Prevalence of MDR and XDR Uropathogenic E. coli
The prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) uropathogenic E. coli ranges from 57% to 78% across different regions, with particularly high rates in the Middle East, while XDR strains remain less well-defined but carbapenem resistance is emerging as a critical concern.
Global and Regional MDR Prevalence
Middle Eastern Regions Show Highest Rates
Jordan demonstrates 57.3% MDR prevalence among uropathogenic E. coli isolates, with hospitalized patients showing significantly higher rates than outpatients 1
Iran reports 61-68% MDR prevalence, with inpatients at 68% and outpatients at 61%, representing resistance to at least three drug classes including aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, penicillins, cephalosporins, or carbapenems 2
Southern Iran shows even higher rates at 93.6% MDR among all E. coli isolates, with 96.3% of ESBL-producing strains being multidrug-resistant 3
Uganda reports 78% MDR prevalence among uropathogenic E. coli clinical isolates, with high association to biofilm formation 4
ESBL-Producing Strains Drive Resistance
ESBL-positive strains account for 34.6% of uropathogenic E. coli in southern Iran, with nearly all (96.3%) being MDR 3
Among ESBL-producers, 100% harbor blaCTX-M genes, 63% carry blaSHV, and 11.1% possess blaTEM genes 3
Jordan shows 78% positivity for CTX-M-15 genes and 76% for CTX-M-1 among MDR isolates, with 100% carrying the high-risk ST131 clone 1
Emerging XDR and Carbapenem Resistance
Carbapenemase Genes Signal XDR Emergence
Saudi Arabia reports presence of NDM-1, NDM-5, and OXA-181 carbapenemases in uropathogenic E. coli from community-acquired UTIs, representing extensively drug-resistant phenotypes 5
These carbapenem-resistant strains include globally predominant MDR clones ST131 and ST69, as well as ST410 and ST448 carrying multiple β-lactamase genes 5
Jordan shows minimal carbapenemase presence with all 50 tested MDR isolates negative for blaIMP, blaVIM, blaNDM-1, and blaOXA-48, except one isolate positive for blaKPC-2 1
Iran reports zero resistance to meropenem in both outpatient and inpatient populations, suggesting carbapenem resistance remains uncommon in that region 2
Resistance Patterns by Antibiotic Class
First-Line Antibiotics Show Alarming Failure Rates
Ampicillin, ceftazidime, nalidixic acid, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole exceed 50% resistance in Iranian isolates 2
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and amoxicillin show 93% resistance in Ugandan isolates, followed by gentamicin at 87% 4
All isolates in southern Iran were resistant to tested penicillins, with resistance to two-thirds of tested antibiotics exceeding 50% 3
Remaining Effective Agents
Nitrofurantoin maintains <20% resistance and remains the most appropriate empiric option for ESBL-producing uropathogenic E. coli 3
Amikacin (89.1% sensitivity), nitrofurantoin (85.9%), and gentamicin (82.4%) show markedly greater activity than other antimicrobials in Iran 2
Imipenem shows only 0.5% resistance in Ugandan isolates 4
Clinical Implications and Risk Factors
Hospital vs. Community Settings
Hospitalized patients demonstrate significantly higher MDR rates compared to outpatients across multiple studies 1, 2
Community-acquired UTIs in Saudi Arabia harbor carbapenem-resistant clones, indicating spread beyond healthcare settings 5