What is the prevalence of multidrug‑resistant (MDR) and extensively drug‑resistant (XDR) uropathogenic Escherichia coli, including regional variations?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Prevalence of MDR and XDR Uropathogenic E. coli

The prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) uropathogenic E. coli ranges from 57% to 78% across different regions, with particularly high rates in the Middle East, while XDR strains remain less well-defined but carbapenem resistance is emerging as a critical concern.

Global and Regional MDR Prevalence

Middle Eastern Regions Show Highest Rates

  • Jordan demonstrates 57.3% MDR prevalence among uropathogenic E. coli isolates, with hospitalized patients showing significantly higher rates than outpatients 1

  • Iran reports 61-68% MDR prevalence, with inpatients at 68% and outpatients at 61%, representing resistance to at least three drug classes including aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, penicillins, cephalosporins, or carbapenems 2

  • Southern Iran shows even higher rates at 93.6% MDR among all E. coli isolates, with 96.3% of ESBL-producing strains being multidrug-resistant 3

  • Uganda reports 78% MDR prevalence among uropathogenic E. coli clinical isolates, with high association to biofilm formation 4

ESBL-Producing Strains Drive Resistance

  • ESBL-positive strains account for 34.6% of uropathogenic E. coli in southern Iran, with nearly all (96.3%) being MDR 3

  • Among ESBL-producers, 100% harbor blaCTX-M genes, 63% carry blaSHV, and 11.1% possess blaTEM genes 3

  • Jordan shows 78% positivity for CTX-M-15 genes and 76% for CTX-M-1 among MDR isolates, with 100% carrying the high-risk ST131 clone 1

Emerging XDR and Carbapenem Resistance

Carbapenemase Genes Signal XDR Emergence

  • Saudi Arabia reports presence of NDM-1, NDM-5, and OXA-181 carbapenemases in uropathogenic E. coli from community-acquired UTIs, representing extensively drug-resistant phenotypes 5

  • These carbapenem-resistant strains include globally predominant MDR clones ST131 and ST69, as well as ST410 and ST448 carrying multiple β-lactamase genes 5

  • Jordan shows minimal carbapenemase presence with all 50 tested MDR isolates negative for blaIMP, blaVIM, blaNDM-1, and blaOXA-48, except one isolate positive for blaKPC-2 1

  • Iran reports zero resistance to meropenem in both outpatient and inpatient populations, suggesting carbapenem resistance remains uncommon in that region 2

Resistance Patterns by Antibiotic Class

First-Line Antibiotics Show Alarming Failure Rates

  • Ampicillin, ceftazidime, nalidixic acid, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole exceed 50% resistance in Iranian isolates 2

  • Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and amoxicillin show 93% resistance in Ugandan isolates, followed by gentamicin at 87% 4

  • All isolates in southern Iran were resistant to tested penicillins, with resistance to two-thirds of tested antibiotics exceeding 50% 3

Remaining Effective Agents

  • Nitrofurantoin maintains <20% resistance and remains the most appropriate empiric option for ESBL-producing uropathogenic E. coli 3

  • Amikacin (89.1% sensitivity), nitrofurantoin (85.9%), and gentamicin (82.4%) show markedly greater activity than other antimicrobials in Iran 2

  • Imipenem shows only 0.5% resistance in Ugandan isolates 4

Clinical Implications and Risk Factors

Hospital vs. Community Settings

  • Hospitalized patients demonstrate significantly higher MDR rates compared to outpatients across multiple studies 1, 2

  • Community-acquired UTIs in Saudi Arabia harbor carbapenem-resistant clones, indicating spread beyond healthcare settings 5

Virulence Gene Co-occurrence

  • 100% of MDR isolates in Jordan carry mutated parC and gyrA genes conferring fluoroquinolone resistance, along with ST131 clone positivity 1

  • Biofilm formation occurs in 62.5% of uropathogenic E. coli, with strong association to MDR phenotype (78% of biofilm formers are MDR) 4

Related Questions

What is the prevalence of multidrug‑resistant (MDR) and extensively drug‑resistant (XDR) uropathogenic Escherichia coli?
What is the prevalence of multidrug‑resistant (MDR) and extensively drug‑resistant (XDR) uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC)?
What is the recommended empirical antibiotic therapy for patients with suspected multidrug-resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) infections?
Is Macrobid (nitrofurantoin) effective for treating Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) urinary tract infections?
How should a urinary or systemic infection caused by an extensively drug‑resistant Gram‑negative organism lacking the classic uropathogenic virulence genes fimH, satF and cnf be managed?
What are the prevalence rates of multidrug‑resistant (MDR) and extensively drug‑resistant (XDR) uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) overall and among children carrying the O25b/ST131 clone?
In a stroke patient with forehead paralysis, what other neurological findings should I look for and how should I manage it?
What is the recommended treatment for acute anterior uveitis in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis?
Can an adult patient without peptic ulcer disease, renal or hepatic impairment, uncontrolled hypertension, or anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy safely take meloxicam together with duloxetine?
What is the appropriate management for an incidentally discovered, asymptomatic lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum in a middle‑aged to elderly adult?
How should I manage and titrate diuretics for a cirrhotic patient currently on furosemide (Lasix) 20 mg daily and spironolactone 50 mg daily?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.