PRP and Exosome Therapy for Androgenetic Alopecia
Primary Recommendation
Administer PRP as three intradermal scalp injections spaced exactly one month apart (months 0,1, and 2), combined with topical minoxidil 5% twice daily, which demonstrates a 1.74-fold increase in hair density and 14.3-fold increase in hair diameter at 6 months compared to baseline. 1
Standard PRP Protocol
Blood Collection and Preparation
- Draw autologous blood and process immediately using manual double-spin centrifugation targeting 1.0-1.5 million platelets per microliter 2
- Use nonactivated PRP exclusively—activation reduces efficacy by 31% compared to nonactivated preparations 1, 2
Injection Technique
- Deliver 5-7 mL PRP per session using 30-gauge × 4 mm needles 1, 2
- Insert needles at 90-degree angle perpendicular to scalp surface 3
- Inject at 2-4 mm depth to reach dermal papilla cells 3
- Space injection points 1 cm apart in systematic grid pattern across entire affected area 3
- Apply pharmaceutical-grade topical anesthetic before injection to minimize pain 2
Treatment Schedule
- Initial phase: Three sessions at months 0,1, and 2 1, 2
- Maintenance phase: Injections every 6 months indefinitely to sustain results 1, 2, 3
- Discontinuation results in progressive hair loss within 12-16 months 4
Mandatory Concurrent Therapy
PRP combined with topical minoxidil 5% is significantly more effective than either monotherapy and both are superior to placebo. 5, 2
- Apply minoxidil 5% at 1 mL twice daily throughout treatment and continue indefinitely 1, 2
- Consider adding finasteride as background therapy for triple combination (PRP + minoxidil + finasteride), which represents the most effective evidence-based approach 1, 3
Expected Outcomes and Timeline
Early Response (2-3 Months)
- Initial improvements in hair density become visible at 2-3 months 1, 2
- Hair thickness increases within 1 month after first injection 6
- Hair loss reduction evident after 3 months 6
- A 25% improvement in hair density at 2 months predicts sustained response at 6 months 1
Peak Response (6 Months)
- Hair density increases by 1.74 times baseline 1, 2
- Hair diameter increases by 14.3 times baseline 1, 2
- Mean increase of 45.9 hairs per cm² compared to baseline 4
- Telogen phase hair decreases by 9.3 times 2
- Terminal to vellus hair ratio increases in 60% of patients 7
Long-Term Maintenance
- Progressive improvement continues until 12 months 6
- Maintenance injections every 6 months required to prevent relapse 1, 2
Efficacy Considerations
Patient Selection
- PRP shows particular value in mild-to-moderate androgenetic alopecia, with more severe grades showing variable results 1, 2
- Women may demonstrate greater efficacy than men in hair growth/production 6
Critical Success Factors
- Higher platelet concentrations produce greater effects on hair density, follicle diameter, and terminal hair density 5
- Adequate volume of PRP (5-7 mL per session) is essential 5
- Treatment frequency must be maintained—inadequate frequency leads to failure 5
Application Method Comparison
- Microneedling delivery is superior to standard injection technique for anagen phase, telogen phase, and average hair length 5
Safety Profile
- Pain during injection is the primary complaint, with minimal morbidity and low cost 1
- No serious adverse events reported across multiple trials 4, 8, 7, 9
- Minoxidil is better tolerated than PRP due to injection-related pain 5
- PRP demonstrates satisfactory safety profile with no remarkable adverse effects 6, 7
Monitoring Treatment Response
Objective Measurements
- Use trichoscopy to evaluate hair density and diameter at 2,3, and 6 months 1
- Perform hair counts in specific scalp areas before and after treatment 5
- Measure hair shaft diameter using micrometer or specialized tools 5
- Conduct trichogram analysis using computer software to measure hair density, diameter, and terminal/vellus ratio 5
Clinical Assessment
- Take standardized before-and-after photographs for visual comparison 5, 1
- Perform pull test to assess hair fragility—fewer hairs indicate improved strength 5
- Use Global Physician Assessment (GPA) scoring 5
- Administer patient self-assessment questionnaires for satisfaction 5, 1
Exosome Therapy Integration
Currently, there is no high-quality guideline or research evidence supporting exosome therapy for androgenetic alopecia in the provided literature. The evidence base focuses exclusively on PRP, with emerging interest in platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) as an alternative.
Alternative to Consider: Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF)
- PRF is emerging as a potentially superior alternative to PRP, offering theoretical advantages with similar efficacy and lower cost 1, 2
- PRF demonstrates clinical efficacy in androgenetic alopecia with a similar safety profile to PRP 2
- PRF preparation is easier and less expensive than PRP 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Preparation Errors
- Never use activated PRP—nonactivated PRP produces 31% greater increases in hair count and total hair density 1, 2, 3
- Ensure adequate platelet concentration (1.0-1.5 million/μL)—low concentrations lead to treatment failure 5, 2
Protocol Deviations
- Do not skip maintenance injections—results are lost within 12-16 months without ongoing treatment 1, 2, 3, 4
- Do not use PRP monotherapy—combination with minoxidil 5% is significantly more effective 5, 1, 2
- Do not inject superficially—maintain 2-4 mm depth to target dermal papilla cells 3
Coverage Issues
- Inject across entire affected area in systematic grid pattern—incomplete coverage reduces efficacy 3
- Do not concentrate PRP in single area—distribute evenly across all treatment zones 3
Mechanistic Evidence
PRP increases proliferative activity of hair follicle cells as measured by β-catenin, CD34, Ki67, and Dkk-1 antibodies 5
Histologic improvements include:
- Increased number of basal keratinocytes 5
- Improved epidermal thickness 5, 4
- Increased number of hair follicles 4
- Increased Ki67+ keratinocytes in epidermis and follicular bulge cells 4
- Slight increase in small blood vessels around hair follicles 4
Evidence Quality and Limitations
The evidence for PRP remains somewhat controversial due to highly variable study protocols, preparations, and treatment intervals across studies 1. Meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials involving 238 patients demonstrates statistically significant increases in hair density at 3 and 6 months compared to placebo 9. However, improved and standardized study designs with larger samples, quantitative measurements, and longer follow-up periods are needed 1.