Dense Deposit Disease: Clinical Overview and Management
Diagnostic Characteristics
Dense deposit disease (DDD) is definitively diagnosed by the pathognomonic finding of highly osmiophilic, intramembranous, continuous electron-dense deposits along large segments of the glomerular basement membrane on electron microscopy, appearing less discrete and more confluent than typical immune-complex deposits. 1
Clinical Presentation
- Nephrotic syndrome is the most common presentation, with edema and nephrotic-range proteinuria 2, 3
- Nephritic syndrome with hematuria (microscopic or gross), hypertension, and acute kidney injury 4
- Acute kidney injury with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, sometimes with crescentic features 2
- Recurrent gross hematuria may occur with intercurrent infections, particularly streptococcal infections 4
- Partial lipodystrophy is an associated finding in some patients 2
Laboratory Findings
The hallmark laboratory abnormality is persistently low serum C3 levels with normal C4, indicating alternative complement pathway dysregulation. 2, 4
- C3 nephritic factor (C3NeF) is positive in many patients, representing an autoantibody that stabilizes the C3 convertase 2, 4, 5
- Anti-factor B autoantibodies may be present even when C3NeF is negative 5
- Complement factor H (CFH) polymorphisms or decreased CFH levels are frequently detected 2, 4
- Nephrotic-range proteinuria (>3.5 g/day or UPCR >3.5 g/g) 2
- Hypoalbuminemia in nephrotic presentations 2
- Normal or elevated C4 distinguishes DDD from immune-complex disease 6
Renal Biopsy Characteristics
Light microscopy typically shows:
- Membranoproliferative pattern with mesangial proliferation and capillary wall thickening 1
- Crescents may be present in aggressive cases 2
- Endocapillary proliferation in some cases 4
Immunofluorescence microscopy shows:
- Dominant or isolated C3 staining along glomerular capillary walls and mesangium (C3 glomerulopathy pattern) 1
- Minimal or absent immunoglobulin staining, distinguishing it from immune-complex disease 1
- Rare cases may show C4d staining (C4 DDD variant) 6
Electron microscopy (diagnostic gold standard):
- Highly osmiophilic, ribbon-like intramembranous deposits within the glomerular basement membrane 1
- Deposits appear as continuous, confluent, ill-defined segments rather than discrete deposits 1
- Mesangial deposits may also be present 1
Management Strategy
Supportive Care (First-Line for All Patients)
Initiate ACE inhibitor or ARB immediately and uptitrate to maximum tolerated dose, targeting systolic blood pressure <120 mmHg using standardized office measurements. 1, 7
- Blood pressure control: Target SBP <120 mmHg with ACE inhibitor or ARB as first-line therapy 1, 7
- Proteinuria reduction: Uptitrate RAS blockade to maximum FDA-approved dose 1, 7
- Dietary sodium restriction: Limit to <2.0 g/day (<90 mmol/day) to enhance antiproteinuric effect 1, 7
- Diuretics: Add potassium-wasting diuretics for volume management and to allow continued RAS blockade despite hyperkalemia 1, 7
- Potassium management: Use potassium-binding agents if needed to maintain normal potassium and continue RAS blockade 1, 7
- Lipid management: Consider statin therapy for persistent hyperlipidemia, especially with cardiovascular risk factors 1
Immunosuppressive Therapy
Traditional immunosuppression (corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate) has limited efficacy in DDD and should generally be avoided unless crescentic disease is present. 1, 2
- Corticosteroids: May be attempted in crescentic DDD with rapidly progressive renal deterioration, but efficacy is limited 2
- Cyclophosphamide: Consider only for crescentic DDD with >50% crescents and rapidly progressive kidney injury, using protocols similar to ANCA vasculitis 1, 8, 2
- Avoid routine immunosuppression: Standard immunosuppressive regimens used for other glomerulonephritides are generally ineffective 2, 3
Plasma Exchange
Plasma exchange may provide temporary benefit but does not achieve sustained remission as monotherapy. 2, 3
- Consider for acute severe presentations with rapidly declining kidney function 2, 3
- Typically requires multiple sessions but effects are transient 2, 3
- Should not be used as sole therapy; consider as bridge to complement-targeted therapy 2, 3
Eculizumab (Complement C5 Inhibitor)
Eculizumab represents the most promising targeted therapy for DDD, particularly in patients with preserved kidney function or post-transplant recurrence, by blocking terminal complement activation. 2, 3
Indications for eculizumab:
- Failure of corticosteroids and/or plasmapheresis to control proteinuria 2
- Persistent low C3 levels despite supportive care 2
- Crescentic DDD with preserved renal function (eGFR >30 mL/min/1.73m²) 2
- Post-transplant recurrence of DDD 3
- Positive C3NeF or anti-factor B autoantibodies with progressive disease 2, 5
Dosing and monitoring:
- Standard dosing: 900 mg weekly × 4 weeks, then 1200 mg at week 5, then 1200 mg every 2 weeks 2, 3
- Mandatory meningococcal vaccination at least 2 weeks before starting therapy 2, 3
- Monitor for complement inhibition, proteinuria reduction, and preservation of renal function 2, 3
- Duration: Typically requires long-term therapy (≥18-30 months based on reported cases) 3
Expected outcomes with eculizumab:
- Marked reduction or remission of proteinuria within 3-6 months 2, 3
- Stabilization or improvement in kidney function 2, 3
- Normalization or improvement in C3 levels 2
- Prevention of histological progression on repeat biopsy 3
Special Considerations
Post-transplant management:
- DDD recurs in approximately 50% of transplanted kidneys, often within 3 months 3
- Early recurrence warrants immediate eculizumab therapy 3
- Prophylactic eculizumab may be considered in high-risk patients (positive C3NeF, CFH mutations) 3
Infection triggers:
- Streptococcal infections may trigger disease onset or exacerbations in genetically predisposed individuals 4
- Treat intercurrent infections promptly and consider antibiotic prophylaxis during high-risk periods 4
Genetic testing:
- Screen for CFH polymorphisms and other complement regulatory gene mutations 2, 4
- Positive findings support use of complement-targeted therapy and inform transplant risk 2, 4
Prognosis and Monitoring
Approximately 50% of patients progress to end-stage kidney disease within 10 years despite treatment, with high recurrence rates post-transplant. 3, 4
- Monitor proteinuria and eGFR every 3 months 1
- Target proteinuria reduction of ≥50% by 6 months 7
- Check C3 levels every 3-6 months to assess disease activity 2, 4
- Consider repeat biopsy if clinical deterioration occurs despite therapy 3
Critical counseling points: