PLA2R Antibody Testing in Membranous Glomerulopathy
Diagnostic Approach
A positive anti-PLA2R antibody test in an adult with nephrotic-range proteinuria and biopsy-confirmed membranous nephropathy establishes the diagnosis of primary (idiopathic) disease and distinguishes it from secondary causes. 1, 2
Using PLA2R to Differentiate Primary from Secondary Disease
Positive anti-PLA2R antibodies (present in 70-80% of primary MN cases) indicate immunologically active primary membranous nephropathy, confirming this is a renal-limited autoimmune disorder rather than secondary disease. 1, 2
Patients who are anti-PLA2R seronegative fall into two categories: 1
- Those with recent spontaneous remission may still have primary MN if PLA2R antigen is detected within immune deposits on biopsy 1
- Those with neither circulating antibodies nor tissue PLA2R antigen likely have secondary MN and warrant investigation for lupus, hepatitis B/C, malignancy, or drug-induced disease (especially NSAIDs) 1
Critical pitfall: A positive PLA2R test does NOT exclude secondary causes. Some patients with anti-PLA2R antibodies may have coexisting lupus, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or malignancy. 1, 2 The relationship may be coincidental rather than causal, requiring clinical judgment to determine whether both conditions exist independently. 1
Evaluation for Secondary Causes Regardless of PLA2R Status
All patients with membranous nephropathy should be evaluated for associated conditions regardless of PLA2R antibody status. 1
Primary secondary causes in the United States to exclude: 1
- Systemic lupus erythematosus
- Hepatitis B virus infection
- Therapeutic agents, particularly NSAIDs
- Malignancy (age-appropriate cancer screening recommended) 1
For malignancy screening, limit workup to age-appropriate cancer screening (colonoscopy, mammography, PSA, chest imaging) unless specific risk factors or symptoms suggest additional testing. 1 The association between cancer and MN may be causative or coincidental, with higher frequency in older patients. 1
Prognostic Value and Treatment Guidance
Risk Stratification Using PLA2R Antibody Levels
Anti-PLA2R antibody titers at diagnosis provide critical prognostic information that guides treatment decisions. 1, 2, 3
High antibody titers at diagnosis predict: 1, 2, 3
- Lower rates of spontaneous remission
- Longer duration of proteinuria
- Higher likelihood of requiring immunosuppressive therapy
Low antibody levels at diagnosis correlate with: 4, 5
- Higher probability of spontaneous remission
- Better response to immunosuppressive therapy when needed
- Shorter time to achieve remission
In patients with non-nephrotic proteinuria at diagnosis, positive PLA2R antibodies increase risk of progression to nephrotic-range proteinuria (HR 3.66,95% CI 1.39-9.64). 6 These patients require closer monitoring and earlier consideration of immunosuppression. 6
First-Line Therapy Algorithm
Immunosuppressive therapy should be initiated only in patients meeting specific high-risk criteria, not based solely on PLA2R positivity. 1
Do NOT treat with immunosuppression if: 1, 3
- Proteinuria <3.5 g/day AND
- Serum albumin >30 g/L (by bromocresol purple or immunometric assay) AND
- eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m²
Consider immunosuppressive therapy when at least one of the following is present: 1
Persistent nephrotic syndrome: Urinary protein excretion persistently exceeds 4 g/day AND remains at ≥50% of baseline AND shows no progressive decline during 6 months of optimal antihypertensive and antiproteinuric therapy 1
Severe complications: Life-threatening or disabling symptoms related to nephrotic syndrome (AKI, infections, thromboembolic events) 1
Declining kidney function: Serum creatinine risen by ≥30% within 6-12 months from diagnosis, with eGFR still >25-30 mL/min/1.73 m², not explained by superimposed complications 1
Do NOT use immunosuppressive therapy if: 1
- Serum creatinine persistently ≥3.5 mg/dL (eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m²) AND
- Reduced kidney size on ultrasound (e.g., <8 cm in length)
First-Line Immunosuppressive Options
When treatment is indicated, choose between: 1
- Rituximab (preferred in many centers) 1
- Cyclophosphamide with alternating monthly glucocorticoids for 6 months 1
- Tacrolimus-based therapy for ≥6 months 1
The choice depends on individual risk assessment, with rituximab increasingly favored due to its safety profile. 1
Monitoring Treatment Response
Serial PLA2R Antibody Measurements
Longitudinal monitoring of anti-PLA2R antibody levels is essential for evaluating treatment response and should guide therapy adjustments. 1, 3
Changes in antibody titers precede changes in proteinuria by 6 or more months, providing an early indicator of treatment success or failure. 1, 3, 7
Immunologic remission (disappearance of antibodies) predicts subsequent clinical remission (reduction in proteinuria). 1, 7, 5 The probability of halving proteinuria increases 6.5-fold after antibody disappearance. 7
Measure antibody levels every 3 months during treatment: 1, 3
- Decreasing titers indicate successful immunosuppression
- Stable or rising titers suggest treatment failure and need for therapy modification
- Disappearance by 6 months indicates successful immunologic remission and should prompt limiting further immunosuppression 3
Rising antibody levels during follow-up predict relapse before proteinuria increases, allowing preemptive treatment adjustments. 4, 7
Defining Remission
Future definitions of remission should incorporate both clinical (proteinuria) and immunological (anti-PLA2R antibody) parameters, as this combination more accurately reflects disease activity than proteinuria alone. 1
Key Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid
Never assume PLA2R positivity excludes secondary causes—always evaluate for malignancy, lupus, hepatitis, and medications. 1, 2, 3
Do not rely on single antibody measurements for treatment decisions—serial measurements showing trajectory are far more informative. 2, 3
Do not delay kidney biopsy when eGFR is rapidly declining—this suggests alternative or additional pathology requiring histologic evaluation. 2, 3
Do not use THSD7A or NELL1 antibodies alone without biopsy—these lack the diagnostic accuracy of PLA2R testing. 2, 3
Do not interpret weakly positive results without confirmation—false positives exist and require validation with additional assays or biopsy. 2