What is the prevalence of multidrug‑resistant (MDR) and extensively drug‑resistant (XDR) uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) in adult and pediatric populations?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Prevalence of MDR and XDR in Uropathogenic E. coli

The prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) uropathogenic E. coli ranges from 12-68% depending on geographic location and care setting, while extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains occur in 5-16% of cases, with pediatric populations showing particularly concerning rates.

Geographic and Population Variations

Adult Populations

  • In the United States, MDR prevalence among outpatient uncomplicated UTIs decreased from 13% to 12% between 2016-2021, with resistance patterns consistent across both in-person and virtual care settings 1
  • In Iran, MDR rates were substantially higher at 68% in hospitalized patients and 61% in outpatients, demonstrating significant geographic variation 2
  • The most common resistance pattern in U.S. adults involves penicillins and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), with 12% showing co-resistance to both classes 1

Pediatric Populations

Pediatric patients demonstrate notably higher rates of drug resistance compared to adults:

  • In Nepal, 64.9% of pediatric UPEC isolates were MDR and 5% were XDR, representing an alarming burden in this population 3
  • In Pakistan, pediatric patients showed extensive drug resistance in both E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains, with high resistance to β-lactams, quinolones, and fluoroquinolones 4
  • Among hospitalized children with complicated UTIs, 41.27% of O25b strains were MDR and 15.87% were XDR, with 64.28% producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) 5

Resistance Patterns and Clinical Implications

Most Commonly Affected Antibiotic Classes

The following antibiotics show the highest resistance rates across populations:

  • Penicillins (particularly ampicillin): >50% resistance in multiple studies 2, 1
  • Cephalosporins (ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone): High resistance especially in pediatric populations 4, 5
  • Fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin): >50% resistance 2, 4
  • Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole: >50% resistance 2

Antibiotics Retaining Activity

Despite widespread resistance, certain agents maintain effectiveness:

  • Aminoglycosides: Amikacin (89.1% sensitivity) and gentamicin (82.4% sensitivity) show preserved activity 2
  • Nitrofurantoin: 85.9% sensitivity in adult populations 2, and retained activity in pediatric populations 4
  • Carbapenems: Meropenem showed no resistance in Iranian cohorts 2
  • Polymyxins: Polymyxin B and colistin sulphate retained activity against resistant pediatric strains 4
  • Fosfomycin and chloramphenicol: Maintained antimicrobial activity in extensively resistant pediatric cases 4

Critical Clinical Pitfalls

The most important caveat is that empirical treatment decisions must be based on local resistance patterns rather than generalized data, as prevalence varies dramatically by geography—from 12% MDR in the U.S. to 68% in Iran 2, 1.

In pediatric populations, clinicians should maintain heightened suspicion for MDR and XDR organisms, particularly in hospitalized children with complicated UTIs where rates approach 41% and 16% respectively 5. The association of UPEC O25b with sequence type ST131 and phylogenetic group B2 represents a particularly virulent and resistant clone requiring aggressive management 5.

Avoid empirical use of ampicillin, first-generation cephalosporins, TMP-SMX, and fluoroquinolones in areas with high resistance rates (>20%), as these agents show >50% resistance in multiple geographic regions 2, 4.

Related Questions

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.