Atherosclerosis Detection in Patients with Zero CAC Score
Among symptomatic patients with a zero coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, approximately 13-17% have atherosclerotic plaque detected on coronary CT angiography (CCTA), with 3.5% having ≥50% stenosis and 1.4% having ≥70% stenosis. 1
Prevalence Data from Major Studies
The most robust evidence comes from the large, multicenter CONFIRM registry, which provides the highest-quality data for symptomatic populations:
In 10,037 symptomatic patients without known CAD who had CAC = 0, CCTA revealed:
Additional research studies in symptomatic populations show variable rates:
Asymptomatic vs. Symptomatic Populations
The distinction between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients is critical for interpreting these numbers:
In asymptomatic individuals with CAC = 0, the prevalence is lower:
In symptomatic patients, the false-negative rate is substantially higher:
Plaque Composition and Characteristics
The atherosclerotic burden in patients with zero CAC is predominantly noncalcified:
- Among patients with CAC = 0 who have plaque, 97.9% of total plaque volume is noncalcified 7
- These noncalcified plaques are completely missed by calcium scoring alone 7
- The left anterior descending artery is the most frequently affected vessel (38.2% of plaques) 4
- Proximal segments harbor 50% of plaques, mid-segments 42.7%, and distal segments 7.3% 4
Risk Factors Associated with Plaque Despite Zero CAC
Specific clinical characteristics increase the likelihood of finding atherosclerosis despite CAC = 0:
- Age is independently associated with presence of noncalcified plaque 5
- Male gender significantly increases risk 5
- Diabetes mellitus is independently associated with plaque presence 5, 4
- Hypertension is a significant risk factor in both genders 5, 4
- Dyslipidemia independently predicts noncalcified plaque 5
- Non-obese individuals paradoxically had higher frequency of plaques (90.6% vs 73.9%, OR 3.4) 3
- Alcohol consumption was associated with higher plaque frequency (55.9% vs 34.8%, OR 3.4) 3
Age-Specific Considerations
Younger patients are disproportionately affected by the limitations of calcium scoring:
- Documentation of obstructive CAD without CAC occurs more often in younger patients in whom atherosclerotic plaque has not advanced to the stage of calcification 1
- In patients <40 years with obstructive CAD, 58% had CAC = 0, compared to only 9% among those aged 60-69 years 6
Clinical Implications and Pitfalls
Common pitfalls to avoid:
- Never assume CAC = 0 excludes coronary disease in symptomatic patients – the false-negative rate is too high (3.5-19% depending on the study) 1, 6
- Do not use CAC scoring as a surrogate for anatomical disease detection in symptomatic individuals – it was designed for risk stratification in asymptomatic populations 1
- Recognize that calcium scoring has poor specificity for diagnosing obstructive CAD due to the modest relationship between calcification and luminal obstruction 8
- In symptomatic patients with CAC = 0 and high clinical suspicion, proceed directly to CCTA or functional testing rather than relying on the calcium score to exclude disease 6
Prognostic Context
Despite the presence of plaque in some patients with CAC = 0, the overall prognosis remains excellent: