Which imaging modality is recommended after retrograde intrarenal surgery and before removal of the double‑J ureteral stent?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 12, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Imaging After RIRS Before DJ Stent Removal

Non-contrast CT scan is the recommended imaging modality after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) before removing the double-J stent, as it is the only reliable method to accurately assess residual stone burden and guide decisions about stent removal versus additional intervention.

Primary Imaging Recommendation

  • Non-contrast CT should be performed 2-3 months after RIRS to detect residual fragments before stent removal, as this is the gold standard for assessing stone-free status 1, 2.

  • CT is significantly superior to X-ray/ultrasound combinations for detecting clinically significant residual fragments (≥4 mm), identifying them in 43.1% of cases versus only 23.9% with plain imaging 1.

  • The timing of imaging should occur after stent placement but before removal to determine whether the stent can be safely removed or if additional intervention is needed 2, 3.

Why CT Over Other Modalities

  • Plain X-rays and ultrasound miss the majority of residual fragments, with CT detecting residual stones in 35.7% of patients compared to only 13.9% with conventional imaging 1.

  • Silent obstruction occurs in 2.9% of patients post-ureteroscopy and cannot be reliably excluded by symptoms alone, making functional imaging essential 3.

  • Relying on postoperative pain to determine imaging necessity places patients at risk for progressive renal failure from unrecognized obstruction, as 23.3% of obstructed patients remain asymptomatic 3.

Clinical Decision Algorithm

For stone burden <25 mm:

  • Perform non-contrast CT at 2 months post-RIRS 2
  • If stone-free or fragments <4 mm: proceed with stent removal 2
  • Stone-free rates approach 100% in this group 2

For stone burden ≥25 mm:

  • Mandatory CT imaging before stent removal 2
  • Stone-free rates drop to 80%, requiring closer surveillance 2
  • Higher likelihood of needing secondary intervention 1

For bilateral RIRS:

  • At minimum, maintain unilateral stent until imaging confirms no obstruction 2
  • CT or ultrasound required to prevent postrenal failure 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never remove stents based solely on symptom resolution - 7 of 241 patients (2.9%) developed silent obstruction despite being asymptomatic, with one ultimately requiring chronic hemodialysis 3.

  • Do not rely on intraoperative assessment alone - residual fragments are common and require objective post-procedure imaging to detect 1.

  • Avoid planning reintervention based on ultrasound/X-ray - these modalities significantly underestimate residual stone burden and lead to inadequate treatment planning 1.

Alternative Imaging Considerations

  • Ultrasound may be used in pregnant patients or those with contrast allergies, but recognize its limitations in detecting small fragments 3.

  • MRI can substitute for CT in patients with radiation concerns, though this is not standard practice for routine post-RIRS assessment 4.

  • Excretory urography or delayed-phase CT should be added if urinary extravasation or collecting system injury is suspected 4.

Stent Management Based on Imaging

  • If CT shows stone-free status or fragments <4 mm: proceed with stent removal 2.

  • If clinically significant residual fragments (≥4 mm) are present: plan secondary intervention before stent removal 1.

  • If obstruction is detected: maintain stent and address underlying cause before removal 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.