Malignancy Risk in Dual PLA2R/THSD7A-Positive Membranous Nephropathy
This 62-year-old patient with dual positivity for anti-PLA2R and anti-THSD7A antibodies faces a markedly elevated malignancy risk that mandates intensive cancer screening beyond routine age-appropriate measures. 1
Understanding the Unique Risk Profile
Dual positivity for both PLA2R and THSD7A antibodies is exceedingly uncommon and fundamentally changes the risk assessment. 1 While PLA2R positivity alone typically indicates primary (idiopathic) membranous nephropathy with low malignancy risk, the presence of THSD7A antibodies signals a substantially higher cancer association. 1
Key Evidence on Dual Positivity
- Dual autoimmune responses with both antibodies present simultaneously have been documented in Chinese cohorts, representing approximately 2% of all membranous nephropathy cases and suggesting enhanced autoimmune activity. 2
- The presence of PLA2R antibodies does not exclude cancer-associated disease—case reports document very high anti-PLA2R titers in patients with synchronous esophageal adenocarcinoma and renal cell carcinoma. 3
- THSD7A-positive membranous nephropathy demonstrates a greater prevalence of concurrent malignancies compared with PLA2R-positive disease alone. 1
Mandatory Cancer Screening Protocol
Baseline Age-Appropriate Screening
All membranous nephropathy patients require standard cancer screening regardless of antibody status, including colonoscopy, mammography (if applicable), prostate-specific antigen testing, and chest imaging. 4, 1
Enhanced THSD7A-Specific Surveillance
Because THSD7A positivity is present, screening must extend beyond standard measures: 1
- Contrast-enhanced CT chest/abdomen/pelvis to detect occult solid tumors 1
- Urological assessment including cystoscopy and dedicated renal imaging (THSD7A associates with bladder and renal cancers) 1
- Gastrointestinal endoscopy beyond screening colonoscopy (THSD7A associates with colon and rectal cancers) 1, 5
- Lymph node evaluation as lymph node metastasis may be a specific risk factor for THSD7A-associated cancer-related membranous nephropathy 5
Serial Antibody Monitoring
Measure both anti-PLA2R and anti-THSD7A antibody titers at 3-6 month intervals to identify serologic shifts that may precede clinical changes or signal emerging malignancy. 4, 1 Changes in antibody levels can predict disease trajectory by 6 or more months. 6
Critical Clinical Context
The Relapsing Course Matters
This patient has relapsed twice despite rituximab responses. Each relapse with rising antibody titers increases concern for:
- Persistent autoimmune activity that may be paraneoplastic in origin 7
- Occult malignancy driving antibody production 3
- The need for repeat comprehensive cancer screening with each relapse 1
Age-Specific Considerations
At 62 years old, this patient falls into the higher-risk age group where membranous nephropathy patients with cancer demonstrate significantly older age and worse kidney function compared to those without malignancy. 8
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not assume PLA2R positivity excludes secondary causes—evaluation for malignancy must proceed regardless of PLA2R antibody status. 1, 6, 3
- Do not rely solely on routine age-appropriate screening when THSD7A is present—enhanced surveillance protocols are mandatory. 1
- Do not perform single antibody measurements—serial measurements showing trajectory are more informative than isolated values. 9, 1
- Do not ignore clinical context with dual positivity—this rare finding demands heightened vigilance for occult malignancy. 1, 2
Quantifying the Risk
While precise numerical risk stratification for dual-positive patients is not established in guidelines, the available evidence indicates:
- THSD7A-positive membranous nephropathy alone carries approximately 10-20% malignancy prevalence in reported series 5, 2
- Dual positivity represents an even rarer and potentially higher-risk subset 2
- The relapsing course despite rituximab may indicate paraneoplastic antibody production 3, 7
The practical recommendation is to treat this patient as high-risk for occult malignancy requiring comprehensive enhanced screening now and with each subsequent relapse. 1