What is the prevalence of multidrug‑resistant (MDR) and extensively drug‑resistant (XDR) uropathogenic Escherichia coli?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Prevalence of MDR and XDR in Uropathogenic E. coli

The prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) uropathogenic E. coli ranges from 61-68% globally, with extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains occurring in approximately 5% of pediatric cases, representing a critical public health threat that demands immediate attention in empiric treatment selection.

Geographic and Population-Specific Prevalence

MDR Prevalence Rates

The prevalence of MDR uropathogenic E. coli varies significantly by geographic region and patient population:

  • Iran: 68% in hospitalized patients and 61% in outpatients, with MDR defined as resistance to at least three drug classes including aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, penicillins, cephalosporins, or carbapenems 1

  • Mexico: 63% of all urinary E. coli isolates demonstrated MDR phenotype, with nearly all fluoroquinolone-resistant strains showing multidrug resistance 2

  • United States: 7.1% of urinary E. coli isolates were resistant to three or more agents in 2000, though this older data likely underestimates current prevalence 3

  • Nepal (pediatric population): 64.9% of E. coli isolates were MDR, representing an alarmingly high rate in children 4

  • Southern Iran: 93.6% of community-acquired UTI isolates were MDR, with 96.3% of ESBL-producers demonstrating multidrug resistance 5

XDR Prevalence

Extensively drug-resistant E. coli occurs in approximately 5% of pediatric urinary tract infections, as documented in the Nepali pediatric population 4. This represents the most concerning tier of antimicrobial resistance, where treatment options become severely limited.

Demographic Risk Factors for MDR

Certain patient populations demonstrate higher rates of multidrug resistance:

  • Male patients show higher rates of MDR (10.4%) compared to females (6.6%), and are more strongly associated with fluoroquinolone resistance and MDR phenotypes 2, 3

  • Elderly patients (>65 years) demonstrate 8.7% MDR rates compared to 6.8% in children and 6.1% in adults aged 18-65 3

  • Hospitalized patients have higher MDR rates (7.6%) than outpatients (6.9%), with hospital-acquired infections correlated with third-generation cephalosporin and nitrofurantoin resistance 2, 3

Common Resistance Patterns

Most Prevalent Resistance Phenotype

The dominant MDR phenotype (57.9% of all MDR isolates) includes resistance to ampicillin, cephalothin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, consistent across age groups, gender, and inpatient/outpatient status 3.

Specific Antibiotic Resistance Rates in MDR Strains

Among multidrug-resistant isolates, resistance patterns include:

  • Ampicillin: 97.8% resistance 3
  • Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole: 92.8% resistance, with >50% resistance in multiple studies 1, 3
  • Cephalothin/Ceftazidime: 86.6% resistance 1, 3
  • Fluoroquinolones: 38.8-47.3% resistance to ciprofloxacin 2, 3
  • Nitrofurantoin: Only 7.7% resistance in MDR strains, maintaining efficacy 3

ESBL Production

ESBL-producing E. coli represents a major contributor to MDR:

  • 38.9% of pediatric E. coli isolates in Nepal were ESBL-producers 4
  • 34.6% of community-acquired UTI isolates in southern Iran were ESBL-positive 5
  • 96.3% of ESBL-producers were MDR, with 100% harboring blaCTX-M genes 5

Critical Clinical Implications

Remaining Treatment Options

Nitrofurantoin demonstrates <20% resistance rates even among MDR and ESBL-producing strains, making it one of the few remaining reliable oral options for uncomplicated UTIs 5. Amikacin (89.1% sensitivity), nitrofurantoin (85.9% sensitivity), and gentamicin (82.4% sensitivity) show markedly greater activity than other antimicrobial agents 1.

Common Pitfalls

  • Avoid empiric use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin, or first-generation cephalosporins in regions with >20% resistance rates, as these exceed the threshold for empiric therapy 1, 2, 3

  • Fluoroquinolone resistance is strongly associated with MDR phenotype, so ciprofloxacin failure should prompt consideration of alternative agents and culture-directed therapy 2

  • Carbapenems remain effective with no meropenem resistance detected in some studies, but should be reserved for severe infections to preserve this class 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.