with HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.65–0.94; P=0.01), demonstrating greater benefit with longer treatment duration. 5

Total Event Reduction Beyond First Events

  • Alirocumab prevented 385 total nonfatal cardiovascular events or deaths (including first and subsequent events) compared to 190 first events prevented, demonstrating that total event reduction was twice the first-event reduction. 7

  • Total nonfatal cardiovascular events were reduced by 13% (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.82–0.93) in the presence of a strong association between nonfatal events and subsequent death risk. 7

Safety Profile Over 2.8 Years

  • No increase in serious adverse events, muscle-related events, liver function test elevations, or neurocognitive disorders compared to placebo. 2, 1

  • Injection-site reactions occurred in 3.8% with alirocumab versus 2.1% with placebo (HR 1.82), but were generally mild and did not lead to discontinuation. 2, 1

  • Very low LDL-C levels (<25 mg/dL) were not associated with safety concerns: No excess cognitive impairment, hemorrhagic stroke, or impairment of steroid-hormone synthesis was observed. 1

Clinical Significance and Guideline Context

  • The 2025 ACC/AHA guideline recommends adding a PCSK9 inhibitor when LDL-C remains ≥70 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated statin plus ezetimibe in very high-risk patients (those with recent ACS within 1–12 months). 2

  • ODYSSEY OUTCOMES provides Class I, Level A evidence that alirocumab reduces both cardiovascular events and mortality when added to intensive statin therapy in the post-ACS population. 1

  • The trial's titration-to-target strategy (aiming for LDL-C 25–50 mg/dL) supports individualized dosing rather than fixed-dose administration, distinguishing it from the FOURIER trial of evolocumab. 2, 1

  • Mortality benefit emerged with achieved LDL-C levels: All-cause death declined linearly with achieved LDL-C at 4 months down to approximately 30 mg/dL (adjusted P=0.017 for linear trend), supporting aggressive LDL-C lowering. 5

Related Questions

How does the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial inform low‑density lipoprotein cholesterol management in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and what stepwise treatment regimen should be used?
In patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and low‑density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‑C) ≥70 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated high‑intensity statin therapy, what were the dosing regimen of alirocumab (Praluent), the study population characteristics, and the cardiovascular outcomes reported in the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial?
In a middle‑aged to older adult with acute coronary syndrome on high‑intensity statin therapy who has LDL‑C 70–100 mg/dL, should alirocumab (a PCSK9 inhibitor) be added to achieve LDL‑C <55 mg/dL and reduce cardiovascular events?
Alicromab vs repath, which is more effective and safer?
What non-statin lipid-lowering therapies are recommended for a patient with a history of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease, who is either statin-intolerant or has not responded adequately to statin therapy, according to the new 2025 ACS guidelines?
What is the pathophysiology of Wernicke encephalopathy?
Why did the hemoglobin increase by only 0.2 g/dL after transfusing one unit of packed red blood cells when the patient received a 1‑liter normal saline bolus beforehand?
What is the recommended as‑needed (prn) dose of zolmitriptan for an adult with episodic migraine?
In a patient with a complete duplicated collecting system, which is the preferred first‑line imaging study: magnetic resonance urography (MRU) or contrast‑enhanced CT urography (CTU)?
What is the first‑line outpatient treatment and dosing for a previously healthy 7‑year‑old child with uncomplicated community‑acquired pneumonia?
What high-fiber fruit is most effective for treating constipation in children?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.